New year present for Alain!

Hello everybody,

I usually don't write on this forum, even if I read it regulary since years now.
After all this time, I wanted to give a "present" to Alain to reward him for all his work. Here it is: 978-2226158772

There is another something more I wanted to say. Since the begining of this forum, I could discover many things thanks Alain's work. But there is one thing that I couldn't find there: Biological transmutation.
As I was reading Jean Paul Biberian's website, I followed some links talking about Biological transmutation experimentations (Nuclear reaction inside a living being, pant or animal (or even inside human body )).
This kind of experimentation seems to be quite old (the first one was made in 1799 (!) by a french scientist, another one more recent (1970)). I would like to ear what you guys think about it.
Here is the link to J.P. Biberian's website for Biological transmutations: http://www.cryofusion.org/FR/biotrans.php

Happy new year!

You'r right!

I pointed you out this book because, even if one doesn't believe that water could store and send electromagnetic waves, the story about Benveniste and what he thinks he discovered is a very good example of how non-mainstream experiences are considered, despite results and reproductivity.
I thought you would be insterested to see how a few persons of influence can destroy a career (where Nature plays an important role!).
One could think that those cases, like cold fusion, are exceptions, but it is in fact "normal". Nowadays, many nobel prize laureates had to fight for their findings (e.g. quasicrystal (Chemistry Nobel 2011) or super-resolved fluorescence microscopy (Chemistry Nobel 2014)).

So you already knew about biological transmutations. I never read about it here, so I thought you wasn't aware.
Thank you for the fascinating link!!

Indeed, there is a lot of differences between LENR and memory water. I was only talking about the "fringe science" side of both subjects.

About the replication of water memory (I don't really like this term... :s), no artifact has been identified as far as I know. Many people suggested that the results could come from some artifact or errors, nut all those claims was not relevant or have been already checked and proven not to be the answer of the effects observed.
It went so far that, just by playing the waves (kH ranges) near an allergic heart caused the same reaction as giving it the medicament. No high dilution used at all!

Once again, I am just pointing out the reaction of the "head" of science toward "unauthorized" science, despite the results of many scientists worldwide.

About LENR, I don't think that a minor failure would damage LENR a lot. There is too much players having good results, reactors prototypes are already on the run. Big investors are not affraid anymore.
Even a big failure would not kill LENR anymore, it went too far now. We just have to be patient!