Is Erik Witalis fusion classified as LENR?

If one follow the classification of Edmund Storms it cannot be LENR.
key characteristic of LENR/ColdFusion for Edmund Storms is the uncommon absence of energetic gamma, tritium and neutrons commensurate with heat.
There are tritium, but a millions less than expected, mild gamma/X unlike expected MeV gamma, and trillion less neutrons than expected... for Edmund Storms this is the signature of LENR.

for mainstream science LENR, for DoE, which have nothing to do with voodooscience/ColdFusion, LENR is what you describe. They can even use the term cold fusion for some heavy nucleus fusion at mild energies.

for some LENR supporters the separation is less strict and some include beam fusion like fusor, or cavitation fusion, which produce the usual hot fusion ashes (much neutrons, tritium, gammas)

Storms disagree with WLS in that he estimate that ULM neutrons would be thermalized and be detected, even in minority. This is one of his arguments for his theory.

The experimental classification of LENR is as you say, absence of energetic or thermal neutrons commensurate with heat, of energetic gamma commensurate with heat, of tritium commensurate with heat, or energetic particles commensurate with heat...

there can be many bound or unthermalized (?) slow neutrons, much mild gammas, X-rays, eUV, tiny quantity of tritium, neutrons, energetic particles...

In fact for me this definition is interesting as it defines the "miracle" of cold fusion.

Cavitation fusion, fractofusion, DoE LENR and alike won't change much the books of physics.

LENR as Storms describe is a revolution, like superconduction was to ohm law.

It seems it is a natural well known phenomenon, when neutrons bounce on nucleus ... I cannot argue myself.
Like in a hardrock concert, even someone calm and static quickly get dancing with the crowd.