So the consensus at the moment is that no excess heat was observed?
Brian Ahern: Parkhomov replication
-
-
So the consensus at the moment is that no excess heat was observed?
I think so.
I guess Mr. Ahern is trying to keep silent as long as he hasn't anything interesting to say.
This way he can work without being interrupted by the large amount of questions and so on.What I know is, that he is still on it and is trying new ideas. But I don't know how they look like.
-
As I understand all results from Parkhomov to Songsheng are interesting, but no way definitive and perfect, and each have specific problems (TC reliability, signal over noise, incoherence, insufficient measurements).
There is good reason to pursue the research for replication , but nothing is still able to convince. We have to be patient and support the one who work. That is quite common in research. -
Sadly, he is not as open as he should be. There is much to learn from failures too. Else others will simply repeat those failures again and again.
-
I guess he's sure that Rossi and all connected to positive results like Parkhomov either cheated us, or got positive results due to measurement errors.
-
As I understand all results from Parkhomov to Songsheng are interesting, but no way definitive and perfect, and each have specific problems (TC reliability, signal over noise, incoherence, insufficient measurements).
I have not read anything of the sort,for example, the experience of parkhomov was known to be so simple (he preferred the water to modern measuring devices) that its XP could not be invalidated, in january ; everyone applauded its simple methodology...
What changed...?
-
I have not read anything of the sort,for example, the experience of parkhomov was known to be so simple (he preferred the water to modern measuring devices) that its XP could not be invalidated, in january ; everyone applauded its simple methodology...
What changed...?
(1) Parkhomov could not replicate (had he done so Nobel would be in the picture)
(2) Subsequent experiments had worse methodology (less clear, processed results in powerpoints, etc)All of this makes the original encouraging result look like an error.
Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.