22passi report a DTRA report of 2007

    • Official Post

    22passi report an old report of DTRA which have been published through FOIA
    http://22passi.blogspot.fr/201…eduction-agency-dtra.html



    There was a Panel on cold fusion, with many big names present
    http://www.governmentattic.org…RA-HESTA_2007.pdf#page=20
    What they said is not a surprise for us. They discussed of the opportunities, the challenge, and the reality of LENR.


    Note that 2 years later, Defense intelligence Agency produced this memo
    http://fas.org/irp/dia/lenr.pdf




    5.2 Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) Panel Dr. David Nagel, George Washington University, chaired the Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) Panel. He is a Research Professor in the School of Engineering and Applied Science of George Washington University. Dr. Nagel is a recognized authority on [lexicon]low energy nuclear reactions[/lexicon] in condensed matter. He commented on the present state of LENR research, noting some of the more important problems impacting LENR research today:
    ...


    so long for data to pass the dam of denial in mainstream media.

    “Only puny secrets need keeping. The biggest secrets are kept by public incredulity.” (Marshall McLuhan)
    twitter @alain_co

  • [With regard to what Alain and Longview were just discussing here on LENR Forum. This
    paragraph is directly from the Executive Summary of the DTRA 2007 Report declassified
    in 2011 and now linked here.]


    "The potential energy that can be tapped from the nucleus(> 106 eV/atom) is vastly
    greater than the energy available from the electronic states of an atom(< 1 eV/atom).
    The conversion of mass into energy, via fission and fusion reactions, is the basis for the
    only existing "high-energy" weapons, but further refinements in the design of these
    weapons, to make them more relevant to the post-Cold War security environment, are
    certainly possible. Another possible way to extract energy from the nucleus is to exploit
    the energy stored in metastable isomeric states. Also, despite the negative publicity about
    "Cold Fusion," the nuclear community continues to watch research in the area of low
    energy nuclear reactions with guarded optimism for possible future commercial and
    military applications. Anti-matter annihilation reactions involve the complete conversion
    of mass to energy with energy densities three orders of magnitude higher than nuclear
    fission and fusion. The prospect of compactly storing positrons in the form of chargeneutral
    positronium holds promise for viable military applications of anti-matter."


    Longview comments:


    I would think antimatter would be a lot easier to store as charged particles. Charge neutral
    makes it much harder contain, in my opinion. That is for neutral, magnetic and/or electrostatic confinement
    would require much higher strength fields.


    [But let's see if the "nuclear isomers' section has a long lived
    and triggerably convertible nuclear isomer that gains mass on anti particle decay... antigravity,
    time reversal, many million fold energy densities over hydrogen and oxygen.... can't wait!]


    Speaking of "orders of magnitude", The DTRA report shows that US government interests and awareness
    are higher by orders of magnitude over the vast majority of the corporately generated plebeian
    media circus in the USA.


    As an exception to that "circus" we would have to credit CBS "60 Minutes" for example.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.