About chromium if there is inox in the reactor it may be contaminants...
maybe isotopic analysis will say more
Parkhomov Paper 2015 03 26 English.pdf
-
-
About chromium if there is inox in the reactor it may be contaminants...
maybe isotopic analysis will say more
MFMP asked Parkhomov about missing Lithium in per fuel analysis. He said lab could not easily detect it. Amazing statement that. Especially when it was detected in post ash. Why use a lab that can't do a proper analysis and that issues analysis on plain page with no company headers/footers, run numbers, page numbering, number of samples taken, sample sizes, etc? -
About chromium if there is inox in the reactor it may be contaminants...
maybe isotopic analysis will say more
Concentration of Cr increased from 0.0358 to 1.4396
Concentration of Mn decreased from 3.6826 to 0.2936Where does the original Mn come from ?
Crazy idea, could the Mn give up a proton and transform into Cr? Mn 55 (stable) + 8MeV -> Cr 54 (stable) + proton.
Who will gain the proton ? Lithium 7 ?
The 8MeV could come from alpha after Be8 split which gives around 8MeV to each alpha. How? Spin coupling?
-
Stefanno Marchellini asked [lexicon]Alexander Parkhomov[/lexicon] about the copy paste artifact observed in the temperature graph, and he reports the answer on facebook :
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ECat.LENR/1135996836416219/
ParkhomovPDF.pdfQuoteDisplay More
Dear Stefano Marcellini,I admire your observation and I repent of the sin.
The matter is that the laptop on which there was a record of temperature, worked steadily only when was disconnected from the power supply network and was powered from the accumulator. Therefore sometimes it was necessary to interrupt record for recharge of the accumulator. It occurred at temperatures about 460, 1020, 1120, 1160 and 1200 oC. At this time temperature was recorded on the paper recorder and measured by pointer indicator. These devices showed the values of temperature close to the specified. That the plot looked beautiful and I didn't cause the questions distracting from the main point, such peculiar interpolations were made. It, of course a great sin and I sincerely repent. However it doesn't influence results of research in any way. I assure you that in results of measurement of power consumption and pressure of any shifts it wasn't made.
I send you the Excel file with the data obtained during experiment on which pauses in registration of temperature are designated by admissions of rows.
Once again I admire your sharp observation and high professionalism.
hope that this incident won't make the attitude towards me and my researches hostile.[lexicon]Alexander Parkhomov[/lexicon]
This is a credible explanation, as I suspected (filling the holes), but this is just an indication to be confirmed.
This put pressure on a better replication with better instruments.
As I have understood, ICCF19 was the occasion for many Russian scientists to propose some help.This replication is clearly not easy, as LiAlH4 + Ni + 1000°C + slow heating + pressure is not sufficient. Having the same material, seeing the place where it happened, could allow to replicate an unexpected factor.
I hope we get more news soon, on that "Moscow team".
-
David J French on Cold Fusion Now present his reflexion about Pakhomov experiments and propose replication ideas...
http://coldfusionnow.org/thoug…in-padua-by-david-french/
Quote
...I largely accepted and believed the video that was posted on the Internet and the associated information provided by Dr. Parkhomov both at the time that it was released and subsequently. In contrast, others persisted in casting doubts on this entire demonstration because of the temperature data that had been provided. However, for me seeing this humble 70-year-old retired physicist from Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia answering questions, answering the barrage of questions at ICCF-19 through the assistance of his very talented granddaughter validated in my mind that there was no fraud or mistake here. This was a genuine scientist who’d made a great step forward. For me this was the most important event that occurred at ICCF-19. I’m glad that Dr Parkhomov was honored by having, at his request, attendees assemble around his poster to pose questions to him.
...
QuoteDisplay More
Here’s my agenda: I think that the field needs to pursue new, focused and creative experiments that will lift the veil on this ColdFusion/LENR Mystery. Numerous experiments have been done in the past 26 years and there’s still no theory to explain the “magical” excess heat effect. Yes, there is a need for theoretical review, and the secret that everyone is seeking might be hidden in the 26 years of research reports that have issued. But, in my view, there needs to be a focus on new experiments that will lift the veil. The Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project is pursuing this objective.Recently I tried to describe to a Cold Fusion enthusiast and friend how I would take the Parkhomov arrangement and introduce variants that would help elucidate what is going on. Here’s what I propose:
...
