Video about Navy SPAWAR PdD co-deposition LENR/Cold fusion - A video to watch and share, by Ruby Carat

1st Official Post
    • Official Post

    Ruby Carat of Cold Fusion Now just finished to edit a very well made Video about the Work of US Navy Spawar, replicated by Melvin Miles.
    She interviewed those pioneer recently, Stan Szpak, Franck Gordon, Melvin Miles...


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The idea of those pioneer was to use codeposition process to build a fully deuterium loaded palladium electrodes by codeposition with deuterium from heavy water dissociation.
    There was key condition to respect but once respected it was well reproducible, and Melvin Miles experienced.
    Calorimetry could be made clearly providing doubtless results.
    They experienced thermal runaway, and to investigate they used thermal imaging which showed how hospots were apearing and disapearing continuously.


    This video is both accessible, and convincing for educated newcomers.
    This is an answer to those who thay that Cold Fuson is not reproducible, and meaurement always dubious.
    A video to watch and share, especially with dubious competent people.


    Thanks to Ruby for that hard work.

    “Only puny secrets need keeping. The biggest secrets are kept by public incredulity.” (Marshall McLuhan)
    twitter @alain_co

    Hi all


    Science 101 the data is what counts.


    It is when theory takes precedence over experimental data that science becomes pathological.


    When someone refuses to look at the experimental data, because "THE BOOK" of theory does not say it is possible or because the data has not been presented in a publication of the Church of high impact factor, a metric which incidentally has been thoroughly refuted; that is when a person stops being a scientist and becomes a priest.


    The Galileo test is will you put your eye to the telescope?


    In science we have theory because we know, there is no book! It is a theory because we recognise it can be refuted by data.


    Some questions to ask any one who raises the pseudo metric of impact factor as an excuse not to look at the data.


    Are you aware that impact factor:


    1) Does not work across academic boundaries?
    2) That it has been shown to be gamed by publications, so as to produce false results?
    3) That the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee told the Higher Education Funding Council and their Research Exercise panels, to stop using Impact Factor, as it is flawed?
    4) That it has lead to a reduction in real research, as reviews score more highly in this skewed metric?
    5) That the European Association of Science Editors put out an official statement saying it cannot be used in the way many pseudo sceptics use it?
    6) That the International Council for Science wants to penalise those scientists that over rely on this measure to game publications and this measure?
    7) That the National Science Foundation (US) and the Research Assessment Exercise (UK) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft have all downgraded this metric and has lead the American Society for Cell Biology to create The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) precisely to end the use of Impact Factor?


    I remind you also once again that one has to put ones eye to the telescope to call ones self a scientist.


    Kind Regards walker

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.