I know you just doing what you do Bruce but relevance of the field would be better to think about.

maybe this will help.

then go to a cavity structural effect

Viktor Grebennikov

External Content www.youtube.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

then..

Resonance- entropy

if it helps

https://www.entropy.energy/scholar/node/oscillator-resonance

Electron-assisted fusion was elaborated with Frank Znidarsic and it fits well my theory of low-dimensional cold fusion, during which the electron orbital screening applies. The main point there is, electrons form an energetic continuum at the bottom layers of electron orbitals (the spherical orbital theory of Randell Mills comes on mind here, but it's essentially Holmlid's Rydberg effect predicted with classical quantum mechanics as well). When atoms collide along single line, the electron orbitals move like balloon filled with water during splash and/or vortex ring bouncing along connection line and they periodically concentrate in the areas between atoms. When this moment coincides with maximal approaching of atom nuclei, the repulsive forces of protons get compensated with electron attraction in high degree, so that the atom nuclei can merge freely. Znidarsic calculated resonance frequency of this process and found it to be in TV radiowaves range (12-50 MHz). This model has also wide consequences for explanation of various EVO's, magnetic monopoles and X-ray jets during LENR reactions.

Взаимодействие с другими людьми

Quote from Wyttenbach

В круге ток всегда течет в двух направлениях. Так что все в порядке.

Остальное непросто, поскольку, как вы видели, мы не можем предсказать, в каком направлении развернется поток. Это каким-то образом определяется общей энергией / длиной траектории, которая соответствует CT и индуцированной зарядом орбитой 5-го вращения. Полная матрица вращения для потока 3D / 4D показывает, что мы можем иметь 2,3,5 точки связи волн. (3D / 4D означает 3 вращения трехмерной массы в четырехмерном пространстве)

Это еще больше усложняется тем фактом, что избыточный поток, протекающий за пределы трансформатора тока, меняет свою форму на соотношение тора 9: 8. Вот почему протон (частица 3D / 4D) имеет 1/9 избыточной массы, поэтому вы можете его сломать. Для ядер большего размера это становится еще более сложным, поскольку соотношение тора 7: 4 также активно.

Как сказано: Модель является отправной точкой и очень сложна, но подходит. На получение первых двух гамма-линий 12-С потребовалось более 3 лет. Пока только один человек работает над физикой SO (4), его прогресс и понимание будут медленно расти, и в моем случае они будут следовать за моей работой над LENR. Что иногда задерживает публикацию из-за других интересов.

"In a circle, the current always flows in two directions." Do you have proof of this physical process, Wittenbach ??? Please provide proof! I don't believe you for a second! You understand ???

Your understanding of English is very poor. On a torus current can flow in two directions in SO(4) 4 directions. This is the mirror view of static charge = no current but moving field.

Actio = reactio. Thus learn to talk about both sides.

A new USPTO patent on fusion assisted by electron screening --

United States Patent 11,049,621 June 29, 2021

Submicron fusion devices, methods and systems

Abstract

Methods, apparatus, devices, and systems for creating, controlling, conducting, and optimizing fusion activities of nuclei. In particular, the present inventions relate to, 5 among other things, fusion activities that are conducted individually or collectively on a very small scale, preferably on the nano-scale or smaller such as pico to femto scales, for the utilization of energy produced from these activities in smaller devices and for aggregation into larger devices.

https://patft.uspto.gov/netacg…,049,621&RS=PN/11,049,621

A related preprint by the same author --

Enhanced D-D Fusion Rates when the Coulomb Barrier Is Lowered by Electrons

https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12988

Quote from Lou Pagnucco

A related preprint by the same author --

"Confidential – Proprietary Information of Alpha Ring International Limited"

I guess it is no big secret

Quote from Lou Pagnucco

Enhanced D-D Fusion Rates when the Coulomb Barrier Is Lowered by Electrons

https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12988

Educated nonsense. The Schrödinger (Coulomb gauge) Potential anyway does not work for particles...

Sorry guys but I cannot see the point of working at the sub-micron level. The whole point of a fusion reactor is to achieve a critical mass of reactants within it. What these reactants are can simply be worked out from Leif Holmlid's revolutionary work.

Which is already worth a Nobel Prize. So I have put it all together for testing out. Containment material is -you guessed it - granite. Six inches square cube. Fe electrodes both sides. KOH internally. And the rest of it will be revealed if Alan Smith and Wyttenbach are on board. If not I will simply test the reactor here in Cornwall as a purely Cornish invention. Hence obtaining a purely British patent on it. And TG can just keep out of it. Got it???

Quote from Dr Richard

The whole point of a fusion reactor is to achieve a critical mass of reactants within it

You just mixed fission with fusion ....

TO:::Jerk of Electron-assisted fusion

I recommend that you may read my theory of Cold Fusion.

Electron behavior is very important and actually tightly bound d and electron pair cause the cold fusion.

Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply From Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

(PDF) Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply from Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

PDF | Abstract: - It is proposed that Cold fusion can occur in metal by D+ hopping to T sites with D– on the metal surface. In this mechanism, D+... | Find,…

doi.org

Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

(PDF) Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

PDF | Abstract:-Original nucleus model in the 1920s was internal electron theory that the atomic nucleus is constituted by protons and electrons, and... |…

doi.org

Dr Richard - I'm still finding bits of time to investigate these folks. Recently came across this (Google translate edition) I'm putting together a synopsis for off a thread. @ me if you find anything on the history and skillset of these players.

Exclusive] You can generate electricity when you put it on the table! The Chinese team Alpha Ring has developed an "artificial sun" and is building the next TSMC?

Text/ Lin Shihui

2020-08-18

https://www.gvm.com.tw/arti...

Alpha Ring International was founded in 2016 by Chinese physics scientist Huang Yaohui. Huang Yaohui is a member of the "American Physical Society" and an emeritus professor of "University of California, Los Angeles Physics and Astronomy". He was awarded the "U.S. "American Physical Society Award for Excellent in Plasma Physics". He personally owns more than 18 international patents, and has rich qualifications that few can surpass in plasma physics research.

Alpha Ring is headquartered in California, USA. However, this nuclear fusion technology FusioNow was developed in cooperation with Dr. Li Luoquan of Taiwan.

Li Luoquan was the chairman of the National Science Council and the president of the Central University. He has made many innovative contributions in space and plasma physics. He is also an academician of the Academia Sinica and an overseas academician of the National Academy of Engineering. Winner of the S. Chandrasekhar Prize of Plasma Physics, has published more than 300 academic papers. (2020.8.28 update)

In this study of nuclear fusion, he also brought domestic talents to innovate, which can be said to be the "light of Taiwan" in the energy industry.

At present, Alpha Ring is invested by the US-based China Economic Cooperation Group. China Economic Cooperation Chairman Liu Yuhuan is very proud of the results of this team and believes it is a major step forward in the global energy innovation competition.

"High cost-effective, clean and environmentally friendly nuclear fusion energy is achievable!" He said that he has always hoped to help Taiwan find the next innovative industry. He also hopes that such ultra-new technology can be established and grown locally. Taiwan is looking for more talents and resources.

Alpha Ring has not announced the official business transfer schedule, but it has triggered discussions between venture capital and the energy industry.

Quote from Gregory Byron Goble

At present, Alpha Ring is invested by the US-based China Economic Cooperation Group. China Economic Cooperation Chairman Liu Yuhuan is very proud of the results of this team and believes it is a major step forward in the global energy innovation competition.

Interesting research group.

A collection of their patent applications maybe worth to have a look at to at least see what they are up to.

See also the earlier post of Lou Pagnucco.

Quote from Jarek

If "deep orbits" are highly relativistic, indeed de Broglie's clock slows down proportionally to gamma = sqrt(1-v^2) (e.g. Hestenes Time zitter ...).
Generally, this was Gryzinski's view of neutron, as described e.g. in Eganova paper: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1547477116020096
But this slowing down does not seem sufficient for quantization condition - that the clock will perform one tick during the closed orbit (?)

Regarding H2+, here is the original 1994 Gryzinski paper: http://www.sciencedirect.com/s…icle/pii/0009261493E1417F
His more recent lecture has a long discussion finally leading to a different model: http://gryzinski.republika.pl/teor7ang.html

It can dynamically change depending on parameters.

Display More

If "deep orbits" are highly relativistic, indeed de Broglie's clock slows down proportionally to gamma = sqrt(1-v^2)

===NOT this way.

electrin is relativistic and coulomb potential is not 1/r because yhis has infinity at =0.

so inside nucleus(proton) positive charge is uniformly distributed

The combination is the correct nuclear physics.

This theory has been proved by experiment.

Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply From Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

(PDF) Novel Cold Fusion Reactor with Deuterium Supply from Backside and Metal Surface Potential Control

PDF | Abstract: - It is proposed that Cold fusion can occur in metal by D+ hopping to T sites with D– on the metal surface. In this mechanism, D+... | Find,…

doi.org

Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

(PDF) Neutron to be Tightly Bound Proton-Electron Pair and Nucleus to be Constituted by Protons and Internal Electrons

PDF | Abstract:-Original nucleus model in the 1920s was internal electron theory that the atomic nucleus is constituted by protons and electrons, and... |…

doi.org

Jarek: The standard model definition of topological charge is nonsense. Charge can only be generated by the law of Faraday not by mathematical fantasies (winding number/helicity). So you have to show a stable flux of EM field lines that is fully (self-) enclosed. Unluckily in standard 3D,t space such a self enclosure is not possible.

Further there must be an equilibrium state between topological charge and magnetic flux given by the Lorenz force law. So what you show is just a temporal excitation of a field.

Further: Any flat surface as Sⁿ is not able to carry homogeneous flux. You always end up with crossing paths what is against basic physics laws. (an electron has a homogeneous charge!) This is e.g. the reason why spherical harmonics for bound states are no physical solutions. These just give a mathematical approximation.

So if you ever want to find a solution look at the single side torus.

Quote from Jarek

I use topological charge as (2,3D) winding number for field restricted to a closed surface - it gives function from the surface to sphere, which has to cover this sphere an integer number of times.

Yes a winding number (2 at least) is a necessary precondition for the form out of charge. But it does not define charge! Charge is proportional to the temporal change of flux! Without change no charge.

Further you have to show that the topology delivers a stable flux that is the same as the topology being a minimal Lagrangian surface. Next you have to show that all forces average to a constant if we exclude oscillating charge that does not exist for particles.

As said any sphere is flat and simply connected thus unstable. The first topology that fulfills all preconditions is the Clifford torus.

Keep also in mind that magnetic flux always has helicity = is not reducible to a point aka monopol. Further magnetic flux travels at light speed - thus topological charge is stationary (relative radially to flux) and hence magnetic moments are not ring currents theses are the mirror of the rotating flux and co-rotating topological charge.

See also SO(4) physics.