Media/News/Video Library-No discussions please

Quote

Research breakthrough shows Cold Fusion could be possible after all.. In a study published in EPJ D researchers led by Francisco Caruso at the Brazilian Center for Research in Physics have shown theoretically how this process would unfold within the strange world of 2D systems – which are literally as they sound.

The principle of every catalysis is constraining bulk geometry of molecules into a surface, which decreases activation barrier of reaction. But we can go even further: from 2D into a 1D: compare my low-dimensional theory of cold fusion: what looks like theoretical impossibility during random 3D collisions within NIF or tocamak plasma (which would require extreme heat and high temperatures) may suddenly look quite feasible during collisions of atoms arranged into lines. Of course the spontaneous arrangement of atoms into lines looks statistically as impossible as spontaneous overcoming of Coulomb barrier - but this miracle still happens within each ordered metal lattice at low temperatures where these two extreme thermodynamic improbabilities cancel mutually - and cold fusion can still run there even at room temperature.. See also: LENR reaction initiated by nanothermite in new US Navy patent

Cold Fusion by Cherenkov Radiation in a Unique Ceramic

(Roshdy G. S. Barsoum, Office of Naval Research):

Please continue Discussion of this here: US Navy new LENR patent application (25/03/2021)

A short writing about LENR:

https://www.technischweekblad.…usie#.YKPv8HQDNGk.twitter

https://translate.google.com/t…ie%23.YKPv8HQDNGk.twitter

Quote from Curbina

IMHO they tried to replicate part of Holmlid's results by simply shooting lasers to Pd hydrides (in reality thy quote many previous laser targetting Pd hydrides papers, and not Holmlid at all)

I don't think that was their plan. Holmlid's experiments don't involve just "shining" a laser on surfaces; since pulsed lasers are used with energies in the the tens to hundreds of milliJoule per 5 nanosecond pulse, the target material in those experiments is usually ablated away (i.e. vaporizes) with visible plasma formation, with results increasing non-linearly with laser pulse energy.

Quote from Curbina

Open access paper can be read/downloaded here:

https://iopscience.iop.org/art…755-1315/772/1/012038/pdf

A bit careless done. The SEM/EDS after Hydrogen loading is missing. We do not know whether/how much of the surface changes come from transported contamination.

Also a quantitative measurement would be needed to spot down the transmutation reaction. Obviously some transmuted elements are not shown.

It seems learning all this will take time, and more of them to study

Взаимодействие с другими людьми

Quote from Alan Smith

Why the sun's atmosphere is hundreds of times hotter than its surface

The visible surface of the sun, or the photosphere, is around 6,000°C. But a few thousand kilometers above it—a small distance when we consider the size of the sun—the solar atmosphere, also called the corona, is hundreds of times hotter, reaching a million degrees celsius or higher.

This spike in temperature, despite the increased distance from the sun's main energy source, has been observed in most stars, and represents a fundamental puzzle that astrophysicists have mulled over for decades.

In 1942, the Swedish scientist Hannes Alfvén proposed an explanation. He theorized that magnetized waves of plasma could carry huge amounts of energy along the sun's magnetic field from its interior to the corona, bypassing the photosphere before exploding with heat in the sun's upper atmosphere.

The theory had been tentatively accepted—but we still needed proof, in the form of empirical observation, that these waves existed. Our recent study has finally achieved this, validating Alfvén's 80 year-old theory and taking us a step closer to harnessing this high-energy phenomenon here on Earth.

https://phys.org/news/2021-05-…m_campaign=daily-nwletter

Display More

You wrote - "The visible surface of the sun, or the photosphere, is around 6,000 ° C. But a few thousand kilometers above it — a small distance when we consider the size of the sun — the solar atmosphere, also called the corona, is hundreds of times hotter, reaching a million degrees celsius or higher. " You have no proof of this statement !!! And this is a problem for all physics ... Someone blurted out about it without thinking or thinking wrongly, and everyone began to repeat this nonsense on distillation ... Where are the "roots" of these delusions? The origins begin in the 19th century with the physicist Carnot - it was with him that the concept of "heat" began ... More than 160 years have passed ... We received new knowledge and we made CONCLUSIONS - the concept of heat as a "collision of molecules" is erroneous! This is not what characterizes warmth! What about? And heat is characterized by photons, temperature is characterized by photons. And a photon has a mass ... What kind of photons characterize heat? Infrared photons, light photons, ultraviolet photons ... But X-ray photons do not characterize heat ... And at the same time, both photons are emitted by electrons ... Thus, one state of an electron is responsible for heat, and its other state - when it emits X-ray photons, is not responsible for heat ... It is amazing, but the fact ... What is the reason? And the reason is in the size of these photons ... And the fact that an X-ray photon is emitted only by a free electron, and at the same time it is able to fly without interacting with bound electrons ... air, water, but at the same time interacts with calcium - as an example, and therefore we can see the human skeleton on an X-ray ... Think about it - the X-ray photon at the same time characterizes the temperature according to Wien's law -

λf = rf = 2.898 • 10-3 m • ° K / T ° K

Take, for example, an X-ray photon - 6 • 10 ^ -9 m, then we get -

T = 2.898 • 10-3 m • T ° / 6 • 10 ^ -9 m = 483000 ° K

Why does a person not burn out from such a temperature? And it shouldn't burn ... So this photon is simply absorbed or undergoes the Compton effect ... That's all ... Thank you for your understanding!

RT=Russia Today=Propaganda and Desinformation sponsored by Putin=

Not a credible source of information = not helpful to the goal to propagate the benefits and potential of lenr

robert godes doesnt watch rt..

but does watch LF

Quote from Cherepanov2020

Взаимодействие с другими людьми

You wrote - "The visible surface of the sun, or the photosphere, is around 6,000 ° C. But a few thousand kilometers above it — a small distance when we consider the size of the sun — the solar atmosphere, also called the corona, is hundreds of times hotter, reaching a million degrees celsius or higher. " You have no proof of this statement !!! And this is a problem for all physics ... Someone blurted out about it without thinking or thinking wrongly, and everyone began to repeat this nonsense on distillation ... Where are the "roots" of these delusions? The origins begin in the 19th century with the physicist Carnot - it was with him that the concept of "heat" began ... More than 160 years have passed ... We received new knowledge and we made CONCLUSIONS - the concept of heat as a "collision of molecules" is erroneous! This is not what characterizes warmth! What about? And heat is characterized by photons, temperature is characterized by photons. And a photon has a mass ... What kind of photons characterize heat? Infrared photons, light photons, ultraviolet photons ... But X-ray photons do not characterize heat ... And at the same time, both photons are emitted by electrons ... Thus, one state of an electron is responsible for heat, and its other state - when it emits X-ray photons, is not responsible for heat ... It is amazing, but the fact ... What is the reason? And the reason is in the size of these photons ... And the fact that an X-ray photon is emitted only by a free electron, and at the same time it is able to fly without interacting with bound electrons ... air, water, but at the same time interacts with calcium - as an example, and therefore we can see the human skeleton on an X-ray ... Think about it - the X-ray photon at the same time characterizes the temperature according to Wien's law -

λf = rf = 2.898 • 10-3 m • ° K / T ° K

Take, for example, an X-ray photon - 6 • 10 ^ -9 m, then we get -

T = 2.898 • 10-3 m • T ° / 6 • 10 ^ -9 m = 483000 ° K

Why does a person not burn out from such a temperature? And it shouldn't burn ... So this photon is simply absorbed or undergoes the Compton effect ... That's all ... Thank you for your understanding!

Display More

we all know - I assume - that it isn't actually millions of degrees there - there is some sort of emission

Mills makes the point that the CO absorption band at 4.7um cannot exist above 4000K

He has a plausible mechanism and the emissions and spectra he makes in his lab.

How does the H* mechanism account for these transitions and spectra?