Hotson reexamines Dirac's equation-- link

  • Thanks to Terry Blanton posting at Vortex, here is a link to two Infinite Energy articles by D. L. Hotson showing clearly when and where the physics we know [and may love] began to fail. It relates to the then "new" paradigm removing the concept of Lorentz' "aether" and the development of the "Standard Model" or "Standard Theory" which is very much still in force. So in Hotson's clearly expressed view, the problem begins in the 1930s and persists to this day. He argues there was a somewhat later adopted "blindspot" superimposed on what was Dirac's original relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation. That blindspot essentially ignoring half of what is reality in order to save the Standard Model. This is a compelling re-examination by Hotson which details numerous incongruities and inconsistencies and other deficiencies in the Standard Model. The clarity which is brought back by Dirac's full and original relativistic wave equation is clearly described in two successive Infinite Energy articles, both included in the link below:


    https://drive.google.com/file/…Eg4T25LS0FQM3c/view?pli=1

  • Yet an other nutball.


    Yes, we know, Dirac equation is not complete. Yes, we know, qm is not complete. Yes we know standard model has something wrong.


    But what does he offer in place? Something, that is not even wrong.


    A common crackpot practise.

  • Thanks to Terry Blanton posting at Vortex, here is a link to two Infinite Energy articles by D. L. Hotson showing clearly when and where the physics we know [and may love] began to fail. It relates to the then "new" paradigm removing the concept of Lorentz' "aether" and the development of the "Standard Model" or "Standard Theory" which is very much still in force. So in Hotson's clearly expressed view, the problem begins in the 1930s and persists to this day. He argues there was a somewhat later adopted "blindspot" superimposed on what was Dirac's original relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation. That blindspot essentially ignoring half of what is reality in order to save the Standard Model. This is a compelling re-examination by Hotson which details numerous incongruities and inconsistencies and other deficiencies in the Standard Model. The clarity which is brought back by Dirac's full and original relativistic wave equation is clearly described in two successive Infinite Energy articles, both included in the link below:


    https://drive.google.com/file/…Eg4T25LS0FQM3c/view?pli=1


    Bringing this to the top again, since the Hotson articles do show much of possible interest for LENR.

  • Maybe, but at least they show a lot of ignorance in physical theories, missing both relevant content and also understanding of historical context.

  • Maybe, but at least they show a lot of ignorance in physical theories, missing both relevant content and also understanding of historical context.


    Quite the contrary. Do you want people to avoid learning of this? What is your motive there? "They" [Hotson} bring many otherwise unexplainable phenomena under the Standard Model into understandable view. And "their" approach is as rich in historical context as any I have read.


    Read both articles all the way through, please.

  • Have said this before, the recipe is (somewhat modified):


    1. Take an obsolete idea used by someone famous a long time ago, say, P.A.M. Dirac would be perfect
    2. Misunderstand everything you read
    3. Add simplistic and/or fantastic ideas of reality
    4. Use the Grind’O’Crackpot at full speed


    There you go. Now you can use it to explain LENR, for example.

  • Have said this before, the recipe is (somewhat modified):


    1. Take an obsolete idea used by someone famous a long time ago, say, P.A.M. Dirac would be perfect
    2. Misunderstand everything you read
    3. Add simplistic and/or fantastic ideas of reality
    4. Use the Grind’O’Crackpot at full speed


    There you go. Now you can use it to explain LENR, for example.


    Well, if that is what you're doing, it explains a lot.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.