Electron Mediated Nuclear Reactions (EMNR) - Andrea Calaon (Terni Conference - Claudio Pace)


  • I would need to carefully study the experimental evidence of Sveinn Ólafsson and Leif Holmlid. I will only make a few general comments on previous finds described in “Neutral multi-MeV/u particles from laser-induced processes in ultra-dense deuterium D(0): accurate two-collector timing and magnetic analysis”


    If your theory cannot explain the Holmlid results, then it needs at least some more work or it might even be a bad theory.


    See


    Sveinn Ólafsson and Leif Holmlid presentation


    http://tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf


    Holmlid’s data and experimental procedures


    https://drive.google.com/file/…mNpczA/view?usp=drive_web

  • Jarek
    Thank you for the reference to the Aharonov-Casher effect, the dual to the Aharonov–Bohm effect. I didn’t know about it. My interpretation is that in both cases, particles, together with their wave function, (or their pilot wave for Hidden Variable people like me …) tell us that their behaviour depends on the entire past history. The potentials in fact carry information about the complete time history, while field are only information about the present. Adding to this what the delayed choice of Wheeler shows, I conclude that the pilot-wave/wave function does not experience time, and we probably are just visitors in a block-universe. Non-locality and EPR is just a consequence of the timeless nature of the pilot-waves/wave function.


    Dear Andrea,
    I completely agree with the Einstein's block universe picture.
    My favorite view is through the Lagrangian formulation (we use from QFT to GRT) - of action optimization: that we can imagine that the Universe/spacetime was attached in the Big Bang in the past and e.g. in a Big Crunch in the future, and the present time is the action optimizing equilibrium between them. I believe that that non-intuitiveness of QM (like violation of Bell inequalities) comes from this living in kind of 4D jello, which is CPT symmetric.


    I also agree with the dependence on the entire history, like in Couder's explanation of tunneling - this extremely complex state determines crossing the barrier (all links: http://www.thenakedscientists.…m/index.php?topic=46639.0 ).
    Another effect of wave nature are all kind of interference effects - in Couder's double slit experiment, the corpuscle travels one path, while its coupled wave travels all paths, piloting the corpuscle.
    Finally the last (?) of these fundamental wave effects is orbit quantization - again very nicely presented by Couder's droplets: the particle's internal clock kind of finds the resonance with the field - so it can oscillate in uniform way (low energetic):


    However, these are still very subtle effects - while fusion requires a brutal overcoming of Coulomb repulsion - how do you want to achieve it?

  • @Jarek
    I see I have troubles explaining the attraction mechanism.
    The original description is probably better than my babbling:
    https://mospace.umsystem.edu/x…ngNucleons.pdf?sequence=1


    It has nothing to do with the effect of a static magnetic field on a magnetic dipole. It is due to the "very nature" of the nucleons: their internal structure as made of moving charges. The movement of these charges generates a magnetic dipole moment that should manifest as well as a VERY RAPIDLY oscillating magnetic field around the particle, clearly without the radiative therm, otherwise the energy would immediately disperse.
    There is no speculation about what causes the structure of the particles in the first place.

  • @axil
    Thank you for the directory with all works of Holmlid and Olafsson!!


    You say

    Quote

    If your theory cannot explain the Holmlid results, then it needs at least some more work or it might even be a bad theory.


    My theory could well have no roots in reality.
    In the case of Holmlid and Olafsson I haven't read all their production on the ultra-dense deuterium, but my sensation is now that their interpretation tends to be quite mixed with the experimental results, and that this interpretation is somehow self-referencial. This only for ultra-dense D.


    The neutral particles suggested by my theory are actually flying around.
    The energy coincidence between the K orbital and the laser used is striking. It could well be the simplest way to generate Hyd so far: K-doped Fe2O3, deuterium/hydrogen in gas form, 532 [nm] laser!


    Their latest results seem to suggest that the neutral particles can generate along the path between the detectors other particles (decay or reaction?) that have higher speeds and are even more numerous. I will have to think about this to see if the Hyd could plausibly react along the path with some nuclei and generate faster particles as described. Plus radio emissions and other evidences ...
    Let me think about it.
    Ciao

  • <a href="http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/User/386-acalaon/">@acalaon</a>


    How do you explain the 10 billion K-mesons coming from the Holmlid experiment using a laser shot?


    Andrea Calaon


    Quote: “There is no suggestion of energy concentration beyond common thermodynamic limits.”


    Explain how Holmlid sees fragments of hydrogen with energies up to 50 MeV.


    Why do you think it needs a physical explanation?

  • I have been thinking about something similar for the past week, if we look at the problems with dark matter and dark energy, could it be because the frames or blocks that make up the effects for gravity in galaxy clusters are being caused by 10 frames in the future and ten in the past since we are suppose to make up only 5% of the universe in are current block or frame. At the quantum level we would see the least effect and at the largest scale the highest effect on gravity. Another point, how much information could an electron hold at it's energy level? I will have to admit you guys are the greatest!, you keep me on my toes and keep me thinking!! Thanks.

  • The Plasmoid school of LENR theory holds that LENR is caused by a kind of ball lightning. From this school comes the idea that electrons rotating in a closed loop are at the core of LENR causation.


    The limitation of this theory is that the Pauli Exclusion Principle limits how dense the plasmoid can become because electrons repel each other. The polariton waveform removes this limitation because light converts the electron into a boson when the photon becomes entangled with the electron. The polariton can become extremely dense because it is mostly light.


    All theories of LENR causation through the actions of electrons suffer from the limitation on the power concentration that the fermion nature of the electron imposes.


    E. Lewis, Matsumoto and K. Shoulders are among the developers of this fundamental idea for LENR causation, that is a confined EMF waveform is at the bottom of the LENR reaction. All the other causes of the LENR reaction that experimenters have proposed over the years are emergent and are derived from the rotating balls of light that the early workers in LENR have rightly identified as basic.

  • www.davidreneke.com/new-resear…wards-inside-black-holes/


    Ref: Dark Energy, Dark Matter and the block-universe
    How about frames being similar to holograms and decay like radioactivity (half-life), so instead of 10 frames future and past and infinite number with less info the further back or forward.
    Have you ever cut a small section out of a hologram? The image is still there but not as 3D as before, we would be looking at it as a 4D hologram or maybe 4D holographic jello!

  • @AlainCo
    Sometimes I need some time to comment ...
    Thank you Alain for:

    • your support on this thread,
    • the suggestion of my theory to to Dr. Olafsson,
    • the important suggestion that my theory can (at least qualitatively) explain the vast experimental findings of Anatoly Klimov and his group,(I was at ICCF19 as you, but unfortunately did not take the chance to exchange ideas with Dr. Klimov),
    • the suggestion of putting Hydronion on the LENR mug!

    I recently noticed that my theory was appreciated by DOUG MARKER as well:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.i…-lenr-notes-and-info.html

  • @MikeFid


    Your intuition is right on the button.


    LENR is caused by micro black holes. First, we must understand what a micro black hole is. It is any waveform that is confined in a cavity or on a surface of a metal where there is a sharp interface layer that separates the enclosed waveform from its surrounding. The scientific term that discribes this type of waveform is an analog black hole. It is analog because it is like the big black holes in the cosmos. Once a polariton enters the analog black hole it cannot come out again.


    A polariton soliton (PD) is such a knot of electromagnetic waveform. This structure is a dualism that shares all the laws, behaviors and characteristics of it big brothers out in the cosmos. One of its most interesting charactoristics is the PS impact on time. LENR is a catalitic process. A catalyst changes the speed at which a chemical reaction occurs, it speeds the chemical reaction up. The catalyst forms micro black holes that actually affect the flow of time. Outside the PS, time flows at an accelerated pace, but inside time slows down. String theory has a name for the inside of a black hole, they call it a tachyon. An string theory makes predictions on what a tachyon will do; and those predictions look like they accurately predict what is actually happening in high energy LENR experiments.


    The history of LENR is replete with photographs of strange particles and radiations coming out of the LENR ash products. These tracks are the paths of tachyons that has become so full of energy that they can live on their own away from the cavity or surface that gave them birth.


    These black holes are complex things that have a hydra like relationship with their environment. They have three interfaces as follows: entanglement, a monopole magnetic beam, and sub atomic particle creation. Which one of these interfaces predominate is based on the level of PS energy content.


    Entanglement(weak energy content):


    A very weak PS just uses its ability to entangle particles and atoms to produce effects. This weak level is seen in microbes and inside living cells that produce biological based LENR transmutation. This interface is based on the teleportation of energy between atomic processes outside the PS and the inside of the PS. The inside of the PS is an energy clearing house where an energy based quantum mechanical process redistribute energy around the LENR system. This interface stops nuclear radiation from being produced and thermalizes high energy radiation that usually come from nuclear transmutation. The PS is formed on the nanowire that covers the surface of some types of bacteria.


    https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic…ztxkavH3IZrMdaokuUHkdFAuA


    There is a very special type of entanglement that black holes produce; it is called multi-particle entanglement. This interface can combine many atoms together where many atoms can fuse into a single product. But this interface can produce many resulting fusion reactions produced in a single instant. The term for this is "cluster fusion" as seen in LENR experimentation. As the energy content of the PS grows, the entanglement does not go away. This interface stays around no matter how much energy that the PS gathers into itself.


    https://www.quantamagazine.org…04/OctopusWormhole_v1.jpg



    In a LENR system, billions of PSs can coexist together in something called a Bose condensate. It is a network of PS s the share energy amoung themselves and communicate through entanglement. This arrangement leads to some strange things happening. One of these things is that energy can be absorbed in huge chunks. The scientific term for this is super-absorption. Conversely, huge chunks of energy can be produced in an instant with each member of the Bose condensate giving an small but equal share, this is called superradiance. Entanglement is the energy communication network used whereby each PS can work together.

  • Magnetic monopole beam (intermediate energy level)


    The monopole magnetic beam becomes pronounced at polariton soliton (PS) intermediate energy levels since the Surface plasmon polariton (SPP) alignes all the spins of the polaritons inside the soliton to project out of the soliton from its center perpendicular to its direction of wave rotation.


    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gkYg…s1600/Sin+t%C3%ADtulo.png




    This beam also produces entanglement between the PS and the atoms that beam touches. This beam can increase in strength to a huge level and can reach out of the soliton for a distance of up to 100 microns. This beam can produce nuclear disruption which can be described as a quark gluon plasma on the atoms that it falls upon.


    When this beam is initiated before a Bose condensate is established in the LENR system. The power that it transfers to the PS can be too great for the single or even a small aggregation of entangled PSs to hold. In this event, the energy from the nuclear reaction initiated by the beam is sent to the far field as gamma radiation and neutrons. This radiation outflow sometimes occurs during startup or shutdown of a LENR system or when a LENR system is cold since a large scale Bose condensate has not had enough time to become established or is being degraded.


    The beam and Rydberg matter


    Because of its particular shape, there is a symbiotic relationship or better said, a marriage between the PS and rydberg matter.


    http://i1.rgstatic.net/figure/…95936360462@1440787409334



    In rydberg matter, there are planes of atoms that stack in long chains along the entire length of length of the rydberg matter crystal from tip to tail.


    A PS forms on each plane throughout the entire length of the nanowire. These PSs are all entangled in a self contained Bose condensate within the nanowire crystal and their magnetic monopole beams are additive to both be parabolically reflected to the front by each plane of atoms and be projected toward the front end of the crystal.


    http://imagebank.osa.org/getIm…xvZS0xNS0xMS02NTc2LWcwMDI



    The water crystal is also built up from planes of OH atoms formed in long strings. This type of rydberg matter nanowire is produced in exploding cavitation bubbles and is responsible for the LENR reactions seen in cavitation.


    http://imagebank.osa.org/getIm…SxvZS0yMi01LTUyMjgtZzAwNQ



    Rydberg hydrogen is a type II superconductor at high temperatures. The superconductivity comes from the SPP solitons that cover the rydberg hydrogen from tip to tail. The solitons form a high temperature Bose condensate on the nanowire. All the solitons are entangled to form a condensate.The same mechanism produces the drop in resistance in wire used in producing the LENR reactions where patches of Bose condensation forms along the wire.

  • @acalaon


    The flaw in the Electron Mediated Nuclear Reactions (EMNR) theory is that electrons are fermions subject to coulomb repulsion and the pauli exclusion principle(PEP). This places a limit on how electrons can aggregate.


    The electron must be converted into a boson where the restrictions of the PEP can be circumvented. This permits Bose condensation to apply.


    Please see this video that shows how electrons can be converted to a boson and why LENR is always accompanied by light interaction.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • @axil
    You appear to be quite skilled in speculative physics (more than me), but I am not sure you have read my presentation.
    I am not proposing an attraction between electrons. I am proposing an attraction between an electron and a hydrogen nucleus.
    Clustering of Hyd, which would require some attraction between electrons, is a hypothesis which is not at the base of the theory and is not needed to explain the phenomenology of LENR. I haven't even investigated it properly.


    Anyway, using the "Dallacasa attraction mechanism" between electrons could be part of the explanation of the electron pairing in both conventional and high temperature superconductivity, and would explain why it has been so far impossible to find a satisfactory explanation for high temperature superconductors. This is however a purely speculative thought. When electron pairing takes place, as you say, an as in the BCS theory, each couple of fermions becomes a boson, its statistic changes and all couples can fall into the same quantum state. Macroscopic coherence, like in laser light.
    One should probably see how a pair of electrons with opposite spins could couple (through the magnetic mechanism of Dallacasa) with the positive charges of the reticulum. As you say, having equal charges, the two electrons repel each other, and will remain at a distance which is modulated by the location of the positive charges. If the positive charges (the nuclei) "resonate" with the precession of the electrons (which modulates the attractive force of Dallacasa at low frequencies) the system made of electron pair and the crystal could become an eigen-function ... It would explain superconductivity.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.