A letter to Keith-Fredericks

Keith Fredericks has verified the experiment that shows strange radiation in LENR.

Regarding Geneste's paper, the 'strange radiation' tracks described were replicated by Keith Fredericks and reported at ICCF18:

http://www.ecoinventions.ca/ic…s-possibility-of-tachyon/

Keith Fredericks' analysis suggested they might be superluminal tachyons.

I would like to suggest something else.

These tracks are produced by analog black holes called "dark mode surface plasmon polaritons" (dark mode SPP). From nanoplasmonics, it is well known that these polariton solitons produce monopole magnetic fields. Being a black hole, the inside of the soliton contains negative energy due to the fact that loads of magnetic power is being projected as an anapole magnetism beam. This power projection segregates the vacuum into positive and negative energy.

See

Negative energy here

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.…energy/negativeenergy.htm

Things that travel in negative vacuum go faster than light in a neutral vacuum as found in the laser probes used in the EMdrive experiments.

See here

http://www.techtimes.com/artic…ter-than-light-travel.htm

"NASA is currently studying the technology for future applications, but few expected anything like this to happen: according to a post over at the NASA Space Flight forums, when a team of researchers fired lasers into the resonance chamber, the particles were accelerated to astronomical speeds...with some moving even faster than the speed of light."

Hawking radiation will easily entangle these solitons and also help to produce negative vacuum energy.

The huge power content of these solitons come from a positive feedback mode between the soliton and the site of nuclear transformation.

Nanoplasmonics explains these solitons and how they project a monopole magnetic beam. In fact I have a experimental micrograph of this beam.

Keith Fredericks estimation of the power content of the soliton of 64 GeV puts the anapole magnetic field in range for it to produce muons and mesons born from the vacuum pair production as seen by Holmlid and the quark soup produced in the LeClair cavitation experiments.

For and overview on this subject see as follows:

"A freed polariton soliton" in the LENR forum.

A freed polariton soliton

This soliton mechanism is already well defined in physics and I have the papers to show you. Every one of the experimental observations except the superluminal speed of light is standard science and is well understood in science.

Also see

Low Energy Generation
of the "Strange" Radiation
Ivoilov N.G.
Kazan State University, physical dept

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/c…CCF11/pres/81-Ivoilov.pdf

Why would a SPP as a black hole look like a tachyon?

http://phys.org/news/2015-09-l…odynamic-black-holes.html

Because the area of future and past holographic screens increases in different directions, the direction of time is different for the two types of screens. In past screens, time moves forward. Expanding universes, such as ours, involve past holographic screens, and so we naturally perceive thermodynamic time as running forward. In contrast, time runs backward in future holographic screens. In a sense, this interpretation has the odd result that thermodynamic time runs backward inside black holes and collapsing universes.

In a SPP as a black hole would look like a tachyon which is a particle that is traveling backward in time.

In the 1967 paper that coined the term, Feinberg proposed that tachyonic particles could be quanta of a quantum field with negative squared mass. However, it was soon realized that excitations of such
imaginary mass fields do not in fact propagate faster than light, and instead represent an instability known as tachyon condensation.Nevertheless, negative squared mass fields are commonly referred to as "tachyons", and in fact have come to play an important role in modern physics.

The SPP as a black hole would be a tachyon containing negative mass and moving backward in time.