ISCMNS Workshop in Airbus Toulouse - Feedback

I have Feedback from LENR-Cities CEO ( @Michel Vandenberghe) about the conference in Toulouse.

As we can see from the published agenda of the conference, there was strong participation of French scientists, with participation of Jean-Paul Biberian, many theoreticians, but also of a veteran, Jacques Dufour (see "Unconventional Heat Observation in the Hydrogen/Iron/Sodium System"). Russians were well represented too.

Jean-Francois Geneste beside his two theoretical presentations, presented against his "Challenge", that he launched at LENR-Cities/LENRG event in Milan :
LENRG G-Day Milano : Airbus and LENR
(I will make a separate post on that)

Many of the Russian presentations were also présented at ICCF19.

According to some, the most "sexy" presentation was done by @fabrice DAVID , so I expect a report from him :evilgrin: (and the paper ).

In the room, there was among others, the CEO of Neofire, the CEO of Hydrofusion, and the "business developer" of Brillouin.Swedish (Lundin or Lidgren) and Canada was also represented.
There was also , Michael McKubre quite Discrete. He was surprised, and impressed by the number of French LENR scientists presents. (this is where every French say Cocorico ).
At the end he made a small talk, not far from ICCF19 :

• He said there was many corporations ready to invest mountains of money, as soon as the game is unlocked.
• Then he repeated again, like during ICCF19, the importance of "collaboration" in the domain. (Michel Vandenberghe took it as a positive word for initiatives like LENR-Cities for their work, and as the need to create scientific ecosystem)

The conference was well organised, with a visit of A380 assembling hall, and a nice evening on Thursday where people could exchange freely in a nice ambiance.

EDIT: Michael McKubre did not talk of LENR-Cities or Ecosystem, but his talk about need of collaboration resonated so to Michel.

@David Fojt made a report to Peter Gluck on Ego-Out blog
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.r…11-report-more-daily.html

many points raised, on Airbus and JF geneste, of Airbus application, of Russian contribution.
David made a link between Geneste's theory and Couannier's theory.

About McKubre talk:

Quote

Mike McKubre- has said that today not money is the mot difficult problem but how to find open minded people willing to invest in LENR. California in the US is a good place, many laboratories there have money.

There is also few comments, on Jacques Ruer about transition phases in alloys, and a French scientists about increasing holes in the lattice. It may interest replicators.

Rossi's works seems respected but the problem to replicate E-cat/Parkhomov is important...

A report to read on peter's blog !

The negative result is a negative.
It shows something is missing.

Biberian on his 20 failures explained that it is normal for scientific experiments to have such number of failures. They were caused by prosaic problems like coil melting.
The presentation by Biberian was made to warn the replicators about the various difficulties, and the interest of a flow calorimeter.

YES science is hard, it requires patience and care.

Note that one key question on the cause of Parkhomov replication failure is about the nickel treatment.
Rossi in his patent talk of treatment to increase permeability, something like baking wetted nickel.

David Fojt report exchange with a scientist on that subject... unclear.

Anyone knowing the early development of semiconductors find that banal.

Peter Gluck reports more information of the Workshop :
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.r…r-war-will-be-won-on.html

There is again the idea of a convergence between Urutskoev's and Geneste's theory.

There was also a presentation of Vladimir Dubink on "Nano-breather".

Quote

A reader has informed us "Please note that Vladimir Dubinko's paper was 'speed' presented during the workshop, worked in on the fly, regarding nano-breathers. It was not in the initial electronic files attendees received but shall be included in a distribution of final proceedings. His same or similar paper was presented in Padua, but at the workshop, with fewer attendees and less quantity of activity going on, seemed to get more attention. Dubinko communicates his ideas very well."

I have attended his presentation in ICCF19, and yes the presentation are clear. My personal intuition is that emerging phenomenon like discrete breather are one key to LENR. but who knows...

Jean paul-Biberian just publish an article in French about the conference.
http://blogde-jeanpaulbiberian…airbus-sur-la-fusion.html (Google translated)

paragraph are very short for each point and it seems easy to read in googlish.

I extract few point that I find especially interesting :

Quote

Jean-François Geneste in his introduction explained that LENR ([lexicon]Low Energy Nuclear Reactions[/lexicon]) have possible applications in aviation and space. He announced that they had a sound engine that could be used to confirm the results of a cold fusion generator. For this, it would have to generator has a Coefficient of Performance of at least three and a temperature of 700 ° C.

Jacques Dufour, used a powder composed of sodium, iron and SiC at a pressure of 7 atmospheres of hydrogen to 1075 ° C in a differential scanning calorimeter. He received an excess of 0.5 Watt. He observed excess corresponds to what is expected of its pico-chemistry theory.

Korshunov, the Russian Academy of Sciences has tried to reproduce the experience of Parkhomov with a mass flow calorimeter. He tried different types of heating, with a dc winding, pulsed, etc. It was limited to a maximum temperature of 800 ° C, and got no excess heat.

The final comment is double meaning:

Quote

A total of 9 French made presentations, which is very encouraging given the situation in France