I have tried not to be insulting and attempted to summarize what is said as fairly as possible. Nevertheless, the arrogance of the replies is clear.
For example, Cude claims I do not know what a "volt" is. I quote Wikipedia below. Note the term electromagnetic FORCE. This is the nature of the phenomenon we call a volt, which is measured in different ways. Initially, it was measured as the FORCE exerted between two plates on which the same charge was applied. The amount of charge determines the amount of FORCE. I suggest Cude and the others refrain from personal comments especially since they frequently have no idea what they are talking about.
The temperature is a measure of the energy contained in a material using the heat capacity to store the energy. It is also related to the amount of vibration experienced by the atoms. Temperature and voltage are not related or equal in any way, which was the point I tried to get across.
As Eric points out, fractofusion and LENR are not related in any way. Fractofusion produces the nuclear products produced by hot fusion. In contrast, LENR does not produce these nuclear products or involve the same mechanism. Fractofusion is easy to trigger. LENR is not easy to cause.
As for the evidence describing LENR, it ranges from the trivial to as close to certainty as we get in science. The skeptics seem to focus on the trivial end of the spectrum while the believers concentration on what is very certain. The important question is ,"Is LENR a real phenomenon or not"? This question has a clear black or white answer. The skeptic seem to say, "it may be true or it may not, we simply do not know, but we will act as if it does not exist while looking for all the reasons we can imagine to support this conclusion". In contrast, I assembled all known information in two books, tested the behavior in the lab and concluded that LENR is real. This experience seems to have no importance to the skeptics. My effort now is to explain how it works. This goal is too far removed from how the skeptics think to allow effective communication.
I find a difference between teaching in a class room and on the internet. In the classroom, arrogance would get the student kicked out of class and lack of doing any serious thinking or home work would fail the student. No such incentive to learn is present on the internet. Consequently, very little learning takes place. Simple asking the same questions that have been answered already and then complaining about the lack of answers is not learning.
"The volt (symbol: V) is the derived unit for electric potential, electric potential difference (voltage), and electromotive force.[4] The volt is named in honor of the Italian physicist Alessandro Volta (1745–1827), who invented the voltaic pile, possibly the first chemical battery."