Successful replication of Alexander Parkhomov ?

    • Official Post

    No vakkuum (((all homemade equipment .. The Middle Ages (((Check for
    good equipment -.. Do better and share the results of all will be good!.
    Of course there is KOH.


    Open cell, hydrogen is passed, slightly enriched D.


    Google translator changes the meaning :(. Sorry.


    There is quite a language barrier. Could you explain what you did, all experimental parameters and so on to e.g. @Peter Gluck
    than he could give us a proper english translation. Thanks for the great work!

  • When the effect is obviously going on and the power is reduced because there is a constant glow?


    Reactor much heat insulated. Power supply is small enough. The reactor was lit inside the heat insulation. Photos taken after the removal of the insulation.


    In the last experiment, the thermocouple was far enough away from the hot zone. Thermocouple temperature does not exceed 600 degrees Celsius. I worked for about 5 minutes with an excess of heat (a sharp drop in capacity) to a spiral fracture.


    Make sure it works - very simple. Maximum Week takes to the preparation of materials. Dear replicators, spend a little time and make sure. May
    not work for a long time (as in Russia and Parkhomov and Lenz and
    others - worked for a long time) to failure, you will have the
    confidence that everything is working. Finally, stop feeding the trolls groundless critics.


    There is quite a language barrier. Could you explain what you did, all experimental parameters and so on to e.g. Peter Gluck
    than he could give us a proper english translation.


    It will be better when the questions in the column. For each answer.

  • 2. Fuel is packed into a metal pipe photo: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/1.jpg


    If have speculated here in this forum that the Exotic Neutral Particle (ENP) that produces the LENR effect is mobile and can penetrate and pass through the material that most replicators use to confine that ENP and the LENR reaction.


    An iron pipe might be an absolute requirement as a method of LENR confinement. If you remember, Rossi uses steal sheets in the structural material in his wafer.


    I also wonder if a grounding wire is affixed to that pipe, can a current to ground be detected in that grounding wire?


    Rossi claims to produce electrostatic based current flow in his wafer based reactor.


    It would be an easy conformation of overunity if a current to ground is detected that is greater in magnitude than that used as input current.

  • @s_grey


    I wonder if it would be possible for the ash produced in one of your reactor tests could be placed on a sheet of photo enlargement paper to check for the presence of any Exotic Neutral Particles that are coming from that ash. Black and white would do fine.


    see


    Ilford 5x7 Multigrade 1M B&W Paper, Glossy Surface, 25 sheets
    by Ilford
    Price:$9.99 + $4.99 shipping




    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009R6FA/ref=s9_zwish_hd_bw_bE3Hr_g229_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-11&pf_rd_r=00TJJE8RRG84M16RRNY9&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=ccb04e88-be55-5aa6-a99e-a3d7c85440de&pf_rd_i=3349231

  • I also wonder if a grounding wire is affixed to that pipe, can a current to ground be detected in that grounding wire?


    One time had a thermocouple kontachit catalyst. There were disturbances. About as here: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/ener…12_.15_800-1300-400s_.jpg
    After the measure between the earth and the mixture - except pickups from PWM nothing noticeable. During the measurement of PWM is not cut off.


    Photo paper does not try. The phosphor of the light bulb daylight does not respond. I watched in complete darkness.
    Another reactor tube is ready. It remains to wait for drying. A few days will continue to experience.
    http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20160213_1.jpg

  • @Tarun
    Now that you have a working reactor, are you planning to do proper calorimetry?


    A sense calorimetry? it does not convince skeptics. For me - the main attitude of the spent energy to produce heat. Suffice rough estimations. The objective is to provide itself with warm, not someone something to prove. It is useless to argue. Zemelvaysa effect, he argued the same truths, 20 years proved that if to wash their hands before surgery the mortality rate drops sharply. He put in a psychiatric hospital "luminary of science", just like here. Skeptics written sheets with proof of why it does not work, but others do.

    While fully operating reactor there. All the while, another experiment soon. If you fall apart - try a tube of graphite. It is neutral with respect to the catalyst.


    The task - to run completely self-supporting. Those. upon reaching effect - warm to the maximum, to 0 to use an external source. It will be difficult, but I'll try. This is the best proof. Of course, the ideal - to generate steam and then electricity.


    --- То же самое, по русски --


    Now that you have a working reactor, are you planning to do proper calorimetry?
    А смысл в калориметрии? Скептиков она не убедит. Для меня - главное отношение затраченной энергии к полученному теплу. Достаточно грубой прикидки. Задача стоит обеспечить себя теплом, а не кому то что то доказать. Это бесполезно доказывать. Эффект Земельвайса, он то же доказывал прописные истины, 20 лет доказывал, что если мыть руки перед операцией то смертность резко понижается. Его в психушку посадили "светилы науки", прям как тут. Скептики пишут простыни с доказательством, почему это не работает, а другие делают.

    Пока полностью рабочего реактора нет. Все в процессе, очередной эксперимент скоро. Если развалится - попробую трубку из графита. Он нейтрален по отношению к катализатору.


    Задача - запустить полностью на самообеспечении. Т.е. по достижении эффекта - утеплять по максимуму, до 0 потребления с внешнего источника. Очень трудно будет, но постараюсь. Это и будет самым лучшим доказательством. Конечно, самое идеальное - вырабатывать пар, а потом электроэнергию.

  • For calorimetry few possibilities. Going the other way - is very slow rise in temperature, the rate of 1 degree / minute or less. The sharp drop in capacity (it I can learn more -less) even without an increase in temperature argues heat.


    For the accuracy of such a method is not needed. The errors do not matter, they are constant and do not affect.


    For some reason there is heat - is another question. A continuous operation of the reactor it is obviously not the combustion of released hydrogen from a nickel / metal of the reactor tube, or other chemical processes. Within 40 minutes the reactor gave about 100W redundant power. It still remains to change the heater resistance at these temperatures all the drift.

  • "If you fall apart - try a tube of graphite. It is neutral with respect to the catalyst."


    Graphite reacts with molten lithium. Molten lithium eats carbon from steel. Molten alumium eats all metals (LiAlH is difficult. Maybe Rossi dropped alumium away to get for corrosion resistance). As much I have found during few weeks, it is Mg2NiH4 crystals that do work. They need to be in molten alkali metal (lithium is efficient, but others do also) and need EMP pulses to crash hydrogen in crystals lattice. Temperature is not critical but higher reduce little needed EMP energy and may boost hydrogen diffusion to MgNi crystals. 10 bar or more H2 pressure is starting point..
    You may try pure iron pipe with induction heating + insulation and bigger aisi 316 /304 container to hold hydrogen pressure (iron pipe hydrogen embritlement). Iron can hold molten lithium and magnesium, but not alumium. Maybe low carbon nickel less aisi may work too.


    Lithium + alumina is much of extra heat (as Rossi "helped" in irc..) may affect great in calorimetry, but false..


    Do it big enough that false / success is easy to see, but carefull with EMP's after loaded hydrogen full it may be too efficient.. And don't put U238 you got too much gold and neutrons..

  • Was the heat from the "thermal runaway" all accounted for? I'm guessing not. Why sum the energy in and energy out when the assumption is that nothing interesting would be found?


    I'm impressed that ingenuity was substituted for cash by choosing a battery as the source of raw materials. Well done.


    Can the same ingenuity think up a way of measuring heat in/ heat out.? Heat in is easy, VI. Heat out may be measured by removing the heat with air and using the heat to melt ice blocks in a thermos flask. Immersing the experiment in ice could also work as long as sufficiently high temperatures could be achieved.


    Consider a stack of shaking screens, the kind that is used to sort sand into different sizes. If the screen is shaken too vigorously then the particles remain airborne and few pass through the screen. If, however the energy is turned down the sand particles remain in intimate contact with the screen and the sand particles pass through quickly.


    Now consider trying to achieve hydrogen saturation of the nickel. Too high a temperature and the brownian motion keeps the hydrogen "floating" above the nickel. To achieve efficient penetration of the nickel matrix the hydrogen needs to be persuaded to "flow" across the surface of the nickel. In the presence of a voltage to keep it in intimate contact.


    Consider the voltage applied to be in opposition to the brownian motion, the heat applied. Decrease the heat and increase the voltage.

  • This might be useful. <a href="http://www.cobasys.com/pdf/tutorial/inside_nimh_battery_technology.pdf" class="externalURL" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">cobasys.com/pdf/tutorial/inside_nimh_battery_technology.pdf</a>


    The page cannot be found ??


    Link broken or restricted access?

  • @David Fojt:


    A typical composition of the mixture of the nickel battery:
    1. Nickel and nickel hydroxide. Perhaps the added copper.
    2.KOH laced with LIOH
    3. mixture of lanthanides (not a fact! Can be a mixture of other rare earth elements).
    4. Carbon
    5. Other Additives.
    The great thing - the producers have already picked up the components. They need the same hydrogen-absorbing alloy.
    -----
    When lithium hydroxide and washing KOH leave the water. Not all of the remains. Upon heating at about 800 degrees centigrade becomes lithium hydroxide lithium oxide with evolution of water. What else there are probably reaction.
    Yet, when dismantling the battery I have it started to burn in the air. Photo in the topic there.
    -------
    That's all from me for the unavailability of lithium aluminum hydride ;). The battery Ni-Mh is not a bad choice, perhaps there is an "ideal" structure for LENR.


    @Arthur not everyone understood the difficulties of translation.

  • @David Fojt::


    When lithium hydroxide and washing KOH leave the water. no well understood ?
    Flushing KOH and lithium hydroxide and distilled water.
    The mixture part remains.
    Rinsing is not until the end.
    Yes, sure, but maybe, by adding pure Li from lithium button cell battery you could improve the reaction ??
    I can not provide a clean lithium from lithium battery.
    1. It is oxidized in air.
    2. The hydrogen is produced by electrolysis. Water vapor present. Dewatered by passing through Natria chloride. All the same, there is water. In the reactor, it will connect pure lithium anyway.


    Electrolysis.
    White in a bottle - NaCl: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20160110.jpg

  • @David Fojt:
    4. Carbon


    Upon heating at about 800 degrees centigrade becomes lithium hydroxide lithium oxide with evolution of water. What else there are probably reaction.


    Carbothermal reduction of Mg and some KOH when 1000C or more (practical amounts 1250C or more. But if produced metals react somehow reaction can do more.)


    NaCl electrolysis do Cl but have some membrane?


    NiMH battery boys need hydrides, but some of them consume heat and some releases. Do we need both or need to get some lantanides away..?

  • eros:
    NaCl electrolysis do Cl but have some membrane?
    No. Electrolysis of sulfuric acid in the lead electrodes - to produce hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen collect, then passed through a sodium chloride.


    Do we need both or need to get some lantanides away..?
    I use this: http://jivisam.ru/uploads/energia/img_20150826_122330.jpg
    specific composition is unknown.


    You need hydrogen pressure to overdoze NiMh stuff. 10Bar or more.
    Hm.. Effect LENR(???) obtained at atmospheric pressure. Described. Everything is done literally from scrap materials.
    Will not hurry, it is necessary to achieve long-term work on a similar recipe, be sure.


  • Hm.. Effect LENR(???) obtained at atmospheric pressure. Described. Everything is done literally from scrap materials.
    Will not hurry, it is necessary to achieve long-term work on a similar recipe, be sure.


    H2 pressure boost hydride formation. It took long time for manufacturers to develop chemistry that work near atmospheric pressure. (pressure vessel is not consumer product). However if boost pressure it take more H2 in. May help in LENR. Atleast it is claimed that Mg2NiH4 needs 10bar to LENR.


    Scrap is not scrap people that can use it. People that don't have skills see only scrap.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.