Successful replication of Alexander Parkhomov ?

Quote from David Fojt

So let's do it then give us your results.. smile.
In another words from every last replication, powder was still heated by eddy current..

I lack materials and some time. Later when I get some working I'll post, but if someone have needed materials in hands testrig can construct in some hours.. Need some suitable test room to blow out with H2 too. My residental is not good idea..

maybe quartz tube can withstand NiMH stuff long enough. Li will react SiO but Sergei claim was not to use Li. Big halogen lamp tube is maybe usable for some H2 bars enough..

Some theory says stimulation in correct enviroment still needed. Induction is easy to construct. Quartz allow UV light stimulation too but only surface got activation. Induction go deeper. If use metal tubes it sucs most of induction. Some success reports for AISI tubes occur. Maybe some stimulus go through but my understand is that metals should suck stimulus - thin shields maybe not perfect. Still better to avoid metal crucibles.

@'eros
If the right catalyst - it triggers a response from the slightest change in temperature. Last experience was a failure, a short-circuit inside the helix at 1030 degrees.
Signs of reaction is not found and therefore not published.
I make a new one, with a graphite tube.
4-5 days.

Quote from David Fojt

Therefore as beginner you have to catch up some parameters undeniable by LENR specialists here as using for example low pressure during
runs.

It may work in low pressure. But claims say that 1->10bar do reaction 15x faster.

Quote

It seems you aren't an engineer because sorry but you mix too much things about induction heating.

Yeah maybe or maybe not. I don't classify me, others can do. Eh you think engineers are better than others ?
Mix things maybe, you mean that I need use leters MP only instead EMP, not as Mr Maxwell teach?
When write I drop letters that are posible to google/understand - not exact. There are IPR things also to think it is not wise to say
everything, only things that find easilly.
Btw papers say it should be EMP, but success replicators do moustly MP.

Quote

About Rossi, yes his powder is "heated" by induction also this the reason why all part around of his device are builded by amagnetic matters
to concentrate magnetism up to powder.

Make sense if there is room for RF or he use alternating fields. Or IPR things force to use harder way stimulus.

Quote

By this fact, it isn't his target "to heat his powder" , by this way he has researched another behavior............

stimulus. If he make power he need think how to cool it, not heat. Only smallest posible stimulus to get COP.
"Mouse" needs stimulus but give power away in neutrinos.

Quote

Don't focus on complex heating system first rather a big reserve of power by 380V AC.

induction heating is less broblematic as high temp resistors. Only some power fets more. And it can do maybe some stimulus if got things right..

Quote

You talk about how to make "stimulus" , it's better to find how powder could have a better answer from theses "stimulus"..

Wikipedia writes:
"energy is at a specific resonance frequency which depends on the strength of the magnetic field and the magnetic properties of the isotope
of the atoms"

I don't know is this anybody claims, but is so clear that it need to be write net that it not found claims later..

Quote from s_grey

I make a new one, with a graphite tube.

Graphite is good conductor for heat+el. resistor coil insulation maybe hard or maybe should use induction heat?
Graphite can do CO, which do low temp Ni carbonyl. Be carefull. Anyway amounts are small and you had
some Ni experinces before..

CN.pdf paper says that reaction occur in molten Li enviroment. Other alkalis may do also. Your temp 1350C is enough with graphite (from NiMH) to
carbothermal reduction of Li and wapor deposition to Ni grains.
I think that is why you need so much temp. If use some drops Li metal needed temps may drop dramatically.
Or go high temp and do reduction in some hours (vacuum is best) then go hydride generating temp (~300C), load H2 and give EMP:s.
After reduction powder is maybe pyrophoric don't give oxygen or water or it may go unefficient.

In mild temp your equipments may last long and service well.

Btw what you think to use 2000W halogen pipe for reactor tube? It allow 1100C continous surface
(inside can be lot hotter if use induction). Quite cheap 10-12mm quartz tube..?
SiO2 don't resist molten Li or carbon, but may last long enough for exeperiment if not flooded with Li..
https://www.radium.de/en/produ…based-rjh-ts-2000w230cr7s

Oh I forgot don't rinse NiMH stuff well. It wash LiOH and KOH away. They are maybe needed for reaction.

No possibility of induction heating. Even with a powerful power supply problems. maximum power I have 350W-400W ..
The fact that the graphite is combusted in air at a temperature 400 gradusov know. And about the same nickel tetracarbonyl I know. Hood and gas branch tube.
I disassembled the new battery, according to the reaction to fire it did not lithium. And the air is not caught fire. Added with a lithium battery.

Quote from s_grey

No possibility of induction heating. Even with a powerful power supply problems. maximum power I have 350W-400W ..
The fact that the graphite is combusted in air at a temperature 400 gradusov know.

400W should do lot if all go inside material. 2kw induction coocking plates are common too. Quite easy to modify. (I have one, but it have
3hrs timer to shutdown that make it useless. It have temp and power level logic ready, but 3hrs not do and too much work to reverse engineer.
More easy to do from scratch. Or wait delivery from china..)

You can wrap graphite tube to protect it from oxidazing lot. Cement, glass etc. Cloced container may do also, it saturate CO level then stop.

Quote from eros

"Mouse" needs stimulus but give power away in neutrinos.

Can you elaborate?

Quote from Eric Walker

Quote from eros: “"Mouse" needs stimulus but give power away in neutrinos.”
Can you elaborate?

--clip--
Here, the average energy of about 0.84MeV carried out by neutrinos in the H(p, e
+νe)D
--

D2 gas of a fraction of about 1/6000. This
contaminant D2 gas results in an energy released by a factor (1.5 × 10−27)(6000)−2/5.2 ×
10−37 = 80 with respect to the H-H fusion power
--/clip--

And mouse needs more stimulus than cat..

Have you seen number 80 in talk somewhere?

Rossi had this information 2012, maybe earlier.