me356: Celani Ni Wire replication

Quote from monty

gio06: Can you write in english please? Or write in russian and english?

I am laughing so hard. Were you trying to be funny?

@gio06 post, according to translate.google.com, says

"I have an article in Russian, in which I described the process in the reactions of metal - hydride to release excess heat
Unfortunately, I do not know English, so there is no translation of the article into English.

Article Thermodynamic calculations and excessive heat generation mechanism example A.Rossi reactor.

Where can we have this article, as well as in electronic form?

Can you give us a link?"

Quote from hendersonmj

A thermal imaging camera with filters?

It drop question how thermalize efficiently 10G-1Thz? Thermalization show that some energy is present, energy levels/directions can see.
Using hand sensing heat give some information, enough trust that this thing need to check somehow.

But how get frequencies+energies=spectrum 10G-1Thz? Ideas?
I have only ideas how change freguenzy, but I don't know if it works or not if can't see spectrum.

Quote from eros

I dosn't trust any black magic. This is normal high energy physics. I try to avoid gammas, maybe imposible completely but moust I thin posible.
I need some device to check RF frequency range 10Ghz to some Thz. My meter up 8Ghz show nothing.

Hi Eros: As long as we have no agreed theory about all LENR related phenomas, nothing (no LENR experiment) is normal high energy physics.

H* is no black magic. It is a real state of Hydrogen, which at lower orbits is no longer able to radiate in the optical range. Please read the very elaborate theory of Mills at http://brilliantlightpower.com/theory/. This will take some time.

mfp has published a soft gamma spectrum of their reactor. You can find it somewhere in this forum or at theor page:

http://www.quantumheat.org/ind…cookbook-is-in-the-signal

There is more to tell, but take into account:
If You are unlucky, the Darwin award ist looking for frontrunners.

Quote from Wyttenbach

H* (dark hydrogen) a highly possible path to LENR, behaves like a neutron and can undergo "strage reactions" if its not at lowest energy level (-511keV).

Up to date there exists no known (commercial) detectors for "free H*". But H* should have a high magnetic dipole and thus building one shouldn't be a high hurdle.

May be the LENR community should start a project with a target nucleous sensible for H* that a after capuring H* emits a well known soft gamma.

I would run all LENR experiments behind a wall of water. Buy a cheap aquarium!

Display More

The latest MFMP test used neutron bubble detectors to check for fast and slow neutrons. Two huge bubbles appeared during the test in the fast neutron bubble detector.

I wrote MFMP this post to warn them of this danger involving Exotic neutral particles that you describe here as follows:

Quote

MFMP cannot tell if the bubble was formed by a neutron or an exotic neutral particle unless they have detected gamma radiation coming from that bubble. The bubble might have been produced by an exotic neutral particle (ENP) that has escaped from the reactor and catalyzed multiple secondary reactions in the liquid inside the test tube. No detectable radiation from the bubble means that the bubble was caused by a LENR reaction.

If ENPs are floating around the lab, MFMP personnel could be breathing them in an LENR reactions may be happening in their bodies.

I beleive the the ENP might be a nanoparticle of a LENR activated hydride that can exit the hot reactor. MFMP for some reason does not want to shield the reactor with a steel protective shell that can confine hydride nanoparticles from escaping from the reactor. One ENP can catalyze 10s of thousands of LENR reactions. Maybe that is why that bubble is so large.

I also provided MFMP this post about ENPs as follows:

Quote

FYI

If you don't see neutron activation around the device, then the bubbles may not be caused by Neutrons. There are a possible zoo of strange particles involved with LENR, including kaons, pions, muons, and ENPs.

The so called Erzion phenomenon was discovered in a series of electrolytic experiments marked by unexplained changes in a pool of cooling water outside of the catalytic cell. After 40 minutes of electrolytic cell operation, water on the tungsten anode side of the cooling vessel started loosing its transparency.

Water on the stainless steel cathode of the pool of cooling water remained transparent, at the same 40 C temperature. A sample of bubbly water, removed from the anode side, was tested for induced gamma radioactivity. No such radioactivity was found in it; the sample became transparent after 24 hours. Attempts to reproduce the long-term loss of cooling water transparency with other electrolytes, and under different electrical discharge conditions, were not successful. But the effect was highly reproducible when experimenting with the tungsten-anode electrolytic cell and the 7 M KF electrolyte containing 50% of heavy water.

That cooling water on the outside of the electrolytic cell's glass reactor shell at the right side (see Figure 1) is close to the anode while cooling water on the left side is close to the cathode. The disappearance of bubbles, after the electrolysis, was very slow (half-life of about 10 hrs). Attempts to explain the phenomenon in terms of cavitation, and other ultrasonic effects, were not successful. The only satisfactory explanation was possible within the framework of the erzion model. Authors believe that bubbles are produced through the action of neutral Erzions.

The Erzons phenomenon behavior is consistent with the magnetic based Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP). To begin with, the glass container is transparent to the magnetically based ENPs both optically and magnetically. The LENR reaction that keeps the ENPs viable produce the vapor that forms the water bubbles. The ENPs become energetically self sufficient in the water of the cooling pool where the ENPs remain viable for hours.

If the Erzons phenomenon is produced by magnetically based ENPs, an iron plate placed just on the outside of the glass wall adjacent to the anode would prevent the ENPs from exiting the glass electrolytic cell. With the ENPs blocked from travel, bubble production would be eliminated.

Display More

RF findigs come sure. 912-925Mhz 0.6-0.8mW/m² (maybe more sometimes?) periodic hotspot just my working area brr..

Dear Nobody,

Dear Francesco,

thank you very much for your comments!
I am very glad that you are visiting this forum and giving us your knowledge.
It will be pleasure to discuss with you in any way.

Regarding my experiments, I have received all necessary materials. Now I have to construct new reactors and we will see.
One reactor will be 5kW prototype and second one will be utilizing plasma discharge in a non-arcing mode with very high H1 production.

With the utmost respect for Francesco Celani, I believe most (if not all) members of this forum have spent a great deal of personal time following LENR for years and is craving more information (not less) at this very exciting time. And from what I have seen there is an abundance of time during the experiments for communication : )

We are interested in the boring details, do post them.

Yes, boring details are good. We (in the forums) spend half the time talking about E-Cat kerfuffle and Mr. Rossi, and the other half looking at what could be happening from a scientific point of view. I think most if not all understand that it is a real effect. But that the method is not down pat.
The theory can come in time.

Everyone, the more detail the better. The more references the better. The way the Internet is now we can translate anything.
I have nothing better to do than either listen to my wife, or study LENR.

I personally look up almost every reference. Please consider boring is good.
Also to MFMP I do not mind looking at the live tests. But after 4 hours or whenever Youtube thread stops working I can never find the new stream. I can do boring. But the B.S. and insulting people not so much.

@Francesco CELANI
I would like to agree with the others above, we want boring details! @me356 is not the only one attempting to replicate your experiments on this forum (perhaps just the most successful). Myself and other replicators would love to hear boring details. These boring details are often the most challenging and time consuming to get right on experiments.

Dear Colleagues,

for what I can understand, most of You like details, even boring one.

So, don't complain me now, for the latest test, almost failed:

Now we are thinking new procedures to overcome the problem: work in progress.

Thanks for the attention,

Francesco CELANI

@Francesco CELANI: Leif Holmlid applies colloidal graphite (Aquadag) on the surface of the "emitter" (the K:Fe2O3 catalyst) he uses for his experiments. It sounds like it is important for obtaining good results:

http://i.imgur.com/vj8Qt7r.png
http://i.imgur.com/sB0CHfB.png

Dear Ecco (and Colleagues),

*I will inform all of You on the progress about.

* Short comment: sharing information also on "failed" experiments can be useful for the progress of the field.....

Francesco CELANI

I uploaded in attached file your article on the chemical reactions in the device A.Rossi.
Sorry, that is not the subject for the e-cat did it.
I hope will be useful.

excuse my bad English.
my article in Russian and require translation into English

I uploaded in attached file your article on the chemical reactions in the device A.Rossi.
Sorry, that is not the subject for the e-cat did it.
I hope will be useful.

Quote from Francesco CELANI

So, If I well understood Your sentences/quotation (about the Prof. Holmlid work), what it is really necessary is a LOW amount of graphite (hoppefully graphene) to increase the cathalityc proprieties of Fe-K cathalyser (home made at INFN-LNF).

The manual application of a collidal graphite layer like Holmlid does would indeed overcome the issue of coating the entire internal reactor surface with carbon, but my guess is that adding small amounts of a simple hydrocarbon such as methane, perhaps as a preliminary preparation procedure in a separate environment, would potentially work better.

The catalytic cracking of methane on active catalysts (which are generally ceramic/oxide-supported) can occur at relatively low temperatures and form filamentary carbon deposits. This process is also often specifically used for the synthesis of carbon nanotubes.

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ef0101964
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi…1080/15533174.2013.797452
https://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel/preprint archive/Files/47_2_Boston_10-02_0262.pdf

(etc...)