Rossi: We received ERV’s Report - Very pleased with results!

  • Update from Rossi


  • This is the hard beginning of the tough road to energy freedom, and thus freedom from oppression of all kinds. My heart is full of gratitude for the endurance, the faith, and the insight that makes a good man, great. Thank you, Dr. Rossi.

  • Fra nå er tusenvis av eksperter som er kompetente for videreføring av prosjektet. For flere år, Rossi alene vært den som hadde utholdenhet og innsikt for å nå dagens revolusjonerende resultat. Vær ikke Rossi tildelt Nobelprisen for dette, så selv jeg gå å protestere tog :)

  • From now are thousands of experts who are competent for the continuation of the project. For several years, Rossi alone been the one who had PERSISTENCE and insight to reach today's revolutionary result. Be not Rossi awarded the Nobel prize for this, then even I go to protest train :)

  • Don't sell the fur until the bear has been shot.


    Jesus made only one miracle at a time. Here we are talking about three simultaneous miracles like a lame man walking on a lake turned into wine.


    Rossi's three miracles are:


    - Overcoming the Coulomb barrier thus producing nuclear reactions.
    - Those reactions occur without prompt ionizing radiation.
    - No long-lived reaction products are produced.


    Anyone of these miracles is a showstopper in its own right.


    Of course this has been said many times before, but it is still true.


    But please stay happy while you can. Meanwhile I will stay skeptic while I can.

  • - Overcoming the Coulomb barrier thus producing nuclear reactions.
    - Those reactions occur without prompt ionizing radiation.
    - No long-lived reaction products are produced.


    Is that plagiarism? How do these three miracles differ from Huizenga's three miracles?


    If you are still working from these, you have missed a lot of science and criticism in the interim ~25 years. The one miracle that, at least to some physicists, remains most troubling is the "prompt ionizing radiation" question. Personally, it does not seem that the branching ratios for near MeV-driven collisional fusion are necessarily constrained to product ratios brought about by low energy processes where at least one player is in the condensed or even solid phase.

  • So it appears [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is more than just another licensee, as Rossi mentions both he and them having received the report. And also that he: "hope's that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and I will be able to release the report in the near future". Good to see the two partnered still, but also that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] has a larger role than speculated on lately. Still married too, although probably not blissfully...but hey, who cares as long as they are married?


    A very good sign indeed the way Rossi worded the announcement! Things are looking up. How, by whom, the report is released, how much is revealed, what it reveals, will be telling also. Should be an interesting next couple of weeks. Could be some disappointments also, as there almost always is with this story.

  • Shane D.


    It is important Rossi announced the report was released not [lexicon]IH[/lexicon], and then two hours later said he will make it public in ten days. Does it mean Rossi wanted to force [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] hand to get report out? Now there seems to be agreement something will be released in 5-10 days? Like you said they seem to be stuck with each other, not sure it is a happy marriage.

  • An email from Rossi indicates that the report will be released in 5–10 days.


    Worse case scenario; at least we can all take comfort Krivits, as a serious journalist, is no more!


    March 10, 2016 – By Steven B. Krivit –
    [lexicon]Industrial Heat[/lexicon] has apparently terminated its relationship with businessman Andrea Rossi.


    March 29, 2016 – By Steven B. Krivit –
    A quiet chill has come over the relationship between [lexicon]Industrial Heat[/lexicon], LLC, a North Carolina company, andAndrea Rossi,

  • A report on the Wright brother's first flight would be both positive and negative. The positive would be seen by those who can imagine the possibilities of expanding on the concept of flight and the negative would be spoken by those who would point out that such an airplane cannot replace other forms of transportation. I suspect that the reaction to this report will be similar. I suspect that it will not be creating headlines in the mainstream media that announce that the age of fossil fuels is coming to an end. What is needed is the installation of hundreds of units that are safe, stable and less expensive than the alternatives.


    d

  • It is important Rossi announced the report was released not [lexicon]IH[/lexicon], and then two hours later said he will make it public in ten days. Does it mean Rossi wanted to force [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] hand to get report out? Now there seems to be agreement something will be released in 5-10 days? Like you said they seem to be stuck with each other, not sure it is a happy marriage.



    BBCK,


    I have no doubt that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and Rossi are at odds. Very obvious by the broadsides directed at each other the past few months. But even divorced couples join hands to celebrate a grandchild. This is the first time Rossi seems to be giving [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] their due in quite a long time. We shall see if [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] reciprocates.


    Fun times ahead!

  • So it appears [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is more than just another licensee, as Rossi mentions both he and them having received the report.


    My guess: [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] are both a licensee and Rossi's primary financial backer at the moment. The licensee arrangement may be what felt most acceptable to one or both of them, in order to maintain a professional distance and some independence.

  • Quote from Shane D.: “So it appears <a href="https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/wiki/index.php/Entry/7-IH/">[lexicon]IH[/lexicon]</a> is more than just another licensee, as Rossi mentions both he and them having received the report.”
    My guess: <a href="https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/wiki/index.php/Entry/7-IH/">[lexicon]IH[/lexicon]</a> are both a licensee and Rossi's primary financial backer at the moment. The licensee arrangement may…



    This makes some sense. Moreover I've wondered for a while whether Cherokee/[lexicon]IH[/lexicon] had a share in the trust that owns Leonardo.

  • Нефть никогда не придет к концу, планета будет потеряна, масло кровь планеты!

    Нефть - это кровь планеты, надо сделать модель планеты и мы получим генератор Тарасенко, эта энергия покорит вселенную! :lenr:

  • dartin, and anyone else concerned, you may find my post in the segment: "How do you launch a potential world-changing energy technology?" of interest, given the last sentence in your comment above.


    Millions of engines that can run without fuel reflect another breakthrough in thus far unaccepted new science and technology. They can readily be produced by existing engine manufacturers worldwide.

  • Rex
    March 29, 2016 at 10:58 PM


    Andrea Rossi
    March 29, 2016 at 11:40 PM


    No Professors? I am disappointed.


    Does this single Nuclear Engineer have any experience in electric water heaters?

  • @H-G Branzell: It is more important to which company/organization this guy is employed.


    Is it a well known and state trusted certification organization (like german "TÜV", don't know what's equivalent in the US), or is it a small unknown company? The latter would be a hard punch in our faces...


    I just hope that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon], with their business experience and professionalism, made a wise choice and took an organization which is serious and without any doubts (for their own safety as well).

  • Shane wrote:

    So it appears [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is more than just another licensee, as Rossi mentions both he and them having received the report. And also that he: "hope's that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and I will be able to release the report in the near future". Good to see the two partnered still, but also that [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] has a larger role than speculated on lately.


    Shane, I think you are reading too much into this:
    (1) The "1 year test" was clearly set up when [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] was seeing Rossi as the saviour of mankind, and with some idea of testing his credentials. Quite how much of an idea we will perhaps discover if/when we see the report. So of course they get a copy.
    (2) [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and Rossi recent comments have been exactly in line with Rossi going his own way.


    We will find out: if [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] trumpet the report (eventually) as proof positive of commercial LENR and state their plans for the commercial rollout we will know that the relationship is intact.

  • I think it would be wise to examine the contents of the report before any conclusions can be drawn in any direction. Everything else besides confirming of the successful operation of a 1MW LENR plant within an industrial environment with a COP greater than (lets say) 2 would be first a big disappointment and would secondly not stop but extremely harm the subject LENR. I hope Rossi, Vaughn and Darden of Leonardo, [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and Cherokee are aware of the immense importance of this report for the future of LENR and that is not a PR debacle again, as in Lugano test!

  • Dear Andrea Rossi and Colleagues,

    I am really happy about the positive results of such, extremely long, test.
    My CONGRATULATIONS to Andrea: he was the real winner of 27 years long battle.
    My opinion is that, if all will go "well", our world will change quite quickly.
    The direction of changing will depend on the "managing", in the very near future, such REVOLUTIONARY invention.


    Perhaps some of You know my opinion about managing disruptive technologies that can change the world and mankind. Such was the reason because I joined the Live Open Science (LOS) approach since the beginning (2012), as started from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project group.
    BTW the LOS approach, because the very innovative phylosophy/procedures, was candidate 2 times (2014 and 2015) for the Nobel Prize for Peace, as "supported" both from very high level Professor at Vatican and a Senator of Italian Higher House.


    I hope that Andrea, after proper "private" advantages (i.e. extremly large amounts of money and Honors, to him and to the Company that gave the money) because such invention, will allow to share some of his results to other Scientist to avoid a new "oligarchy" of Energy, like the (very infamous) "Seven Sisters" situation in the 1900 (and up to now).
    I well know that it is no easy but now Andrea Rossi has to demonstrate to be even more brave of previous situations. He will be the ideal Candidate for Nobel Prize for Peace!
    According to the rules, the Selecting Board of Peace Nobel Prize (5 people in total, Norway citizen) has the right to suggest the candidature of a specific People/Organization even not officially presented by usual produres before February 1 of each year.


    Francesco CELANI
    (previous Vice-President of ISCMNS)