I don't understand your comment at all. I hope you won't think I'm insulting you when I point out that parts of it are contrary to the facts.
(1) I was replying to Sifferkoll who was upset and clearly did NOT understand my position - see his points 1-6 and my replies 1-6.
(2) Please note Sifferkoll's language to me and my language, and if you still think I am "verging on insult" in some manner that others here do not do more of please tell me where I do this.
(3) If you want me to stop posting here for a while because others do not like to consider the points I raise - which I can well understand - just say that without insulting me (it is an insult to tell me that I am insulting others when that is not my intention nor action, and also it is an insult to say I'm repeating myself for no reason when I was specifically answering Sifferkoll who - unusually perhaps - does not seem to realise my position and therefore is insulting me). We could view it as a temporary ban in order to keep the morale of believers up.
I do find these new revelations fascinating and don't think we have nearly got to the bottom even of what is already in the public domain - so I would naturally continue to post.
Best wishes, Tom