I definitely have read your post. I was using activated charcoal.
Replication of Holmlid and Olaffsons experiment - required components
-
-
If the amateurs aren't able to replicate even the primitive vacuum discharge experiments with nickel and lithium, then the pulse experiments requiring mode locked laser are certainly over their facility. I'd recommend to start with replication of plasma electrolysis and to stop thinking about BS.. .
https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26018728
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…naoh-electrolysis-system/For powering of electrolysis the cheap welding inverter can be used, especially if we remove rectifying section, we get a nifty HF power source. Another option is the power source from dismantled induction cooker.
-
A question as a non-expert in neutron detection. Can a muon signal (as Holmlid is detecting) be in some cases mistaken for a neutron signal, especially when muons are not expected? I guess this would not be the case with a cloud chamber, but what about when a cloud chamber is not used?
My guess is that the slower muons could undergo capture in the detection material, giving rise to an elusive neutron-like signal. I could be wrong, however.
This is an excellent question. I have started a series of experiments in which a cloud chamber will sit next to a few neutron detectors. Hope this will give some hints.
Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.