One of the most important scientific concepts is: all is relative to the measure unit.
This is true in science, but it is especially true for our mind and for the patterns that it uses.
I think, when all is confused and difficult, it is necessary to order to reason correclty. If we are immersed in the details, we lose sight of the "big picture". He can't see the wood for the trees.
We must, therefore, get on a "mental airplane" for changes our perspective.
Now we are in the airport, we see people, houses, trees, cars. Everything looks great. Everything seems important.
And indeed it is. Relatively to that system of measurement.
the airplane takes off and climbs. The things that sooner filled our eyes and mind seem to disappear. The picture changes. Simultaneously, everything becomes smaller and everything gets bigger.
We see that the place where we started is just a small piece of a larger reality. We see mountains and seas (that were hidden before us), we understand that our mind was absorbed in a thousand details inessential. Details that hid us a greater reality.
This long preamble is only to invite you to take "mental airplane" before reading me, to invite you to use the correct measuring system.
We proceed, then, to reason by following conceptual blocks of the basic values (using the 0-1 method that is false-true) and let's review the% statistical chance.
E-cat is not work (0)
E-cat works (1)
In the case (0), everything is simple. Rossi will not produce any technology. No one will produce its technology. In a few days or months..... game over.
In the case (1), all is enormously complex. To produce this technology means totally change the world. It means clashing with forces that have enormous power. It means upsetting the balance of industries, large capitals, Countries.
In case A (0) who takes damage and who acts? In the end, in addition to disappointment for many who hoped for this idea, the damage does not exist. IH does not have to pay. Rossi can not dispute. No one acts.
In case A (1) who suffer damage and who acts? In this case the Entities that could suffer huge damage would be many and powerful and they they would have the means, the opportunities and the reasons to act. Clearly that secretly.
In case A (0) there would be entities or individuals interested in owning the technology? NO.
In case A (1) there would be entities or individuals interested in owning the technology? YES.
In case A (O): IH (Cherokee) which subsidizes and collaborates on the project for years and, (and if they are not crazy, they have always monitored and evaluated the thing for which they paid) , waiting to withdraw from the contract the last time? The objective's confirmation time ? After 1 year of testin which they were present? Either they are crazy or would have gone a LONG time ago.
In case A (1): Why IH (Cherokee) which subsidizes and collaborates on the project for years (and if they are not crazy, they have always monitored and evaluated the thing for which they paid), waiting to withdraw from the contract the last time? Because, if the test is valid, they understand that the technology (of which ONLY IN PART are owners) worth so much that they want to walk alone.
In case A (0) industrial forces, political, lobbies, act and intervene? NO
In case A (1) industrial forces, political, lobbies, act and intervene? YES
In case A (0) did so by IH (Cherokee) request/maintain/obtain patents? NO
In case A (1) does so by IH (Cherokee) request/maintain/obtain patents? YES
In case A (0): The superior technology developed by E-cat quark has value? Certainly not. If the "mom" is a scam, the "son" is a scam.
In case A (1): The superior technology developed by E-cat quark has value? YES, HUGE
Hot-cat is not E-cat quarks. The stakes are raised.
Worldwide scientists are making experiments on LENR. Not only we are close to a breakthrough, but this change is absolutely necessary the world.
Read this interesting article:
The change that will result from LENR will epochal. It will create a new world, but it will destroy an old world.
It will create a paradise. But for some it will be hell.
Rossi and/or other scientists will come soon to the final result (or are we have already arrived).
But Rossi "sings out from the choir". He upset the applecart. He's not in the political schemes / economic / industrial. He can not be managed / directed / controlled.
If the hypothesis A (1) is right, he has a head-start over the others. Not huge, but he did.
He has only one defense "flood the market". Others have only an attack: stop him.
How? I believe that often he had feared for his life. "Make it disappear him" would be an option (often used). But it is easier to discredit him and meanwhile "to use him."
We took our mental plane.
We left below the dust.
Now it's up to you to look at.