The thread "Cutting Through the Fog Surrounding the Rossi/IH Dispute (Josh G)" is now closed due to a lack of 'calm debate'. I hope this will enable the proper continuation of this debate with the exclusion of all 'ad homs' 'assumptions' and any opinion which would otherwise not be acceptable in a court of law.
As an example, I do not exclude Thomas's critique on Lugano or MFMP clarification of any Lugano testing and calorimetric discussion, or for that matter discussion on the ERV report when it becomes available, but I would hope that all conjecture or other opinion which aims to discredit contributors or other players be tempered, by a test (hypothetical though it may be) of it being accepted or rejected by a Judge in a court of law.