The Playground

Quote from zorud

No idea how you now talk on UK data…? Was the discussion topic not on your home country and the cited sources and data?

I was referring to the available Swiss data, and was asking, what other Swiss sources you have for „your data“, that are seem to completely different.

BAG data…from your mentioned source…. (Partly translated with Google)

In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of vaccination based on the risk of hospitalization, these figures must therefore be extrapolated to 100,000 vaccinated or 100,000 unvaccinated people and divided by age group. This is also necessary because the unvaccinated are on average significantly younger than the vaccinated. So they have a lower risk of having to go to hospital because of Covid-19 disease just because of their age. It turns out that in people over the age of 60, there were about ten times more hospital admissions among the unvaccinated than among the vaccinated.

But also across all other age groups, vaccinated people come to hospital much less often with Covid-19 infection than their unvaccinated fellow human beings.

Japanese parents weigh pros, cons of having their children vaccinated

Japanese parents weigh pros, cons of having their children vaccinated

COVID-19 vaccinations for children aged between 5 and 11 may begin February in Japan, but many parents and caregivers are still debating whether they should…

japantoday.com

TOKYO

COVID-19 vaccinations for children aged between 5 and 11 may begin February in Japan, but many parents and caregivers are still debating whether they should inoculate young ones due to worries over effects on their health.

Unlike some other countries, there have been no COVID-19 deaths reported among children in the particular age group in Japan, and it is rare for young children to develop severe symptoms caused by the novel coronavirus.

In the meantime, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, where vaccinations for the age group have already begun, recommends those children get vaccinated because COVID-19 can make them very sick, cause them to be hospitalized, and in some cases, the complications from infection can lead to death.

Since some parents in Japan are wary of possible side effects and fear potential long-term health effects of the vaccines, meticulous and committed support by authorities and health experts is seen as key to promoting the inoculation of pediatric populations.

Some side effects of the vaccines include tiredness, fever and nausea, according to the CDC.

Health authorities around the world, including the health ministry of Japan, deny long-term health effects such as fertility and other reproductive issues, as messenger RNA introduced by Pfizer Inc's vaccine, expected to be the first one to be approved for use for young children in the country, are quickly degraded in a matter of a few days.

The vaccine cannot change people's DNA either as mRNA do their work outside of the nucleus of their cells where DNA is stored, according to the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry.

A woman in her 30s in Tokyo says she has been hesitant to get her daughter, a kindergartner, vaccinated out of concern over side effects because the woman experienced chest pain after she received her first vaccine shot.

But she recently felt a change in public sentiment with respect to vaccinating kids after the emergence of the Omicron variant, considered highly transmissible.

"If the infections spread, peer pressure to vaccinate kids would increase. I'm afraid I might be criticized if I hesitate," she said.

According to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, a total of 87,800 preschoolers, compulsory school and high school students were infected with the coronavirus from June 2020 to late November 2021, with almost no serious cases.

Opinions of the health ministry's panel on vaccinating children aged 5 through 11 remain divided, with some insisting rights to be vaccinated should be ensured, while others remain hesitant to aggressively push forward with the vaccination of young children.

In a survey taken by the National Center for Child Health and Development, 55 percent of responding elementary school students said they wanted to receive shots, while 38 percent said they did not.

"I would like to respect my child's own choice after I give him information including risks, but I also wonder how much he can understand it," said a man in his 30s in Kyoto.

His son will enter an elementary school next spring.

Schoolteachers began to wonder how they should respond when students ask them about vaccinations, even though no mass vaccinations will take place at schools after the government approves the inoculation of children aged between 5 and 11.

"I hope the government will disclose enough information so all students and their families can comprehend the situation and make a satisfactory choice," said Harumi Okada, the principal of a city-run elementary school in Osaka.

Critics and experts say it is also important to prevent children and parents from experiencing stigma over getting or not getting vaccinated.

Quote from zorud

BAG data…from your mentioned source…. (Partly translated with Google)

Please link the source data! This is not in the official report I linked.

The only official report is: https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/b…19_Woechentliche_Lage.pdf

Quote from Fm1

In the meantime, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, where vaccinations for the age group have already begun, recommends those children get vaccinated because COVID-19 can make them very sick, cause them to be hospitalized, and in some cases, the complications from infection can lead to death.

This simply is criminal. CDC caused dozen of dying children from RSV by locking them out from school and masking.

CDC = center of health destruction and control.

Even UK said almost all kinds that did with CoV-19 had chemo or or sever illness. Only a sick clown did here link a sick kid as a healthy example... Same fro Switzerland no death age < 30 from CoV-19. One case chemo with!

Quote from Wyttenbach

Please link the source data! This is not in the official report I linked.

The only official report is: https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/b…19_Woechentliche_Lage.pdf

The Neue Züricher Zeitung refers to data based on BAG… are there two different BGA? See source below the graphs…

Here for you with updated numbers from today…

Coronavirus in der Schweiz: die wichtigsten Grafiken

Welche Kantone sind wie stark vom Virus betroffen? Was unternimmt der Bund im Kampf gegen Sars-CoV-2? Die wichtigsten Daten und Fakten zum Coronavirus in der…

www.nzz.ch

NZZ probably uses the more detailed BAG data from the BAG dashboard…?

COVID-⁠19 Switzerland | Coronavirus | Dashboard

COVID-⁠19 pandemic in Switzerland and Liechtenstein: case numbers, virus variants, hospitalisations, Re number, hospital capacity, international situations,…

www.covid19.admin.ch

Quote from zorud

BAG data…from your mentioned source…. (Partly translated with Google)

Note that ~83% of the Swiss population is vaccinated. So, unfortunately, there are still many people who are likely to become seriously ill. Cases are increasing rapidly.

Switzerland: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps

Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily

graphics.reuters.com

Unvaccinated people are dancing with death.

Good outlook from John Campbell

overall.. a few deaths... but we will be back to

the normal crazy

rather than the crazy crazy world

in February/ March

The wife got tested negative 3 times because she visited 3 nursing homes yesterday..

Got back at 3.am this morning back to work at 9 am

3 Covid cases... delta? omicron? I expect her to "be with omicron"

and me too within 2 weeks

as will be most of the NSW population

Almost half of reported NY COVID-19 hospitalizations are not due to COVID-19

Almost half of reported NY COVID-19 hospitalizations are not due to COVID-19

Data shows 43% of hospital admissions were not due to COVID

www.foxnews.com

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul released data Friday breaking down COVID-19 hospitalizations by those who were admitted due to the virus and those who were admitted for other reasons but were found to have the illness.

Included in the data was a chart showing "how many hospitalized individuals who have tested positive for COVID-19 were admitted for COVID-19/COVID-19 complications and how many were admitted for non-COVID-19 conditions."

According to the provided statistics, in approximately 43% of hospital admissions "COVID was not included as one of the reasons for admission."

Such cases totaled 4,928 as of Jan. 7, compared to 6,620 patients "admitted due to COVID or complications of COVID."

According to the same data set, a staggering 51% of COVID-19 hospitalizations in New York City were not due to COVID-19 or related symptoms. The numbers show that 3,060 patients were hospitalized for reasons other than COVID-19, while only 2,992 were admitted due to the illness.

"My administration is hard at work making testing, vaccines, boosters and masks more widely available in to fight this winter surge," Hochul said.

"While we are prepared to deal with whatever comes our way using the tools we know are effective, it will take a concerted effort on the part of every New Yorker to beat this pandemic and protect our loved ones."

Hochul's administration recently faced backlash after revealing that it will prioritize non-White people in the distribution of COVID-19 treatments in short supply.

New York’s Department of Health released a document detailing its plan to distribute the treatments, such as monoclonal antibody treatment and antiviral pills.

The plan includes a section on eligibility for the scarce antiviral pills that people must meet to receive the treatment, including a line stating a person needs to have "a medical condition or other factors that increase their risk for severe illness

No one has ever seen even one real customer of the magician’s SKam stuff but now he’s blathering of a sort of the well known chain letter.

Quote

• Andrea Rossi January 7, 2022 at 7:21 PM

  Giuseppe:

  Our Customers are mostly big buyers that will resell the Ecats.

  Warm Regards,

  A.R.

Physicists Crack Unsolvable Three-Body Problem Using Drunkard's Walk https://www.livescience.com/three-body-problem-solution

By Ashley Hamer 4Jan22

It has plagued scientists since the days of Isaac Newton...

Seems why lasco is out of trim with calculation observed with all the activity

few objects are in the correct locations from the sun as corroborated.. for now.

Quote from JedRothwell

there are still many people who are likely to become seriously ill.

an inference or prediction ? omicron is likely to cause many people to become seriously ill?

It's not over with the new COVID variants re-appearing (eg in Marsielle) every day. Omicron it seems gives us a brief relief. I wonder what Professor Didier Raoult, the eminent virologist, thinks about it now?

Like most expert virologists he is probably being told to keep his mouth shut by the right=wing French Government!

Quote from zorud

NZZ probably uses the more detailed BAG data from the BAG dashboard…?

The dashboard is highly unreliable for hospital cases & vaccinations. You can easily see this when you look at e.g. cases/vaccine type where they miss about 70% of all data.....

Here a data point that now "seems" to be more or less complete. What you see is that vaccinated contribute about 35..40% of hospital cases. "unbekannt" does not mean not vaccinated it means vaccine type not known. But most hospitals do no allow full reporting due to top down orders. 2 nurses I know privately told be this on their own because they were concerned.

Also note that data lags behind > 1 month and is largely incomplete as cases after 1. December did strongly raise and also hospital patients did go up 50% : https://www.covid19.admin.ch/de/hosp-capacity/icu

NZZ is the oldest free mason newspaper may be in continental Europe. So do not expect them to do proper reporting.

So good posting is always about knowning the source data and who & how its tweaked,

India: The Omicron wave is now unfolding in all states :: https://www.mygov.in/covid-19

We know from several events (plane passengers!) that the time from infection to be positive is just a few hours with Omicron. Further omicron is not shielded by S-antibodies acquired from alpha,gamma, delta.

But we know that in India already in June 2021 70% of all people counted as recovered and thus have a good general immunity. Exception the two vaccine terror states Kerala & Mizoram.

This has been similar in UK and did allow to calculate the daily peak infection rate. So you can roughly use UK data to make a projection for India. The difference is that many people in India live in remote areas and thus the raise as we see it already will be much slower and thus the peak will be flatter.

Deaths are not yet raising as these (the peak!) usually trail 10..14 days. But highly vulnerable people did die within 3-4 days (Alpha,Delta) but this is not seen so far because Omciron causes no serious lung damage.

The Global Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin in COVID-19 (Part I)

The Global Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin in COVID-19 (Part I)

The tactics deployed by the pharmaceutical industry in their decades-long war on generic drugs reached a zenith during COVID-19... and have resulted in

trialsitenews.com

The tactics deployed by the pharmaceutical industry in their decades-long war on generic drugs reached a zenith during COVID-19… and have resulted in true crimes against humanity.

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

by Pierre Kory

Ivermectin, a decades-old, off-patent drug costing pennies to make, with an unparalleled safety profile and numerous manufacturers across the world, actually sits atop one of the largest and strongest clinical trials evidence base in history. The existing, massive amount of clinical trials data shows immense efficacy against COVID-19 in all its phases; prevention, early and late treatment, and long-haul syndrome (no actual trials in long-haul but rather extensive positive clinical experiences). Despite this inarguable (yes, inarguable) supportive evidence, no major Western or international health agency has recommended its use in COVID-19. Conversely, ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 23 “less developed” countries (39 if you include non-government medical organizations), and which include about 25% of the world’s population.

Now, before we delve deeper into the workings of the most heinous disinformation campaign ever waged by the pharmaceutical industry in history (and also it’s most successful so far as 75% of the earth’s inhabitants still have not been recommended to use it to treat COVID), I will ask you not to just “take my word for it” but instead take you on a brief, guided tour of the insanely positive evidence base supporting the use of ivermectin in COVID-19.

Let’s go. First, the below “Forest Plot” was compiled by the anonymous expert research group at c19early.com (not enough can be said of the impact their meticulous work has had on COVID clinicians and scientists across the globe). Please visit their site, it is mind-blowingly impressive. The compounds listed in the rows represent the medicines with the most clinical trials evidence as of today, either by size or by number and are listed in order of potency against COVID.

Here is how to read and understand a Forest Plot: there is a thin grey line in the center, on either side of which are plotted squares which represent an estimate of the true size of the “treatment effect,” derived from an average of the treatment effects measured from all the trials performed of that medicine. If the box is squarely on the vertical line it means it is a treatment whose benefits have been found equal to its harms. In the above list, (with the exception of one) medicines with “positive” treatment effects are listed, meaning the benefits of treatment with these agents outweigh any potential or actual harms. No medicine on the list above, besides convalescent plasma (CP), indicates it is inferior to placebo (note that CP was the initial favored therapy of every single academic medical center in the U.S despite the fact CP has only ever been shown to be effective in hematogenous infections). In cases, such as with CP, due to the fact it’s harms outweigh it’s benefits, the box is plotted on the right side of the line and shaded in red. Conversely, the farther to the left of the vertical line that a box is plotted, the larger the measured impact on the clinical outcome tested. Green boxes indicate the effect estimate is based on at least 4 trials. Grey boxes and greyed out medicine names mean the estimate for that medicine is based on fewer than 4 trials. The thin horizontal line through each little box indicates the degree of precision, i.e. how confident we can be in the estimate of the treatment effect – narrow horizontal lines through the boxes mean the data in support is large and consistently positive and is “statistically significant” in favor of the medicine. The wider the line, the less consistent, or less amount of data can be relied upon to make the estimate. When the horizontal line through a box extends across the vertical gray line, this indicates that it is statistically possible that the true estimate may actually be in favor of placebo!

With ivermectin, what sets it apart from all the other compounds tested, is the sheer number of randomized and observational controlled trials that have been performed to date. It is #1 among the “green box” compounds given it has been tested in 73 controlled trials which include an unheard-of 56,804 patients. Why unheard of? Because never in history has a medicine been so thoroughly tested, with such consistent positive results, yet led to a situation where governmental agencies in highly developed countries call for even more placebo-controlled trials to be done.. and then slow walk to doing them. The ethics of giving a covid patient a placebo given this amount of supportive data are too miserable to contemplate this early in the article (fun fact – I was personally asked to try to help recruit patients for the ongoing University of Minnesota placebo controlled RCT. I got off the phone as fast as I could). Another not-so-fun fact: penicillin was mass deployed to great effect to all our troops for their battlefield injuries in World War II.. based on a case series of 157 patients where their bacterial infections overtly resolved without signs of toxicity during treatment. Not one RCT was done before this decision was made by military and medical leaders.

The only other medicine with a larger supportive evidence base is hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), especially when only the early treatment trials of HCQ are considered as that collection of trials results in an equally impressive position on the Forest plot (not shown). A tired topic I will explore later is the much parroted (and highly favored by Pharma) notion that “retrospective, observational controlled trials (OCT)” cannot be trusted as they are inferior to “proper, large, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trials (RCT).” This notion is not evidence based. Even the captured (I know, sorry) Cochrane Library knows this. They themselves have shown that, on average, over thousands of clinical trials, over decades of research, OCT’s and RCT’s reach the same conclusions. So stop with the false dichotomy. Pharma wants you to only trust in “large RCT’s”.. because they are the only ones with the cash to do them. That way, they can control the only medicines that get “proven” and thus adopted into guidelines.

Two absurdities (crimes) must be highlighted in the above diagram – one is the sheer number of medicines with demonstrated efficacy, most costing under $5 a dose (and almost all with unparalleled safety profiles and/or “over the counter” status) that are still not recommended by any U.S or “western” health agency (with the exception of the state of Florida since the hire of Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo who has put together a terrific public health campaign supporting the use of a combination early treatment protocol which includes another FLCCC adopted drug, fluvoxamine).

Meanwhile our federal governmental health agencies, which I have argued repeatedly (and will for years until it stops) are so completely captured by the pharmaceutical industry that they have not advocated for any one of these “repurposed” compounds, even as a “precautionary principle” (meaning that even if the purported benefits may not be realized to the extent estimated, the risks are so small it is more likely best for all we employ them now in early treatment given the world is cratering). Their most unforgivable and absurd inaction is the deliberate ignoring of the critical role of Vitamin D in protecting against the worst outcomes of COVID, despite knowing full well significant portions of the U.S population is Vitamin D deficient. Even Anthony Fauci recommends to himself that he take Vitamin D… regularly. The data below was given to me by a Dr. Henele and is from work he published in 2016. Note the percent of the U.S population that is critically deficient in Vitamin D.

The second absurdity is found when looking at the plot with only the medicines recommended in the NIH’s COVID protocol circled. Note that the NIH protocol is adhered to by almost the entirety of the country’s hospitals (largely due to large add-on bonuses paid to hospitals when the protocol elements are used – I am not making this up). A “theme” should begin to emerge as you look at the circled, “recommended” medicines vs the non-circled, “non-recommended” medicines – every single one is massively expensive. Every single one. Note not one inexpensive drug is circled. How much more evidence do you need to prove that our agencies have been completely captured by the pharmaceutical industry?

Fun fact now that you are en expert in reading Forest Plot’s: Merck’s mutagenic new drug molnupiravir, after the highly positive results from their study’s “interim analysis,” published in a press release, instead found that, in the 2nd half of its one study, the data favored… placebo. Thus if the 2nd half was a stand-alone study (which it arguably could have been) it’s box would be firmly on the right side of the line. FDA still approved… while feigning concern. Unsurprising really.

Now, beyond the above 73 controlled trials supporting ivermectin, there are, in addition, numerous health ministries from around the world that deployed ivermectin in either the prevention or early treatment of COVID, among often very large populations. Each program’s report found that ivermectin use led to massive reductions in the need for hospitalization and/or death (Mexico City, Uttar Pradesh, Brazil, Misiones, La Pampas, Peru, Phillipines, and Japan – I will do a deeper dive on these in a later post). The program in the city of Itajai, Brazil is both the largest study of ivermectin in the world (data from nearly 200,000 patients was carefully collected over a 6 month period) and most impressive. They found that, despite the fact that the 120,000 patients who agreed to take ivermectin every 15 days were older, fatter, and sicker than the approximately 37,000 that did not…they went to hospital 67% less frequently, and died 70% less frequently.. from all causes, not just COVID. The issue with ivermectin as a therapeutic in COVID.. has NOTHING to do with the science.

The issue with ivermectin is simply it’s price – it costs less than a $1 and represents the biggest threat to the immense and future profits of the pharmaceutical industry’s novel oral anti-viral drugs… as well as their vaccines.

The previous title holder of the largest threat to Pharma profits in COVID was the highly effective (and also anti-viral) drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). However, it lost that title after the 2020 war on HCQ was essentially won by Pharma (for now?), using tactics so sinister as to be unimaginable, and which I will not review here as that macabre war has already been expertly reviewed in incredible and highly referenced detail in the book “The Real Anthony Fauci” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. His book, in my opinion, is a must read for all the globe’s citizens, as without it, no coherent understanding of the innumerable non-scientific actions and policies across the entirety of the developed (and majority of the undeveloped) world can be gained.

I must emphasize that ivermectin is just the latest drug under attack during Pharma’s long-standing (and highly successful) war on off-patent, “no-longer-obscenely-profitable” medicines. Books have been written about the numerous, and often criminal actions that Big Pharma has employed to replace older off-patent medicines with newer, highly profitable, and often poorly tested drugs with either prospectively known dangers or quickly discovered dangers which they then criminally suppress or distort to preserve profits. When science supporting older, off-patent, often “repurposed” medicines (particularly in the lucrative environment of a global pandemic) becomes “inconvenient” to the financial promise of newer agents, the industry employs what are called “Disinformation” tactics, first invented and perfected by the Tobacco Industry, and now used to great effect by the Pharmaceutical (and many other) industries. These tactics are brilliantly and succinctly summarized in an article called The Disinformation Playbook written by The Union for Concerned Scientists. I encourage all to read. The 5 main “plays” from the playbook are listed below. If you are at all versed in the ivermectin in COVID saga (many FLCCC followers are), it should be easy to quickly come up with numerous examples of each nefarious tactic. I give some hints below..

1) The “Fake”: Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research (Dr. Andrew Hill)

2) The “Blitz”: Harass scientists who speak out with results or views inconvenient for industry (attacks on FLCCC founders)

3) The “Diversion”: Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists (Dr. Andrew Hill/captured high-impact journals)

4) The “Screen”: Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies (i.e. high impact medical journal influences)

5) The “Fix”: Manipulate government officials or processes to inappropriately influence policy (i.e. capture the health agencies by creating “revolving doors” between Pharma and government to ensure total synchrony in objectives amongst their leaders)

Given the Disinformation Playbook was last updated in 2018, it does not include newer, more nefarious tactics that industries have been able to deploy since the historic consolidation of financial power by just 3 multi-trillion dollar investment funds (Black Rock, State Street, and Vanguard). These three corporations have now acquired influential or outright controlling investment stakes in nearly every major corporation in nearly every industry. These investment managers power, particularly the power held synchronously over media companies, social media companies, and the near entirety of the pharmaceutical industry, has allowed even more fearsome tactics to be used in the near-global suppression of the efficacy of ivermectin (and HCQ) as they now:

1) CENSOR any mentions of supportive evidence in corporate, (a.k.a. “legacy”) media. Note that, besides the influence of these investment manager overlords, the global censoring ability of media was greatly helped by the “Trusted News Initiative (TNI),” an obscene (and either naively misguided or completely corrupt) effort by the most powerful journalism organizations in the world to band together to try to control the spread of “mis-information”. Yes, professional journalists decided they needed to control information in a pandemic. I am not making this up. Would an appropriate analogy be that a bunch of physician leaders decided they needed to spread disease in a pandemic?

2) CENSOR any mentions or discussions of efficacy on almost all social media – see explicit youtube “community” policy below as the most unsubtle example:

YOUTUBE COMMUNITY GUIDELINES

3) RETRACT positive papers from impactful medical journals (3 fully peer-reviewed and highly supportive scientific reviews of ivermectin have been retracted, either immediately prior to or post-publication (I was the lead author on the first one with my FLCCC colleagues)

4) BLOCK review and publication of positive trials of ivermectin in major medical journals (in my now global network of ivermectin-expert and/or ivermectin study investigator colleagues, all lament how their positive clinical trials or papers were rejected for review from all the high-impact (captured) journals, with Dr. Eli Schwartz’s highly sophisticated, expertly conducted, and immensely positive study from Israel being one of the most illustrative examples

5)PUBLISH numerous “hit pieces” within high profile print media outlets discrediting the science and/or the scientists who support the medicine. This is actually an example of the already described “Blitz” tactic, but in 2021, during COVID, using total media control, it was deployed by a division of Howitzers. A more recent and relatable example of “the Diversion” tactic was when the NFL used media hit pieces to go after the scientists (and their inconvenient science) after they began publishing and disseminating data about the high rates and disastrous impacts of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in retired NFL players.

What I have found fascinating, is that for every planted hit piece article discrediting the mountain of evidence supporting ivermectin as a therapeutic, the FLCCC is actually rarely mentioned. But why? I think it is because the FLCCC is a sizeable group of highly published physicians and researchers (Professor Paul Marik is actually the most published practicing ICU physician in the history of the specialty). Thus, it’s hard (but not impossible) to call us “fringe.” The last thing they want to do is call attention to our high degree of credibility. Instead they seem to be trying to destroy it using separate hit pieces (among other tactics) which has led to the recent loss of employment for three founding FLCCC members (Drs. Marik, Meduri, and yours truly have been forced to leave jobs or had their exemplary clinical and research careers ended (Drs. Marik and Meduri). An article on ivermectin that does not mention our organization does so purposefully so as not to give attention to credible support for its use given we are considered the foremost clinical experts on the clinical use of ivermectin in COVID in the world.

6) employ a coordinated media-government agency PROPAGANDA campaign;

August 26th, 2021: Pharma used their CDC to send out a “health advisory” to all 50 state Departments of Health, which they then sent to all the physicians licensed in their respective states (a terrifying example of the immense destructive power of a federal agency captured by pharmaceutical industry interests). The bulletin both;

1) depicted ivermectin as a dangerous drug by deliberately exaggerating reports of calls to poison control centers

2) cited the meaningless fact that it “is not FDA approved for COVID” as a reason it should not be used, hoping doctors may not realize that “off-label” prescribing is both legal and encouraged.. by the FDA.

Next,a quickly debunked (not quickly enough) planted media article in Rolling Stone appeared with an impressively click-bait-able headline describing emergency rooms so overflowing with ivermectin overdoses that our nation’s gunshot victims couldn’t get (obviously) needed care (even I clicked on it). The article then went viral across the world (thousands of media mentions) before the hospital could put out a statement saying it was 100% false. Gee, do you think Pharma hired a professional PR firm to pull that one off or did they just benefit from a serendipitous and lamentably lazy journalist’s error?

Then, in another terrifying example of the control of major corporate media.. for week after week every news broadcaster, pundit, and late-night talk show host prefaced the word ivermectin with the descriptor “horse de-wormer.” Over and over and over again (totally pissing off Joe Rogan who recovered from COVID with ivermectin as part of his combination protocol- hah!)

Then finally, in a coup de grace, in comes Pharma’s FDA proudly using twitter to associate ivermectin with, you guessed it, horses. Janet Woodcock, the acting Commissioner of the FDA, even sent out a congratulatory email to her team about the success of the tweet.

Was this a coordinated attack led by an expert team of brazen PR professionals who have a fondness for horses… or did it arise organically via a series of disconnected events?

If you are still not convinced of the former, I need to point out that this “series of disconnected events” had an uncanny sense of when to “roll-out.” The CDC’s Health Advisory was issued on August 26th. Look at the below chart and see if you can find any reason why it would start then? Recall that the advisory was ostensibly in reaction to false “reports of calls to poison control centers”. The below chart shows instead what was really going on at the time – hundreds, if not thousands of licensed medical professionals across the country were prescribing ivermectin like mad during the terrible, and deadly summer surge of the Delta variant. Was someone getting nervous that a “dirty little secret” was being rapidly discovered by American citizens and physicians? The answer is a definitive yes – thus triggering Pharma to nefariously try to “stuff the genie back in the bottle” by unleashing their terrifying disinformation propaganda campaign.

NUMBER OF IVERMECTIN PRESCRIPTIONS DISPENSED IN THE U.S OVER TIME

But check this out.. the good ole’ FLCCC, my little band of brothers and sisters, is somehow making a opening in the wall of information suppression and distortion as shown in the chart below (compiled by our data analyst and ivermectin expert, Juan Chamie). I say this makes us “the Bad News Bears” in the repurposed drug war.

I am going to stop here.. and call it PART I. Please subscribe below so you can be sure to get Part II where I will continue to detail the numerous and wide-ranging corrupt actions taken to suppress the knowledge of efficacy and restrict the use of ivermectin… across the world. There is way way more to this story (warning – paywall ahead on some articles, like maybe the 2nd half of Part II so please sign up!)

Sorry, but the hours of writing are becoming too many – I don’t write fast, it takes me hours for each piece because I write, re-write, revise etc like an idiot- even though I know this stuff like the back of my hand because I have lived it every day for almost 2 years. Plus, I am no longer clinically employed since the hospitals don’t want me in their ICU’s anymore. Maybe I will make writing about the sad (but hopefully reparable?) state of medicine a new career until the old hospitals (or some new ones!) decide they want me back?

Check out Dr. Pierre Kory’s blog on Substack.

The Global Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin in COVID-19 (Part I)

The tactics deployed by the pharmaceutical industry in their decades-long war on generic drugs reached a zenith during COVID-19... and have resulted in true…

pierrekory.substack.com

Kings College Hospital Doc to UK Health Minister: Reconsider COVID-19 Vaccine Strategy—It’s Not Working

Recently, United Kingdom Health Secretary Sajid Javid met with health professionals at Kings College Hospital in London to discuss mandatory vaccination against COVID-19. The nation’s top health care official probably wasn’t prepared for the challenge he received from a physician at this prestigious academic medical center who declared that he has natural immunity and won’t be accepting the vaccine. Moreover, the doctor challenges the rational basis of the mass vaccination scheme given the unfolding conditions.

While COVID-19 cases hit record highs with Delta and now the Omicron surge –hitting a record 7-day new case average of 181,002, the mortality rate remains far lower than previous surges in the UK.

Sajid Javid met with staff at Kings College Hospital to discuss their strong recommendation to get vaccinated: Javid faced a challenge from a critically thinking physician that the health minister probably didn’t expect.

In the attached video, filmed by an insider and subsequently making its way to TrialSite, the physician, Steve James, a critical care doctor, shared with the minister his displeasure with compulsory vaccination. The physician shared quite confidently that he already had COVID-19 and consequently, has sufficient antibodies and thus was not vaccinated nor, he expressed, was he planning on getting the jab. Local British media picked up the transaction.

He continued educating Britain’s top health official, informing him that now with Delta, the vaccine effectiveness wanes considerably, and by eight weeks he would need a booster. Moreover, the doctor explained that with Omicron the vaccine may not even work.

The doctor then declared, “get dismissed from my job for this? It isn’t worth it.” He commented, “The science isn’t strong enough.” Javid didn’t bother to listen to the physician, striking back, “That’s your view, but there are other views.”

The King’s College Hospital physician replied there are others like him who don’t want to be vaccinated. He shared with Javid that first, natural immunity is comparable, and asked the minister, “What about waning immunity of the boosters? Given how fast the vaccine waned we would have to get a booster every month! There is protection for two months, but given the strength of the variants and the waning effectiveness of the vaccine the vaccination policy should be reconsidered.” Javid wasn’t happy with this critically thinking, independent-minded doctor, and quickly retorted, “We take the very best advice from people who are actually vaccine experts,” implying the critical care doctor’s opinion didn’t matter or wasn’t valid.

At Kings College Hospital the current policy states “While currently, it is not a mandatory requirement for staff to get their COVID-19 vaccination or disclose vaccination status to patients, we strongly support and encourage all our staff to get their jab, in line with national guidance—and nearly 90% of ours staff have already done so.”

Dr. David Boulware Discusses Early Treatment Trial for COVID-19

Dr. David Boulware Discusses Early Treatment Trial for COVID-19

Dr. Boulware is an infectious disease expert and researcher at the University of Minnesota. He is one of the lead investigators of the COVID-OUT clinical trial…

rumble.com

Almost half of reported NY COVID-19 hospitalizations are not due to COVID-19

Over half of COVID-19 hospitalizations in NYC were not due to COVID-19

Almost half of reported NY COVID-19 hospitalizations are not due to COVID-19

Data shows 43% of hospital admissions were not due to COVID

www.foxnews.com

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul released data Friday breaking down COVID-19 hospitalizations by those who were admitted due to the virus and those who were admitted for other reasons but were found to have the illness.

Included in the data was a chart showing "how many hospitalized individuals who have tested positive for COVID-19 were admitted for COVID-19/COVID-19 complications and how many were admitted for non-COVID-19 conditions

According to the provided statistics, in approximately 43% of hospital admissions "COVID was not included as one of the reasons for admission."

Such cases totaled 4,928 as of Jan. 7, compared to 6,620 patients "admitted due to COVID or complications of COVID."