The Playground - No more Covid Games Please.

  • Most Downloaded Articles - Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

    This article is top on the list. Ranked as the most downloaded article in the past nine months at the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry! December 2021

    Preliminary survey on cold fusion: It's not pathological science and may require revision of nuclear theory · Electrolysis of water on oxide surfaces · 2D MXenes: .

    Related article

    E-Cat World

    November 18, 2021 • 9 Comments

    Paper: “”Preliminary Survey On Cold Fusion: It’s Not Pathological Science And May Require Revision Of Nuclear Theory” (Journal Of Electroanalytical Chemistry)

    Paper: “”Preliminary Survey on Cold Fusion: It’s Not Pathological Science and May Require Revision of Nuclear Theory” (Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry) |

    November 18, 2021 • 9

  • Google Avigan and Paxlovid and you will find out that they have a common mode of action and are equally effective against flu, Sars-Covid2 and other retro-viruses like HIV. So the choice is simply a cheap generic drug or an expensive, untested analogue. Angela Merkel ordered a vast quantity of Avigan, based on pharmacological dose-response data for mass distribution in Germany.

  • Why is that that anti-vaxxers can never admit when that they are wrong?

    Dr Richard is unable to offer any evidence for his wild claim that Avigan is as effective as Paxlovid, so offers some nonsense about them having the “same method of action” - which is only true in only the very broadest sense, as they both inhibit a (different) protease.

    Wyttenbach, a buffoon who earlier claimed that Sutherlandia has a “50% success rate” at treating AIDS, now wants to pretend that a 20 year old article (which mentions that a clinical trial may take place in the future) is somehow relevant!

    He doesn’t link to an actual clinical trial -because they all show Sutherlandia is not effective at treating AIDS. For example:

    Consumption of Sutherlandia frutescens by HIV-Seropositive South African Adults: An Adaptive Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial
    Sutherlandia frutescens (L.) R. Br. is widely used as an over the counter complementary medicine and in traditional medications by HIV seropositive adults…

  • Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, Exosomes, and MicroRNAs

    Stephanie Seneff

    Opinion Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines are based on a revolutionary new technology that involves injecting into the arm muscle many molecules of the mRNA sequence that codes for the spike glycoprotein, a major protein in the envelope of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This protein is arguably the most toxic part of the virus. It is what allows the virus to bind to ACE2 receptors in cells, disabling them. The spike protein has a novel furin cleavage site that allows it to be snipped in half, releasing a segment called S1, which can then travel all around the vascular system and the lymph system. S1 carries the ACE2-binding site, and, when S1 by itself binds to an ACE2 receptor, the receptor becomes disabled. This has a profound impact, leading to excessive levels of angiotensin II and an acute inflammatory response, causing a wide range of symptoms and damage in both the heart and the brain. While the vaccines can only produce the spike protein and not the complete virus, this protein has profound toxic effects, systemically.

    Importantly, the mRNA that is in the vaccine is very different from the original viral mRNA sequence. Whereas the virus enters via the nose and lungs, the vaccine is injected past both the mucosal barrier and the vascular barrier. Researchers developing this technology were concerned about the RNA being attacked and broken down by the immune system before it had a chance to produce protein. A major breakthrough was when they discovered they could replace all of the uridines in the sequence with methylpseudouridine, a modification that makes the RNA very sturdy and difficult to break down. Also, a change in the genetic code introduced a pair of prolines causing the S1 subunit to stay stuck on the ACE2 receptors, disabling them. They also “humanized” the mRNA such that its viral origins are disguised, and they performed “codon optimization,” greatly altering the mRNA sequence from the original codons used by the virus, swapping in codons that are known to be more efficient at rapidly producing a steady stream of spike proteins.

    The muscle cells that take up the lipid particles encasing the mRNA immediately start synthesizing spike protein at a rapid and sustained pace. These cells display the newly synthesized spike proteins on their surface, and this draws in immune cells, especially dendritic cells, which also take up the vaccine lipid nanoparticles. Dendritic cells do not express ACE2 receptors, so they are resistant to viral infection, but not to the vaccine. They too start synthesizing spike protein, which is neurotoxic and which has prion-like features. They quickly enter the lymph system, carrying their toxic load into the lymph nodes and beyond, ultimately congregating in the spleen and liver.

    Germinal centers in the spleen become the playing field where the dendritic cells release the spike protein they are continually producing into the external milieu, packaged up within exosomes, small lipid particles that serve as a communication network for the organism. These activities draw B-cells and T-cells to the scene, and they get to work perfecting antibodies that exactly match portions of the spike protein. The primary goal of the vaccine is to get the immune system to produce abundant antibodies to the spike protein, and indeed they perform very well in this goal.

    The immune cells are compelled to release exosomes in order to rid themselves of the toxic spike protein rapidly accumulating in their cytoplasm. Unfortunately, the exosomes travel very well along nerve fibers. They travel from the germinal centers in the spleen up the splanchnic nerve to the celiac ganglia and beyond along the vagus nerve to eventually reach major organs of the body: the liver, the lungs, the heart, and the brain. At these destinations, the spike-containing exosomes are taken up by resident immune cells, which then activate an inflammatory cascade causing localized tissue damage.

    A seminal paper showed experimentally that vaccine transfected human cells take up the lipid nanoparticles and release exosomes containing not only spike protein but also certain specific microRNAs that have a profound negative effect on innate immunity. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA sequences that have powerful abilities to suppress expression of specific proteins. The two miRNAs that these researchers found in the exosomes suppress two proteins that play a critical role in executing the type I interferon response. Type I interferons activate an early alarm system that defends the organism against any kind of infection as well as cancer. Suppression of type I interferon can cause latent viruses like herpes and varicella to become activated and can cause cancer to come out of remission.

    Perhaps most alarming is the potential for the vaccine to cause neurodegenerative disease. There is a motif that is characteristic of prion proteins called the GxxxG motif (two glycine residues separated by three wildcards). The human prion protein has 14 GxxxGs, and amyloid-beta, the protein linked to Alzheimer’s disease, has 4. Most proteins have none. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein includes 7 GxxxGs. There is a fascinating structural motif in DNA and RNA called a “guanine quadruplex” (G4) which has been found to play multiple profound roles in regulating transcription and protein expression. Significantly, studies have shown that the prion protein binds to G4s in its own RNA, and this can trigger it to misfold into its toxic shape. What is very disturbing is that the RNA in the vaccine has been engineered via codon optimization to have many more guanines than the original virus version of the RNA. This means that there is a greater potential for the spike proteins to misfold after binding to G4s that are enriched in the vaccine mRNA.

    Our paper provides several tables showing the percentage of various reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines compared to all vaccines in 2021, according to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). First of all, we calculated that overall there were 27 times as many reports for COVID-19 vaccines as would have been expected if their adverse effect profile had been comparable to that of the flu vaccine. There were over 200,000 events in 2021 linking COVID vaccines to diverse symptoms that are commonly associated with inflammation in major nerves such as the vagus nerve, the cochlea, the facial nerve, and the trigeminal nerve. These accounted for more than 97% of all events linking any vaccine in 2021 with these symptoms. Over 8,000 reactions indicated heart damage linked to COVID-19 vaccines, including myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmias, and heart attack. These represented nearly 98% of all the reports for heart problems linked to any vaccine. There were over 10,000 cases of thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, accounting for nearly 99% of the total reports for these symptoms. The total counts for symptoms related to liver disease, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer were much lower, but COVID-19 vaccines accounted for over 97% of the liver-related symptoms, nearly 98% of the cases of memory impairment, 99.5% of cases of anosmia (loss of smell), and over 97% of reports of cancer of specific organs. It is widely acknowledged that VAERS events are vastly under-reported

  • He doesn’t link to an actual clinical trial -because they all show Sutherlandia is not effective at treating AIDS. For example:

    Thanks for the study that has been done on asymptomatic patients only. All old references are from stage III patients not from stage I/II.

    Today I certainly would take the modern drugs for an AIDS treatment. But also these cannot clear the virus.

    It is well known that an antiviral only can work if there is a pathology, that is very complex for AIDS that infects T-cells and normal cells. Sutherlandia only work on normal cells and stops the retro-virus from becoming permanent.

    But I understand that you have problems to take natural drugs that work fine under the correct protocol in the proper situation. The risk with natural drugs is always the same. Dosing varies with the growing place of the herb you take.

  • «Zu wackelige Grundlage, um Junge zur Impfung zu nötigen» (2) - infosperber
    Die Covid-Impfung könnte jungen Menschen unter dem Strich mehr schaden als nützen. Das leitet sich aus amtlichen Zahlen ab.

    (In German)

    This overview from CH/DE/NL data shows::

    The vaccination risk for age <50 is greater than the benefit.

    Only for age >60 there is some real benefit.

    Of course this is at now, not including long time damage from the fake vaccines.

  • Thanks for the study that has been done on asymptomatic patients only. All old references are from stage III patients not from stage I/II.

    These “old references” of yours are a fantasy. They don’t exist. Otherwise you wouldn’t be posting 20 year old BBC articles - that make zero claims of efficacy anyway.

    Please give the links if you disagree… Although at this point it seems Wyttenfact status is all but assured.

  • doesn't work but better than nothing?

    FDA approves remdesivir to treat young children with Covid-19

    But it does work : 87 percent effective in preventing severe disease progression!

    Unlike cheap Ivermectin which appears to get worse as the months go by, costly Remdesivir keeps getting better with time, like an expensive, fine wine. Maybe WHO will reconsider it's poo-pooing of Remdesivir back in 2020.

    From the article :

    The FDA's approval of remdesivir for young children is "great," said Dr. Daniel Griffin, an instructor in clinical medicine and associate research scientist in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics at Columbia University.

    Griffin called remdesivir a "very effective antiviral" at preventing the progression of Covid-19 to a more severe illness, lowering the risk of hospitalization or death, when given early in the course of Covid-19 infection.

    "More recently, the results have come out -- it was a really landmark paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine -- showing that if you give remdesivir in the first five days, during the acute viral phase, before you wait for the door to close, you could prevent progression by almost 90%. It was 87% in that study. So remdesivir actually can be a very effective antiviral if you give it at the right time in the right patient," Griffin said Monday.

  • I don't have a clue about the complex claims here - not being a molecular biologist.

    Oh... but...

    Neither is Seneff. And unlike Seneff I do not have a long record of loud public completely erroneous claims about medicine.

    Her claim to antivaxxer fame started with an idee fixee that glyphosphate was to blame for every ailment under the sun. When COVID came along she said it was to blame for COVID. She is pals with Wakefield (remember the MMR autism farud?).

    Glyphosate and COVID-19: Dr. Stephanie Seneff Strikes (Out) Again
    An MIT computer scientist with no expertise in agriculture, chemistry, toxicology, or the biological sciences. And yet for some reason, Stephanie Seneff has…

    What we have here is a series of laughable arguments that represent an illness sometimes seen among scientists who are wedded to a theory they have formulated and will try to fit square pegs into round holes to prove they were correct. In this case, in a sense, that illness is caused by glyphosate.

    She is a Computer Scientists from MIT who has in recent years published numerous articles about nutrition.

    She is also a died in the wool antivaxxer (all vaccines - not juts mRNA ones)

    External Content
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


  • Griffin called remdesivir a "very effective antiviral" at preventing the progression of Covid-19 to a more severe illness, lowering the risk of hospitalization or death, when given early in the course of Covid-19 infection.

    This is outrageous nonsense of a criminal doctor that likes to damage todlers kidneys!

  • It looks like some clowns run out of arguments. May be the latest news about the fake vaccines killing more people than saving was to much.

    I bet soon they will post some news about breast feeding...

    What we have here is a series of laughable arguments that represent an illness sometimes seen among scientists

    These “old references” of yours are a fantasy. They don’t exist.

  • Myocarditis for ever... Just to say it again. There is no mild form except the one generated by the vaccine terrorists that claim to see something that not exists...

    CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this large cohort study indicated that both first and
    second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and
    pericarditis. For individuals receiving 2 doses of the same vaccine, risk of myocarditis was
    highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose. These findings are
    compatible with between 4 and 7 excess events in 28 days per 100 000 vaccinees after
    BNT162b2, and between 9 and 28 excess events per 100 000 vaccinees after mRNA-1273.
    This risk should be balanced against the benefits of protecting against severe COVID-19

    So we have between 70 and 280 cases/ million "vaccines" among age < 24. But we have at most 1 CoV-19 death /million in this age group. So the damage benefit ratio is outrageous!

  • This is outrageous nonsense of a criminal doctor that likes to damage todlers kidneys!

    The good news is that children who are (somehow) deemed at high risk for progressing to serious Covid-19 illness would be very few and far between. The more options for doctors the better. Despite possible risk to the kidney, still much preferable to a mRNA vaccine imo.

    That said, I take with a big grain of salt studies funded and run by a pharmaceutical company to promote that company's own product. For instance in Gilead's Remdesivir study, self reported alleviation of symptoms by day 14 occurred 1.4 to 1.9 times more often in the Remdesivir arm than the placebo arm. Positive but fairly modest. Yet remarkably by that same day 14, ten times more people received medical attention for their symptoms in the placebo arm than the Remdesivir arm. (Twenty vs two people). That is the headline maker. One might ask : What exactly was the process by which a person sought out medical attention? Were some people perhaps counselled by a study supervisor to get seen by medical / hospital staff? Presumably not, but If so, was that supervisor blinded? Presumably he would have been, of course. But we don't know these things. They are not disclosed. All kinds of room for mischief.

  • Of course remdesivir acts as a potent anti-retroviral, but it has to be injected systemically for it to work - again like all the other anti-viral compounds we identified in Anti-Bat, has to be present and is only effective in the early stages of COVID infection before the damage has occurred. Avigan (favivipir) in early studies may be taken orally and was found to be equally effective to remdesivir (which is promoted by Gilead). Which is why, early on in 2021 Angela Merkel ordered a large million doses or so of Avigan for early treatment of COVID in Germany and why we included it in Anti-Bat rather than remdesivir. The more weapons including vaccines we have in fighting this pandemic the BETTER FOR ALL OF US!