The Playground

    Quote

    The most important and socially profitable cold fusion technology will be those that transmute dangerous nuclear waste to benign elements. gbgoble2012

    Radioactive cesium processing system and radioactive cesium processing method


    JP6636478B2 - Radioactive cesium processing system and radioactive cesium processing method - Google Patents

    2017-05-31

    Application filed by 三菱重工業株式会社

    2017-05-31

    Priority to JP2017108287A

    2017-09-21

    Publication of JP2017167161A

    2017-11-16

    Publication of JP2017167161A5

    2020-01-29

    Application granted

    2020-01-29

    Publication of JP6636478B2

    Status

    Active

    2033-10-11

    Anticipated expiration

    Just to clarify: a "patent" with an "A" behind the number is an application. Patent applications are worthless. Secondly, a granted patent is no proof of functionality. In fact, patent offices do not care at all whether something works or not. A patent has to meet three conditions: novelty, level of invention, marketability.

    Quote from Fm1

    Or perhaps not! Thousands if not millions say YOU are wrong. Ask the citizens of India who have no Covid.

    :)


    Well FM1, if we went by a global vote on what our beliefs should be we'd probably all be in favour of the CCP!


    I'm proud to say that millions saying I'm wrong does not affect me - especially because of those who know more than what their social media inbox tells them, most would say I'm right.




    Ruby


    January 18, 2022 at 1:07 AM

    @Steven Nicholes Karels:

    Again with these boring suggestions about what Rossi has to demonstrate and what he has not to ! He has correctly said that he has nothing more to demonstrate; further demos would only be a loss of time; the video demo he published on December 9th has generated, so far, orders for more than 600000 Ecat SKLep, a worth of US$ 150 millions. Now we must understand that he cannot lose time with further demos, what now he has to do is to focus on manufacturing and distribution of the Ecat SKLep.

    Best,

    Ruby






    Steven Nicholes Karels


    January 18, 2022 at 9:05 PM

    Ruby,

    I am sorry you found my suggestion boring.

    Judge blocks hospital from turning off ventilator of severely ill COVID-19 patient

    The order prohibited Mercy Hospital from turning off ventilation support.


    Judge blocks hospital from turning off ventilator of severely ill COVID-19 patient
    The order prohibited Mercy Hospital from turning off ventilation support to the patient.
    abcnews.go.com


    A Minnesota man with COVID who had been fighting for his life for months was transferred to a new hospital days after a judge blocked another hospital from taking him off a ventilator.


    The decision allowed Scott Quiner, 55, of Buffalo, Minnesota, to be moved to a hospital in Texas, where he is being treated.



    Quiner was initially admitted to Waconia Hospital, and then transferred to the ICU at Mercy Hospital, in Coon Rapids, on Nov. 6, after he tested positive for the virus in late October, according to a GoFundMe page in support of Quiner’s family, and the StarTribune, which was first to report this story.


    Anne Quiner, Scott's wife, was granted a temporary restraining order last Thursday against Mercy Hospital, after doctors informed her that day that they would be disconnecting her husband from the ventilator that had been supporting him since the late fall.


    The order, from an Anoka County judge, prohibited the hospital from turning off ventilation support, while Anne Quiner searched for a new facility to care for her husband.



    According to the court order, Anne Quiner told doctors that as her husband’s health care proxy, she “vehemently disagree[d]” with these actions and did not want her husband’s ventilator turned off.




    Over the weekend, Scott Quiner was moved to a facility in Texas for treatment, Marjorie J. Holsten, the Quiner family's attorney, told ABC News in a statement on Monday.



    “A doctor evaluated him and determined that he was severely undernourished. Scott has been receiving much-needed nourishment and hydration and medications that were not given by Mercy,” Holsten said. “He is being weaned off of the sedating drugs and has already been able to follow with his eyes movements the doctor made with his hands. He is making progress in the right direction, though he has a long road ahead of him and continued prayers are appreciated.”


    Quiner remains on a ventilator but the oxygen level has been lowered, the family's lawyer said.


    Representatives from Allina Health, which operates Mercy Hospital, told ABC News that they wish the patient and the family well, and have "great confidence" in their team's work.


    “Allina Health has great confidence in the exceptional care provided to our patients, which is administered according to evidence-based practices by our talented and compassionate medical teams. Due to patient privacy, we cannot comment on care provided to specific patients,” the health system wrote. “Allina Health continues to wish the patient and family well. Any information regarding the patient’s on-going care should be directed to his current medical provider.”

    Brazilian State of Rondônia Establishes Law: Use of ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Authorized Off Label Targeting COVID-19


    Brazilian State of Rondônia Establishes Law: Use of ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Authorized Off Label Targeting COVID-19
    The northwest Brazilian state of Rondônia, heavily dependent on agriculture and situated south of Amazonas and west of Mato Grasso, appears to be bucking
    trialsitenews.com


    The northwest Brazilian state of Rondônia, heavily dependent on agriculture and situated south of Amazonas and west of Mato Grasso, appears to be bucking the trend of many other states and accepting repurposed generic drugs for the early-onset treatment of SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. With about 1.6 million people, recently the state’s Legislative Assembly published a new law enacted by January 13, 2022, authorizing the use of hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, and ivermectin in the treatment COVID-19.


    Published recently in the media Journal Electronico Floresta, Rudinei Sbalchiero reports that while there is “no scientific proof” that these repurposed drugs effectively treat COVID-19, the state’s legislative assembly approved the law anyway. TrialSite, with a team in Brazil, reported that the key law’s sponsor isn’t a physician.


    Authored by Deputy Chiquinho da Emater, the law was approved by the House of Laws, then forwarded to Governor Marcos Rocha, who held back from any sanctioning of the rule, thus leaving the Assembly to act and convert to law.


    Informed Consent Key

    Moving forward, physicians in the State of Rondônia can treat their patients with early-onset COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, and ivermectin. A fundamental requirement, however: the physician must inform the patient that these treatments are not indicated for SARS-CoV-2, thus the treatment is done off label and the patient must consent.



    This type of process is typical and occurs frequently in medicine in North America until COVID-19—since then, there has been far more federal oversight and influence over the doctor and patient relationship


    https://www.florestanoticias.com/2022/01/18/assembleia-legislativa-promulga-lei-autorizando-uso-da-cloroquina-e-ivermectina-em-rondonia/

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    One more UK attempt to stop the destruction of children's live by unnecessary gene therapy.


    Citing Myocarditis Data, 30+ Experts Call on UK Regulators to Reassess COVID Vaccines for 12- to 15-Year-Olds
    In a letter to the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation, more than 30 politicians, doctors and medical experts said long-term effects from COVID…
    childrenshealthdefense.org


    The JCVI estimated that for every one million 12-15-year-olds vaccinated with two doses, 2.54 ICU admissions would be avoided and up to 51 cases of myocarditis caused. Subsequently, the risk of myocarditis and other adverse events has been shown to be greater than believed by the JCVI at the time.


    There should be a no go age limit for RNA gene therapy. People younger than 40 should not take it all as the vaccine risk is much higher than the benefit...

    Quote from THHuxleynew

    This just does not make sense, it confused coincidence with causality.

    This comment is not about the Dr. James story, but about this sentence.... and the popular statement that is becoming so often used... and at times abused .


    "Correlation does not imply causation"


    I have read this many times here and am beginning to think it is starting to become a crutch for some.


    Yes, I fully understand that the statement at is basis is true and in real life "can" certainly be true. But on the other hand... something being "Correlation" does not prove it false either!


    This is where the statement is becoming far, far to reaching... some here communicate "correlation = false", as if fact.

    Dismissing correlation entirely, as if it does not suggest causation at all... This would dismiss a large swath of important scientific evidence. No, correlation does not prove anything, but it IS evidence. It may be weak, strong or as much of the time, completely unknown. But to totally dismiss something simply because it is correlation is foolish.


    Especially if the total package of "correlation evidence" ALL starts pointing to a particular outcome.


    Proof? No. Blindly dismiss because of "dogma".....unwise.





    The Omicron race

    John wright SA UK US

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    It appears that heaven allows vaccinated patients

    Feedback,,

    May: 95% protection
    June: 70% protection
    July: 50% protection
    August: no protection but reduces spread
    September: doesn't reduce spread, but reduces severity.
    Oct: doesn't reduce severity, but reduces hospitalizations
    Nov: doesn't reduce hospitalizations, but you aren't going to die


    Dec: you die, but atleast you go to heaven

    Quote from Bob#2

    I have read this many times here and am beginning to think it is starting to become a crutch for some.


    Yes, I fully understand that the statement at is basis is true and in real life "can" certainly be true. But on the other hand... something being "Correlation" does not prove it false either!


    This is where the statement is becoming far, far to reaching... some here communicate "correlation = false", as if fact.


    Dismissing correlation entirely, as if it does not suggest causation at all... This would dismiss a large swath of important scientific evidence. No, correlation does not prove anything, but it IS evidence. It may be weak, strong or as much of the time, completely unknown. But to totally dismiss something simply because it is correlation is foolish.

    Bob - I agree with you.


    Where we perhaps differ is the way we would approach the problem. I would look for considered scientific evaluation of evidence.


    My point about this anecdotal evidence is that it does not sway any sane judgement, but it is good PR and most lay people would weight its merit much higher than any expert trying to work things out.


    Drug discovery is a really tough problem in cases where the disease is new and only a few people die. Observational data, historically, has proven to be very poor with large false positives, even when things have not been politicised in the way that ivermectin and hcq were in the pandemic. What we have for ivermectin is a whole load of evidence of differing quality. The question is how you put that evidence together. I am persuaded by the fact that the highest quality evidence (there is a lot of this) is roughly neutral;, and that as you reduce quality the apparent effect gets larger. Roughly neutral does not mean ivermectin does not work, and you can always try different doses, different applications, etc. It is however discouraging and that evidence weights so much higher than anecdoptal stories - of basically zero quality because you know they would exist for drugs that did not work.


    And everyone went off HCQ when it showed definite negative results in a big high quality trial.

    Actual data from Australia Jan. 16...


    A good sample for "Simpson's paradox" 😉 --> more double vaxx people in hospital and ICUs than unvaxx ( 👍 for Wyttenbach 😁), but since there is like in other countries a high vaccination rate in NSW, the risk of ending up in hospital for unvaxx is of course much higher than the risk for double vaxx persons. Similar numbers shown from other countries here in several posts...So no real vaccination effect???

    See numbers below...


    https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/699518/20220120-COVID-19-Monitor.pdf


    This one for Wyttenbach:



    This one for the risk of unvaxx and double vaxx hospital / ICU rates:


    RB - do you actually factor in variants chnaging: orioginal -> alpha -> delta -> omicron? And look at which varient these statements - when made - applied to.


    If your complaint is that US statements seemed to be based on original variant for a long time, and were overly certain, when alpha and then delta were clearly going to dominate fair enough.


    But if you are saying somehow that the scientists had false confidence and kept changing their minds that is unfair. I remember everyone saying, for every new variant, that they were not sure how well vaccines would work. And I also remember it being very difficult to get more than guess-style evidence on this for a long time. For obvious reasons: we can't do RCTs, and every other way of counting has big uncertainties (which antivaxxers don't consider, of course).



    Quote from RobertBryant

    Dec: you die, but atleast you go to heaven

    UK delta wave experience has shown that fully vaccinated people die much much less. They also are less likely to end up in hospital. Even given the above uncertainties that remains true.


    The success of Covid-19 vaccines against omicron: Vaccinated up to five times less likely to be hospitalized
    Partial data collected in Spain and extensive analysis in the UK show that immunized individuals are at a much lower risk of being admitted to hospital or…
    english.elpais.com


    Spain’s sixth coronavirus wave, driven by the highly transmissible omicron variant, has multiplied positive cases among both unvaccinated and vaccinated people, with almost 1.4 million infections reported since the beginning of January and thousands more going unreported. However, Covid-19 vaccines are proving highly effective in protecting against severe infection. While pinpointing the exact level of this protection is complex, partial data collected in Spain and extensive analysis in the United Kingdom show that vaccinated individuals are at a much lower risk of being hospitalized or dying from the virus.


    Note that unlike the data antivaxxers quote this data is broken up into narrow age groups.


    Hmm... I wonder why that makes a difference. :)


    I agree though that omicron is so far away from the original vaccine that the evidence for protection 8 months from a double jab is low, and we have no evidence for whether protection 8 months from a 3rd vaccination against omicron will be be zero or good. All we know is that 2 months from a booster there is good protection.


    We also have evidence that reactogenic side effects increase with each jab, and start off a bit on the high side, so continued boosters look a bad policy.


    Luckily omicron waves seem to be short and sharp so we do not need continued boosters! Also, luckily, 2nd gen vaccines a now getting close to usability.


    THH

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.