The Playground

Quote from SSC

If you read Rossi's patent (Fluid heater) you realize there are some aspects that are a little more complicated than the simplistic way you see things. For example, you can read about a voltage modulation at claim 19:

[...] wherein said controller is configured to monitor a temperature from said temperature sensor, and, based at least in part on said temperature, to reinvigorate a reaction in said fuel mixture, wherein reinvigorating said reaction comprises varying a voltage of said voltage source.

A third party might not be able to get the desired effect from the E-Cat if it does not know how it should work. Moreover, if it were such a banal object, they would have replicated it everyone with the same results as Rossi. As for point 4, if you had a revolutionary discovery, would you really trust in an NDA? I believe that, like Rossi, you would like to show your invention personally or at least to be present during the test.

SSC - it takes a while for you to read what i say. I have said nothing about how simple of complex the controller in the black box should be - merely that it can be inside the black box making your point here wrong. If it has to be a human being continuously monitoring things then Rossi has no commercial nor even practically usable product. In most of the cases we know about, anyway, the devices worked fine and stably without human intervention for long periods. Human intervention seemed necessary during the GPT, but there is an alternate possible reason for that, as I'm sure you can understand.

The Rossi Saga continues:

After the successful first season

"Rossi and IH joined forces and will proof the incredible E-Cat as a world saving power source"

we got the second season

"Rossi sues IH and the E-Cat is nothing but a fake (watch out for the heat exchanger!), and the much more incredible X-Factor becomes public"

We got the intermediate season "Pacemaker, Jury, Settlement!"

And now:

Presenting "The E-Cat QX, the DEVICE, so simple, but SOOOO powerfull, you can't imagine!"

Better than the second season of "Preacher" (Not!) and more complex and surreal than "Twin Peaks" (Not!)

SCNR!

Quote from Adrian Ashfield

That's funny. You can make libelous statements about Rossi, but when I complain about that it gets censored?

You are not "censored", I can read your posting.

I've blocked you, but in error I opened your post ....

Quote from Tony

Well, it seems there is a lot of guessing on limited information. Sort of a like buss load of blind and death people discussing art and music and trying to make is out as if they have a clue.

Yes, there does appear to be a lot of guessing. But you surely did not include my name in your list because of that, because I have not ventured any guesses.

But one must ask why we are left to guessing. This is presumably a draft scientific paper uploaded to Arxiv. One wonders what Gullstrom is thinking.

Moved from the E-Cat QX thread. Eric

I'll go even further, stefan. Critical consideration of all of the ways that an experiment can be misleading or go wrong is the normal process of science, applied here with kid gloves on a hobbyist forum. What we're doing is an approximation, and surely a poor one of that, of rigor at the level that actual scientists use in assessing one another's work. We're being kind.

Moved from the E-Cat QX thread. Eric

Quote from Tony

Ah, like all those people who become experts on different sports in their living room sofa...

If you do not like the topic being discussed or are not interested in addressing specific details, you are free to post in another topic or on a forum better able benefit from your unique talents and gifts.

Moved from the E-Cat QX thread. Eric

Tony, feel free to discuss meta stuff in this thread.

Eric Walker,

Checking this with you because you helped with technical details before.

The below post was edited by THHuxleynew i believe. However, the new post does not show the "edited footnote".

1. Can you please be so kind to check if this post was indeed edited?

2. If so, can you point me to the configuration details. I cannot find the setting.

Thanks!

JB

New E-Cat QX Picture and New Rossi-Gullstrom Paper (Very high COP reported with Calorimetry)

Hi Alan Smith,

Thanks.

Do you know how he gets rid of the "edited" footnote?

I thought this was a "mod only" feature. Perhaps it comes with a higher "status" (THH is a "professional"). I cannot find the setting.

Cheers,

JB

PS Testing edits.

Quote from we_cat_global

Eric Walker,

Checking this with you because you helped with technical details before.

The below post was edited by THHuxleynew i believe. However, the new post does not show the "edited footnote".

1. Can you please be so kind to check if this post was indeed edited?

2. If so, can you point me to the configuration details. I cannot find the setting.

Thanks!

JB

New E-Cat QX Picture and New Rossi-Gullstrom Paper (Very high COP reported with Calorimetry)

Display More

Full disclosure. I was careless with the pic and did not read it properly. So I initially thought it has a parallel ckt. However, on closer inspection prompted by Malcolm I realised the error. Probably the first edit was because I correct any typos i see. The second would be replacing the initial careless post by the correct one. I did not let it stand since I realised the mistake very soon after making the post, before others. In any case the first post which I apologised for shows the error. I stand by the other parts of that post though.

I should also point out that anyone liking a post is free on reflection to unlike it at some later date, or if it has been edited.