Display MoreHere the actual UK data
Without discussing that vaccinated contains also > 50% recovered we can see that the rates (from 100) of protection for age classes > 70 that make 97% of all deaths is about 30% 70% for unvaxx. Now comes the problem. What is the data set?
This age group is about 95..96% vaccinated!
So if you take 100 ICU cases then 90 are double vaxx. So official data confirms that ICU is filled by double vaxx. FUD'ers always mix rate and data set. So we can clearly see who reads fools journals...
Here the raw data::
The double vaxx death candidates ages class deliver about 3868 ICU cases. The unvaxx 465...
What can we learn? Protection from vaccines still is here in the range of 20..40% (Here we have to reduce the vaccine group with recovered).
For the younger protection is much better. But their death risk is about the same as a car accident...But they block ICU for other people.
W's account. Not fully explained but if he is lumping together all patients > 70 he is deliberately getting Simpson's Paradox.
Here is somone doing the analysis with proper expalnatuion - so if you don't believe it you can say exactly where it is wrong. It would be very helpful for W to either do that, or accept the analysis. It deals with all-cause deaths which is the most artifact-free measure, and shows clearly why large age ranges cause misleading results:
And, for fun, how about this?
W would, by analogous arguments to what he uses for vaccine efficacy, undoubtedly think that watching 1984 ghostbusters killed people.