The Playground

Here once more (linked two months ago) goody for our FM/R/B mafia friends:

The great PCR test world wide used to suppress the population and order fringe protection rules.

As you can see, starting with a CT cycle of 26 > 60% are false positive = non infectious samples.

After CT=29 <20% are infectious or had a lasting CoV-19 infection (second week test). Also very low CT value are > 10% false positive. Typically made post nasal infection containing a lot of virus fragments.

Germany still uses 40 cycles what leads to 100% fake positives. Most countries use 35 as cut off what agrees with the 100% fake positive afterwards.

But why does everybody count the in total 80% fake positive as infections with CT > 25 ??

from:: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603

Quote from Fm1

The company targets a number of indications including COVID-19

Ivermectin is 10 cents a pill 3 needed for a cure in average. But the nasal NO spray is still way better than to be a guinea pig for gene therapy...

Does this sound familiar with another possible Covid treatment? They want you to live on the edge!

From the NIH website

There is insufficient evidence to recommend either for or against the use of vitamin D for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19," reads a page on a section of the National Institutes of Health website dedicated to explaining what research says about COVID-19 and various supplements.

Quote from stefan

Re spike protein. I'm not a virologist but better at information theory. Yes targeting the spike protein is not a stupid idea and hopefully we will get more robust

vaccines as development continue.

I will just note that it could be advantageous for the immune system to combine matching of spikes with other proteins. It would mean that you can allow a more

robust match of the spike if you also know that it matches A,B,C. If not this means that the immune system depends on very specific details of the spike protein else

if it can do more advanced matches on the whole virus it can concentrate on matching robustly. I think that many here thinks that matching is only for one protein,

maybe it is so, but then that is not optimal. Then I thought that neurons might be involved in the immune system as it allows for much more advanced control.

Actually I found this neurons and immune system

Display More

There are better ways. Targeting the N protein for example

Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19

Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19 - Nature Reviews Immunology

As the world races to develop vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, Dai and Gao highlight which viral targets are best to include in a vaccine and how this impacts the…

www.nature.com

The N protein is the most abundant viral protein and is highly immunogenic during CoV infections139. It is a major target for antibody responses and also contains T cell epitopes140. N-specific antibodies were reported to protect mice against mouse hepatitis virus, a mouse CoV, via Fc-mediated effector functions141,142. However, anti-N immune sera did not protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a mouse model16. Immunization with N protein can also elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in mice143. N-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes are known to protect chickens against IBV infection144. Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon particles expressing an N-specific CD4+ T cell epitope showed complete protection against SARS-CoV infection138. These virus replicon particles also conferred partial cross-protection against MERS-CoV owing to the protein sequence conservation between viruses, resulting in a reduced viral load138. However, its potential as a CoV vaccine target was largely undermined by early studies of SARS-CoV showing that vaccines expressing N protein did not provide protection and, on the contrary, enhanced infection-induced pneumonia via increased pulmonary eosinophil infiltration and TH2 cell-biased responses39,41, causing ERD. Therefore, the inclusion of N protein in CoV vaccines is complicated by balancing viral clearance and immunopathogenesis and no N protein-based vaccine has been reported for COVID-19.

Quote from The Gauleiter of Zurich

Einstein himself speaks... or better pebble ...

https://www.oatext.com/pdf/JTS-3-186.pdf

The study is 100x more clear than most FUD spread by the CoV-19 gene therapy ( claimed vaccine) mafia.

Einstein LOL. Aren’t you the one claiming to have a new and revolutionary understanding of physics?

Basically you are the Swiss Cherepanov.

Anyway… That paper you dug out is the same as Zephir (a.k.a. The Czech Wyttenbach) spammed us with recently. It involves parents who homeschool their children (i.e. ‘weirdos’) who self-diagnose their unfortunate children with ‘illnesses’, on questionnaires sent to/targeted at them by the ‘scientists’.

It was retracted from the first journal it was published in, only to be republished by a second predatory journal, in return for lots of money.

…Should send them your magnum dopus. If you ask nicely maybe they’ll let Curbina peer review it.

Talking of the Swiss, it seems the majority of them are fed up of the anti-vaxxers, and actually voted en-masse to continue banning them from social places and universities.

Covid: Swiss back government on Covid pass as cases surge

Sunday's referendum is held in a country with one of the lowest vaccination rates in Western Europe.

www.bbc.co.uk

Quote from Fm1

Suppose our candidate substances were vitamin C or D. Might we improve humankind’s immune systems world-wide for less than $500 per person per year? What might be the offsetting benefits from lower healthcare costs or greater productivity from such an investment? We don’t know, of course, but the arithmetic makes it clear that it would be well worth our while to learn whether this might be so. Pick a suite of matched country pairs (or province pairs). For each pair, invest $500 per person for a dose of C and a dose of a placebo; in another pair, $500 for a dose of D and a dose of placebo; . . . a dose of ivermectin and a dose of placebo.

We should soon discover which of these substances show efficacy; and we would do no harm! In underdeveloped populations suffering from malnutrition, parasites or malaria, a substantial investment in such trials would certainly produce some good without harm apart from the opportunity cost of not spending $500/person/year on some other worthy purpose such as education or sanitation. The pay-off comes in the developing world. Suppose we discovered which of these substances worked. The developed countries’ cost savings in healthcare and productivity would easily pay for all the trials in underdeveloped countries.

You can't do a trial matching countries: the matching is never good enough and also you can't blind things easily.

You can do double-blind RCTs in any one country and get proper data, if they are large enough. So far vitamins have not alas proven to have any great effect on immune systems - whereas good vitamins correlate with good diet, health, etc so in any non-interventional trial you get positive results.

Mendelian randomisation is one way round this but only if the genetic markers used do not themselves have side effects that correlate with what you are measuring (as I remember the latest one I say did).

I think it is worth testing a whole load of things to do with diet. Long experience teaches us that the only way to do that is (expensive) large double-blind randomised interventionist trials.

THH

Quote from Wyttenbach

As you can see, starting with a CT cycle of 26 > 60% are false positive = non infectious samples.

After CT=29 <20% are infectious or had a lasting CoV-19 infection (second week test). Also very low CT value are > 10% false positive. Typically made post nasal infection containing a lot of virus fragments.

Germany still uses 40 cycles what leads to 100% fake positives. Most countries use 35 as cut off what agrees with the 100% fake positive afterwards.

But why does everybody count the in total 80% fake positive as infections with CT > 25 ??

from:: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603

Display More

Every PCR test in Germany has been positive? Sounds unlikely, do you have actual official statistics saying that figure?

I know its only anecdotal, but I know plenty of people in the UK that have had negative result PCR tests, less than have had positive results.

How can that be if your statements are true?

Quote from Fm1

There are better ways. Targeting the N protein for example

Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-00480-0

The N protein is the most abundant viral protein and is highly immunogenic during CoV infections139. It is a major target for antibody responses and also contains T cell epitopes140. N-specific antibodies were reported to protect mice against mouse hepatitis virus, a mouse CoV, via Fc-mediated effector functions141,142. However, anti-N immune sera did not protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a mouse model16. Immunization with N protein can also elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in mice143. N-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes are known to protect chickens against IBV infection144. Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus replicon particles expressing an N-specific CD4+ T cell epitope showed complete protection against SARS-CoV infection138. These virus replicon particles also conferred partial cross-protection against MERS-CoV owing to the protein sequence conservation between viruses, resulting in a reduced viral load138. However, its potential as a CoV vaccine target was largely undermined by early studies of SARS-CoV showing that vaccines expressing N protein did not provide protection and, on the contrary, enhanced infection-induced pneumonia via increased pulmonary eosinophil infiltration and TH2 cell-biased responses39,41, causing ERD. Therefore, the inclusion of N protein in CoV vaccines is complicated by balancing viral clearance and immunopathogenesis and no N protein-based vaccine has been reported for COVID-19.

Display More

What does that picture remind you of?

Well - it is the playground here!

Quote from Zeus46

What the new German Hitler says:: Basically you are the Swiss Cherepanov.

But he owns the same moronic sound as his idol as nobody knows/understands what this means....

Just remember our fascist friend Zeus46 supports killing people by not treating them with Ivermectin/HCQ,etc... He supports the abuse of children by giving them an experimental gene therapy. He supports masking children, stay home fro children that did lead to record numbers of children in ICU dying from RSV, record number of children doing suicide or thinking about it.

All this happens because fascists like Zeus46 spend their time for helping these disgusting people.

Quote from Nar

Every PCR test in Germany has been positive?

Are you a child? Like some others here? Did you study the graphics? All claimed positive CT > 35 are fake. But only a few tests end up in this group.

Quote from Wyttenbach

But he owns the same moronic sound as his idol as nobody knows/understands what this means....

Just remember our fascist friend Zeus46 supports killing people by not treating them with Ivermectin/HCQ,etc... He supports the abuse of children by giving them an experimental gene therapy. He supports masking children, stay home fro children that did lead to record numbers of children in ICU dying from RSV, record number of children doing suicide or thinking about it.

All this happens because fascists like Zeus46 spend their time for helping these disgusting people.

Something to swallow, think about and internalize for our skilled in the art of using smart language from Switzerland…

No, vaccine and masking mandates are nothing like Nazi Germany

When COVID deniers and people who refute data-driven public health policy wrongly invoke the Holocaust, they pervert history,

www.wgbh.org

Israel: Boosters seem to work for the older as the death rate did go down to 3..4/day. For the last 4 weeks 43 unvaxx died and 17 2/3x vaxx. So protection overall is > 80%. (about 67% are vaccinated). But cases remain fairly elevated at 400..500/day. After last vaccination phase these did go down to almost 0. So it is easily to predict that they only bought a few months.

ICU level still are still at 120 +-10 (weekend effect).

But all Cov-19 measure are irrational in face of 2 deaths/day....

Biden the town crier of Big Pharma tells people to take - "useless boosters - non working for omicron". This is a last effort to sell crap before a new better fitting version possibly will be sold. But but this would need an even more fundamental violation of all existing medical and institutional rules/laws... A new RNA is a new drug. Just because these share the name the have nothing in common except made from RNA...

May be in future big pharma is allowed to sell everything as similar. So we soon will see them selling crack as pain reliever and speed for erectile dysfunction...

UK now recommends a booster every three months. Last shot in crematorium to protect the birds...

COVID-19 injection protocols may be leaving patients at risk

COVID-19 injection protocols may be leaving patients at risk

Two known side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations, blood clots and myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), could be linked to wrongly administered

trialsitenews.com

Two known side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations, blood clots and myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), could be linked to wrongly administered vaccines, where the injection is accidentally made into the bloodstream instead of the muscle. TrialSite recently covered reports of blood clots in J&J vaccine recipients, and myocarditis in recipients of mRNA vaccines such as Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna. Some experts in the medical field strongly urge medical personnel to ‘aspirate before they vaccinate’.

The US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) monitors vaccine adverse events on its VAERS database, and confirms that myocarditis can occur in mRNA vaccine recipients, especially in male adolescents and young adults. An Israeli study that examined adverse events post-vaccination found that the incidence of myocarditis was 2.1 cases per 100,000 persons, and male patients were more vulnerable with 10.7 cases per 100,000 persons. Life-threatening blood clotting events are well-documented, and are estimated to take place 1 in every 50,000 individuals.

Scientists are yet to find a reason for blood clots and heart inflammation post-vaccination. One factor that could account for such adverse events is the accidental administration of vaccines, where the vaccine is delivered into a vein instead of the deltoid muscle of the upper arm. One recent study https://trialsitenews.com/covi…mmatory-markers-acs-risk/ by the well-known surgeon turned lifestyle health guru Steven Gundry raises some important and relevant points.

‘Aspirate to vaccinate’

During vaccination, medical personnel first insert a needle into the injection site, then push the plunger to deliver the vaccine. But there’s an intermediate step. Aspiration is the practice of pulling back the plunger for 5-10 seconds before injecting the medication. This is done to ensure that the needle has not hit a vein. If the needle does pierce a vein, the syringe fills with blood, and the medication should not be delivered. If not, the needle has been correctly inserted, and the vaccine can be safely administered.

The necessity for aspirating a syringe is contested by health authorities from different countries. In many parts of the world, WHO guidelines from the Immunization in practice: a guide for healthcare workers are followed, where aspiration is not mentioned as a necessary step to inject a medication. The US Emergency Medical Services (EMS) deems needle aspiration unnecessary for administering SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The UK Green Book, which comprises the latest information on vaccines and vaccination procedures, does not recommend aspiration, and neither do Canada’s public health authorities. The reason cited for discontinuing the practice is that aspiration causes unnecessary pain to recipients, is not significantly associated with any benefits, and is a wastage of expensive resources.

However, Danish health authorities from the Statens Serum Institut (SSI) recommend aspiration as a precautionary principle on their website, “in connection with the occurrence of rare but severe blood clotting events”. The institute’s webpage, updated on March 18, 2021, includes a step for aspirating the needle. Scientists who performed a literature review in 2014 on aspirating before injections noted that the published literature supports aspiration. They strongly recommend aspiration when the consequences of a medication entering the blood are dangerous or fatal.

Consequences of vaccines directly entering the blood circulation

Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines contain mRNA molecules that code for a SARS-CoV-2 viral protein, which triggers the immune system to launch a defense against it. When these mRNA particles are accidentally injected into the blood, they cause acute myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart lining). Myocarditis is prevalent in young adult men between the ages of 18-24 who have received mRNA vaccine injections. Dr. John Campbell, in his YouTube video Giving injections wrongly, hypothesizes that this age group’s vulnerability could be due to increased muscle mass and therefore larger blood vessels, which increase the risk of accidental injections into a vein.

Injection of vaccines directly into the bloodstream can also cause nerve damage. Thromboembolism (blood clotting) and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) are other adverse events that have been consistently reported with adenoviral vector vaccines such as Oxford-AstraZeneca and J&J. The intravenous administration of adenoviral particles is known to cause thromboembolism in mice models. Within 5-24 hours, adenovirus particles activate platelets, which rapidly associate with other cells in the blood such as white blood cells, clumping them together to form aggregates. Blood clotting and low platelet counts are known consequences of injecting adenovirus vectors intravenously, and could therefore account for incidents of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) in vaccine recipients.

It is clear that significant and clinically severe risks exist when vaccines are accidentally injected into the bloodstream. Though the incidence of VITT and myocarditis may be relatively rare, there is cause for concern, which could be addressed by updating vaccine protocols to prevent any accidents.

Dr. Campbell summarizes in his video, “I now consider it to be completely unethical that our governing bodies do not advise all of our vaccinators to take precautions against inadvertent intravascular intravenous administration. This has crossed over from ignorance into negligence if they don’t act on this soon

Quote from Zephir_AWT

We Saw This Coming... Increased Risk of New Variant Infection in the Vaccinated Only Preprint of a study shows increased risk of infection in the vaccinated. We Tried To Warn You.

I think you are misreading that.

In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.

ie The paper compares the risk of those who have already HAD covid19 to those who have been vaccinated.

Without re-researching, I think that immunity from having had covid is better than the vaccine (because of its multi-protein protection, wheras the vaccine is targeted to the spike, which mutates more). But to get there you have to have survived the initial covid19 infection.

The biggest risk is still to those who are UN-vaccinated.

Quote from Alan Smith

Many scholars point to a variety of possibilities, which include one of the highest vaccination rates among advanced countries with 75.7% of residents fully vaccinated as of Wednesday. Other potential factors are the social distancing and mask-wearing measures that are now deeply embedded in Japanese society.

But the chief reason may be related to the genetic changes that the coronavirus undergoes during reproduction,

I don't buy that. The fall in cases is what you would expect from the rising curve of vaccinations when they reach ~70%. It is similar to the curves in Israel and Argentina. Granted, vaccines alone are not enough to produce this curve. There can be other factors disrupting it, as there are in S. Korea. (I do not know what the cause of their present wave is.) But in a country such as Japan, where people routinely wear masks most years in winter, and where there are no large groups of people objecting to masks and other public health measures, you will see this curve. I do not think the virus spontaneously self-destructed in Israel or Argentina.

70% does not tell the full story. There are other factors involved. You must have a reasonably uniform distribution of vaccinations. Atlanta and some other parts of Georgia are probably at 70%, but the state as a whole is mired at 53%. So there are large rural communities with only ~30%. They are reservoirs of infection. There can be no herd immunity in them. A more even distribution of vaccinations puts firewalls of herd immunity in every community, so the effective reproduction number (Rt) falls below 1 and cases gradually decline, approaching zero. As things are in Georgia, people in rural communities are in nearly as much danger as they were in 2020, and they are certain to bring infections and breakthrough infections to Atlanta. In a pandemic, there can be no safety for anyone unless everyone is safe.

Japan: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps

Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily

graphics.reuters.com

South Korea: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps

Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily

graphics.reuters.com

Israel: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps

Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily

graphics.reuters.com

Argentina: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps

Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily

graphics.reuters.com

Hmm does not look like we have an exponential increase in hospitalisatoins, and ICU cases, more like a slow linear increase. If it is

exponential then it's a much slower growth factor than before, And R should be really high atm as we live just as before covid.