The Playground

  • I know nothing about Italian law, but I suspect that paying for a "professional" evaluation which is then "withdrawn" would be laywer-fodder in the US. At the very least, a refund of all monies paid. "Clients" relying on the report ... possible libel ... UoB's got deep pockets, I suspect.

    I also know nothing about Italian law, but I suspect any possible liability would only go so far as the value of the contract. The contract will have been written (boiler plate) by UNIBO in the main part and of course they don't put themselves at legal/financial risk. This is just how these sorts of things work.


    Notice that Rossi did not demand/suggest a re-test fixing the issues (which are only the ones that Levi chose to mention). Given that any such re-test would, I think, not be allowed by UNIBO with Levi operating solo again (or possibly involved at all), we all know that it isn't going to happen.

  • Total freedom for Switzerland !


    Big pharma NAZI terror ends Tomorrow 24:00 (31.3.2022)


    Not even infected have to isolate any longer! Omicron is a cold and as since ever nobody must isolate due to a cold. Of course many still will do it as there are strong colds and soft colds.

  • That was from six months ago, when the proportion of seniors to younger people vaccinated was much more. It hardly applies anymore now.

    It applies completely. The only vaccinated people who are hospitalized or dying are very old, or very ill with cancer or some other serious disease that affects their immune system. Look at a group of vaccinated and unvaccinated healthy people below age 50, with no major comorbidities. You will see that the unvaccinated people are roughly 100 times more likely to die from COVID. Yet some hospitals in some countries have about equal numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated people under 50. That is because of the base rate fallacy. For example, in Japan nearly the entire adult population has been vaccinated. Roughly 99%. Where there are equal numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated people in a Japanese hospital, that is because unvaccinated people (1% of the population) are roughly 100 times more likely to get seriously ill.

  • As I said, the base rate fallacy is why about half of healthy young adult COVID patients hospitalized in Japan are vaccinated. Because they are 99% of the population. An unvaccinated young adult is roughly 100 times more likely to be hospitalized, but there are very few unvaccinated people, so their numbers in the hospital are not proportional to their numbers in the general population.


    In the U.S., in many places, ~60% of the young adult population in vaccinated. That means the hospitalized population is closer to the proportion in the general population. In U.S. hospitals 90 to 95% of patients are unvaccinated. The 5 to 10% who are vaccinated come from the 60% pool. They are much less likely to get sick, and about 100 times less likely to die. Young patients with no comorbidities who die are virtually all unvaccinated. Some doctors say they have never seen a young, vaccinated patient die. Many older vaccinated patients do die. The risk of dying at age 70 is greater for vaccinated people than for unvaccinated people age 30, as shown here:


  • How Jed can say that 99 percent of the Japanese population is vaccinated is beyond me.

    In Canada about 82 percent of the entire population is vaccinated, and Japan trails Canada slightly.


    Here are some numbers to contemplate :

    In Ontario hospital ICUs (Intensive Care Units), lately about two thirds of Covid patients are at least fully jabbed.

    Thus the ratio of jabbed to unjabbed in ICU is 2 : 1

    The adult population ratio of jabbed to unjabbed is about 8 : 1

    So, being fully jabbed lowers ICU risk about four fold.


    In the last two years in Ontario up to present, almost 8,000 people have been admitted to ICU for Covid.

    The population of Ontario adults over age 35 is about 8,000,000.

    Thus the chance of admittance to ICU with Covid for those over 35 was 1 in 1000.

    (Of course almost all of those admitted are older and/or with comorbidities)


    Assuming Covid is as virulent in the population as it has averaged over the last two years (unlikely!), a fully jabbed person over the age of 35 in the next year lowers his risk of an ICU visit from .4 in 1000 to .1 in 1000.


    Given dropping jab efficacy against hospitalization, negative jab efficacy against infection, and increasing evidence of jab induced immunodeficiency, the continued pushing of injections in Ontario is looking increasingly misplaced and as appropriate as an Oscarian slap in the face.

  • First Look at Newly Released Pfizer Docs, Part 2: The ‘not necessary’ safety studies


    https://trialsitenews.com/first-look-at-newly-released-pfizer-docs-part-2/https://trialsitenews.com/first-look-at-newly-released-pfizer-docs-part-2/


    By Sonia Elijah


    In Part 1 of my investigative report for TrialSite News, having reviewed thousands of Case Report Forms in relation to the FDA’s latest release of Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial documents, the analysis uncovered many critical errors and anomalies, raising critical questions as to the integrity of the clinical trial data—had the data been compromised?


    In Part 2, I take an in-depth look at the confidential ‘Nonclinical Overview’ document.


    The case of the missing CRF files

    Before proceeding on summarizing that document, another anomaly must be addressed, this time in relation to the number of Case Report Forms (CRFs) released per participant; the total number of participants for Pfizer’s trial and the number of pages the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have confirmed they’ve received from Pfizer. In the court papers, the American regulatory agency revealed that they had received all of Pfizer’s 450,000 papers, in total, after originally stating the figure was around 320,000.



    Around March 1, the FDA released a 3,452 page document from Pfizer compiled of CRFs from site (1128), which oddly accounted for only 13 participants, with an average of 232 files of CRFs per participant.


    When reviewing the CRFs for the other sites (Ventavia’s site #1096), (Sterling Research Group’s site #1081), (Diablo Clinical Research Incorp. Site #1055) on average there are 200-250 pages of CRFs per participant with only around dozen participants accounted for at each clinical site.


    This then begs the critical question- where are all the missing CRFs for the other participants at those sites? We know from the Ventavia and Pfizer whistle-blower, Brook Jackson’s interview by TrialSite News, that just over a thousand participants were enrolled across three of Ventavia’s sites (an average of over 300 participants at each of those sites- including site 1128).


    We also know approximately 43,448 participants in total were enrolled in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Based on these numbers, the total number of CRFs would be around 10 million- a far cry from the number of pages the FDA say they’ve received from Pfizer.


    The section below is taken from the FDA’s brief in advance of scheduling conference court papers.


    On November 4, 2021, Plaintiff provided FDA with the below list of records they requested FDA prioritize for processing (“Plaintiff’s Priority List”) in order of priority:


    1. CRFs for site 1055 (from page 27 of the provided Index)


    2. CRFs for site 1081 (from page 31 of the provided Index)


    3. CRFs for site 1096 (from page 38 of the provided Index


    4. CRFs for site 1128 (from page 46 of the provided Index)


    Monday, January 31, 2022: FDA proposes to produce publicly releasable information from Plaintiff’s priority item #4 – CRF files for site 1128 (approximately 3,452 pages)


    The information above confirms the FDA had ‘approximately 3,452 pages’ of CRF files for Ventavia’s site 1128. This is the total number the agency states from their own court papers, therefore the possibility that the remaining CRF files from that site could be later released according to the 8-month production schedule, does not appear credible.


    This then raises some further questions- is the FDA withholding the data? Or was that data ever collected by Pfizer and did the FDA simply fail to hold the pharmaceutical company to account? Or are the hundreds of CRF files per participant (many of which appear blank) simply a smokescreen to ‘bulk up the bundle’ giving the illusion that the FDA and Pfizer are complying with the FOIA request by releasing all the data?


    Regardless, these anomalies cannot help but raise critical questions about the FDA’s mandate for transparency with the public.


    The studies conducted and their concerning results

    The confidential nonclinical overview references two repeat-dose toxicity studies in Wistar Han rats. ‘Changes secondary to inflammation included slight and transient reduction in body weights and transient reductions in RETIC, PLT, and RBC mass parameters’ were noted.


    The report goes on to state the ‘administration of BTN162b2 (V8)…was tolerated without evidence of systemic toxicity.’


    However, side effects of the three administrations of the vaccine were referenced.


    ‘Macroscopic pathology and organ weight changes were also consistent with immune activation and inflammatory response and included increased size of draining iliac lymph nodes and increased size and weight of spleen.’


    The inflammatory response noted here is an area of concern, even though the report does not say so. This is because studies have found that the mRNA-LNP (Lipid Nano Particle) platform’s LNP component is highly inflammatory. The authors of the study state ‘Here we present evidence that Acuitas’ LNPs used in preclinical nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine studies are highly inflammatory in mice.’


    Acuitas’ LNPs are components of both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.


    Another concerning result recorded in the repeat-dose toxicology studies, was that ‘Fibrinogen was higher in the vaccine-administered group (up to 3.1x controls)’


    Elevated fibrinogen levels are problematic, given they increase the risk of blood clots which can in turn contribute to an increased risk of heart disease. Thromboembolic events (blood clots) have been reported after the administration of the Covid-19 vaccines.


    A study last summer, published in The Lancet, of over 1 million vaccine recipients, concluded that a rare blood clotting side effect is as likely to occur from a Pfizer vaccine as the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, which has been halted in many countries after reports of blood clots, yet the Pfizer vaccine still continues to be administered.


    The nonclinical overview also included biodistribution data which showed Pfizer’s mRNA lipid nanoparticles accumulated in rats’ livers to a higher degree than other organs, which Trial Site News reported on. According to the study, as much as 60 percent of a 15.3 mg/kg analyte dose of ALC-0315 surrogate luciferase RNA was found in male rats’ livers. And as much as 20 percent of a 1.96 mg/kg analyte dose of ALC-0159 was found in male rats’ livers.


    Pfizer and BioNTech licensed ALC-0315 and ALC-0519 from Acuitas Therapeutics. They are novel LNPs which make up two of the four components that form the LPNs which encapsulate the fragile mRNA in the vaccine.


    The confidential overview goes on to report that ‘total recovery of LNP outside the injection site was greatest in the liver and was much less in the spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries.’


    This is confirmation from Pfizer that these novel and inflammatory LPNs (ALC-0316 and ALC-0519) were present in the spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries, which is concerning.


    The ‘not necessary’ safety studies

    The nonclinical overview document from Pfizer states, ‘no safety pharmacology studies were conducted…as they are not considered necessary for the development of vaccines according to the WHO guideline (WHO, 2005)’


    This statement cannot help but imply that corners appear to have been cut in regard to safety, as the WHO 2005 guideline on safety pharmacology states:



    The purpose of safety pharmacology is to investigate the effects of the candidate vaccine on vital functions. If data from nonclinical and/or human clinical studies suggest that the vaccine (e.g. one based on specific toxoids) may affect physiological functions (e.g. central

    nervous system, respiratory, cardiovascular and renal functions) other than those of the immune system, safety pharmacology studies should be incorporated into the toxicity assessment.


    What’s interesting is that the confidential nonclinical overview report was approved in February 2021, around the same time the ‘Cumulative analysis of post-authorization adverse event reports’ which I analysed for Trial Site News, alarmingly it included an appendix listing 8 pages of vaccine adverse events, many of which included central nervous system, respiratory and cardiovascular AEs, among others. The data was collected from Dec 1, 2020 through to February 28, 2021. This tells us that Pfizer and the FDA were made aware of these AEs occurring around that time-period, but Pfizer chose to not conduct any safety pharmacology studies because they weren’t deemed ‘necessary.’


    Pharmacokinetic studies were also not conducted with BNT162b2 as they ‘are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO,2005; WHO, 2014)


    WHO 2005 guidelines states:


    ‘Pharmacokinetic studies (e.g. for determining serum or tissue concentrations of vaccine components) are normally not needed. The need for specific studies should be considered on a case-by-case basis (e.g. when using novel adjuvants (a class of excipients) or alternative routes of administration).


    Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity studies were also not deemed necessary by Pfizer and BioNTech, so they were not conducted, with the same WHO 2005 guideline excuse given. However, the above WHO 2005 guideline in relation to the former pharmacokinetic studies, is also very similar to the latter studies, which states ‘However, they may be required for particular vaccine components such as novel adjuvants and additives.’


    ALC-0315 and ALC-0519 are novel excipients, therefore these critical safety studies should have been done and it’s shocking how they were ‘not considered necessary’ and neither did the FDA.


    The extract below is taken from the plaintiff group (Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency) court papers


    The FDA asserts that the Pfizer Vaccine ‘meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product however numerous public health officials and scientists have raised serious questions about the adequacy of the review, the sufficiency and integrity of the data and whether it was appropriate that the FDA license the Pfizer vaccine.’


    In Part 3, this author delves into the recently released document, ‘Request for Priority Review’ for Pfizer-BioNTech’s Biologics Licensing Application (BLA) which the FDA granted under the marketed name, Comirnaty, on August 23, 2021

  • Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19

    List of authors.

    • Gilmar Reis, M.D., Ph.D.,
    • for the TOGETHER Investigators*


    RESULTS

    A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.


    CONCLUSIONS

    Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19. (Funded by FastGrants and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation; TOGETHER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04727424. opens in new tab.)

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869

    Edit: The https://ivmmeta.com site has been updated (reporting deaths).
    I haven't looked at their comments.

  • How Jed can say that 99 percent of the Japanese population is vaccinated is beyond me.

    That is what the Japanese Min. of Health reports. How else would I know? See also:


    Japan: the latest coronavirus counts, charts and maps
    Tracking the COVID-19 outbreak, updated daily
    graphics.reuters.com


    Here is some similar data from Australia. 48% of hospitalized patients are unvaccinated. They are 2% of the population. Again, if you think that because 52% of patients are vaccinated, the vaccine does not work, you do not understand the base rate fallacy.


    Here are some numbers to contemplate :

    In Ontario hospital ICUs (Intensive Care Units), lately about two thirds of Covid patients are at least fully jabbed.

    Thus the ratio of jabbed to unjabbed in ICU is 2 : 1

    The adult population ratio of jabbed to unjabbed is about 8 : 1

    So, being fully jabbed lowers ICU risk about four fold.

    Most sources say it lowers it by around 20 fold. However, there are degrees of illness even within the ICU, or other part of the hospital. My brother was held overnight at a hospital with breakthrough COVID. (I don't know if it was the ICU.) He went home the next day. He was better in a week. If he had been unvaccinated he would almost certainly have been in the ICU for weeks, and he would probably be dead, since he is old and recently had chemotherapy.


    The vaccine reduces serious illness, long hospitalization, and long-haul effect by more than a factor of 20. So, even if your numbers are right, and it only reduces hospitalization by a factor of 4, it reduces dangerous, long term hospitalization by a much larger factor.

  • Total freedom for Switzerland !


    Big pharma NAZI terror ends Tomorrow 24:00 (31.3.2022)


    Not even infected have to isolate any longer! Omicron is a cold and as since ever nobody must isolate due to a cold. Of course many still will do it as there are strong colds and soft colds.

    Congratulations ! You have succeeded to tear down the gas-chambers and concentration camps. Jewish people can travel freely again now.

    The logic for the word "nazi" follows the same one as used by the dictator Putin. Nowadays According to that even the jewish president Zelenskyi is a nazi.


  • Reviewing twenty five years of U.S. funded ‘cold fusion’ projects including patents, contracts, publications and public/private sector partnership efforts towards LENR energy applied engineering and LENR energy commercialization.


    edit 1/30/2018 The government of the United States of America has filed many ‘cold fusion’ patents. These low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) patents take time to develop, often a number of years before filing with a patent office; each being a tedious project unto itself. One patent’s development began with a contract from NSWC, Indian Head Division in 2008, “Deuterium Reactor” US 20130235963 A1, by Pharis Edward Williams. This patent was not filed till 2012, four years later. Also, a delay can occur between the patent filing date and publication date if the patent is deemed a matter of national security. This may be the case with the 2007 SPAWAR patent, System and Method for Generating Particles US8419919B1, with a filing date of Sep. 21, 2007 and publication date of Apr. 16, 2013, a delay of six years. Usually a patent gets published (becomes exposed) within one year of the filing date, rarely longer; for a delay of six years there seems to be no other plausible explanation.


    U.S. LENR patent development has been funded through the Air Force, NASA,

    the Navy and many other Department of Defense labs. The government may retain rights to any of these LENR patents and control licensing agreements. Patent licensing may be granted to those who partnered with government labs in the development of LENR technology, as in SPAWAR JWK LENR technology and the Global Energy Corporation. Included with the patents in this review are U.S. Government funded LENR energy applied engineering programs and presentations, along with a few from related company partners.


    A chronological review of U.S. funded ‘cold fusion’ projects and patents, accompanied with a list of the individuals, companies, universities and agencies involved may be helpful in understanding the history of, and to determine the direction of, United States of America government funded LENR energy technologies entering the marketplace.


    Boeing, General Electric and many others team up with NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration developing LENR aircraft. Both the SpaceWorks contract with NASA and the many University, NASA and Corporate joint LENR aerospace presentations point towards NASA partnering with private industry on spaceplanes and Mars. All of these efforts prepare the way for low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) non-radioactive nuclear flight (NRNF).


    The SPAWAR and JWK partnership developed a different form of LENR energy technology. SPAWAR JWK LENR technology transmutes nuclear waste to benign elements while creating high process heat. The SPAWAR JWK LENR tech group is partnered with Global Energy Corporation (GEC). Applied engineering has culminated in the GEC ‘GeNie’ reactor placed within a gas turbine electrical generating unit called the GEC ‘Small Modular Generator’ (SMG). Recent commercialization claims are, “GEC is currently negotiating several new SMG construction contracts ranging from 250MWe to 5GWe around the world”. This LENR energy technology leads towards massive electrical power generation and the worldwide cleanup of highly radioactive nuclear waste.


    Editor Note: The following is not necessarily part of the review.

    You may include it if you want to.

    “I began to compile this review in the fall of 2017. The reason being, I had asked a few editors of LENR news sites what they thought of the claims being made by Global Energy Corporation. Each editor asked me to provide any recent follow up to those claims. None that I could find; so I decided to compile this review as a frame of reference for the question: What are your opinions of these claims?" - Greg Goble

    Call/send edit suggestions or leads for the review. (510) 772-4469

    [email protected] -end editor note


    United States Government LENR Energy 2018 is open source.



    1993 Air Force Patent “Method of maximizing anharmonic oscillations in deuterated alloys” US5411654A Filed: Jul. 2, 1993 GRANT issued: Feb. 5, 1995 - Inventors: Brian S. Ahern, Keith H. Johnson, Harry R. Clark Jr. - Assignee: Hydroelectron Ventures Inc, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, US Air Force - This invention was made with U.S. Government support under contract No. F19628-90-C-0002, awarded by the Air Force. The Government has certain rights in this invention. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5411654A


    1996 Air Force Patent (a patent continuation) “Amplification of energetic reactions” US20110233061A1 Inventor: Brian S. Ahern - Filing date: Mar 25, 2011 Publication date: Sep 29, 2011. This invention was made with U.S. Government support under contract No. F19-6528-90-C-0002, awarded by the Air Force. The Government has certain rights in this invention. This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/331,007, filed Oct. 28, 1994, now abandoned, which is a division of Ser. No. 08/086,821, filed Jul. 2, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,411,654https://www.google.com/patents/US20110233061A1


    2007 SPAWAR Patent “System and method for generating particles” US8419919B1 Filing: Sep 21, 2007 - Publication: Apr 16, 2013 Assignee: JWK International Corporation, The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy - GRANT Issued: Apr 16, 2013 2007 Inventors: Pamela A. Boss, Frank E. Gordon, Stanislaw Szpak, Lawrence Parker Galloway Forsleyhttps://www.google.com/patents/US8419919B1


    2008 Patent (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech) “A hybrid fusion fast fission reactor” WO2009108331A2 - Publication date: Dec 30, 2009 - Priority date: Feb 25, 2008 Inventors: Lawrence Parker Galloway Forsley, Jay Wook Khim - Applicant: Lawrence Parker Gallow Forsley https://www.google.com/patents/WO2009108331A2


    2008 DoD Grant (2014 patent publication date) “Deuterium Reactor” US20130235963A1 - Filed: Mar 12, 2012 - Publication date: Sep 12, 2013 Inventor: Pharis Edward Williams Original Assignee: Pharis Edward Williams $25,000 was received in 2008 from NSWC, Indian Head Division, to design experiments, review reports, and analyze data. The experiments verified heating using powered/granulated fuel. editor note Quote: “As a United States Department of Defense (DoD) Energetics Center, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division is a critical component of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Warfare Center (WFC) Enterprise. One of the WFC’s nine Divisions, Indian Head’s mission is to research, develop, test, evaluate, and produce energetics and energetic systems for U.S. fighting forces.” It is a 1700-person organization with sites in McAlester, OK; Ogden, UT; Picatinny, NJ and a second site in Indian Head, MD. NSWC IHEODTD has the largest U.S. workforce in the DoD dedicated to energetics and EOD, comprising more than 800 scientists and engineers and 50 active duty military. The business base totals $1.4B. -end note https://www.google.com/patents/US20130235963A1


    2009 thru 2010 NASA-LaRC SpaceWorks Contract (applied engineering)

    Quote: “SpaceWorks conducted separate vehicle design studies evaluating the potential impact of two advanced propulsion system concepts under consideration by NASA Langley Research Center: The first concept was an expendable multistage rocket vehicle which utilized an advanced Air-Augmented Rocket (AAR) engine. The effect of various rocket thrust augmentation ratios were identified the resulting vehicle design where compared against a traditional expendable rocket concept. The second concept leverage Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), a new form of energy generation being studied at NASA LaRC, to determine how to utilize an LENR-based propulsion system for space access. For this activity, two LENR-basedrocket engine propulsion performance models where developed jointly by SpaceWorks and LaRC personnel.” -end quote See: “SpaceWorks Advanced Concepts Group (ACG) Overview” October 2012 PowerPoint presentation, page 31. http://www.sei.aero/eng/papers…ts_Group_ACG_Overview.pdf


    2009 Navy Patent “Excess enthalpy upon pressurization of nanosized metals with deuterium” WO2011041370A1 - Original Assignee: The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy - Inventor: David A. Kidwell - Priority date: Sep 29, 2009 - Publication date: Mar 31, 2011 - GRANT issued: Nov 10, 2015 - The present application claims the benefit of United States Provisional Application Serial No. 61/246,619 by David A. Kidwell, filed September 29, 2009 entitled “ANOMALOUS HEAT GENERATION FROM DEUTERIUM (OR PLATINUM) LOADED NANOPARTICLES.”https://www.google.com/patents/WO2011041370A1


    2009 November Defense Intelligence Agency (LENR report) DIA-08-0911-003 Technology Forecast: “Worldwide Research on Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions Increasing and Gaining Acceptance” Quote, “LENR power sources could produce the greatest transformation of the battlefield for U.S. forces since the transition from horsepower to gasoline power.” -end quote Prepared by: Beverly Barnhart, DIA/DI, Defense Warning Office. With contributions from: Dr. Patrick McDaniel, University of New Mexico; Dr. Pam Mosier-Boss, U.S. Navy SPAWAR/Pacific; Dr. Michael McKubre, SRI International; Mr. Lawrence Forsley, JWK International; and Dr. Louis DeChiaro, NSWC/Dahlgren. Coordinated with DIA/DRI, CPT, DWO, DOE/IN, US Navy SPAWAR/Pacific and U.S. NSWC/Dahlgren,VA. http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BarnhartBtechnology.pdf


    2009 SPAWAR JWK scientists ACS Presentation (news) Issue 85 May/June 2009 Infinite Energy Magazine "Summary of Cold Fusion Sessions at American Physical Society and American Chemical Society Meetings" by Scott Chubb http://www.infinite-energy.com…ricanphysicalsociety.html


    2010 Navy Patent (LENR fuel) “Metal nanoparticles with a pre-selected number of atoms” US 8728197 B2 - Original Assignee: The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy - Inventors: Albert Epshteyn, David A. Kidwell GRANT issued: May 20, 2014 https://www.google.com/patents/US8728197B2


    (editor note) E-Cat’s first public demo by Rossi in January 2011


    2011 Nov. 2 Fox news

    title "Cold Fusion Experiment: Major Success or Complex Hoax?"

    Cold Fusion Experiment: Major Success or Complex Hoax?
    A physicist in Italy claims to have demonstrated a new type of power plant that he says provides safe, cheap and virtually unlimited nuclear power to the…
    www.foxnews.com


    2011 Nov. (SPAWAR LENR news) Quote, “On or about Nov. 9, 2011, Rear Admiral Patrick Brady , commander of SPAWAR, ordered SPAWAR researchers to terminate all LENR research.” -end quote A New Energy Times article titled,“Navy Commander Halts SPAWAR LENR Research” by Steven Krivit http://news.newenergytimes.net/2012/03/01/navy-commander-halts-spawar-lenr-research/


    2011 NASA Patent “Method for Producing Heavy Electrons” US20110255645A1 Inventor: Joseph M. Zawodny - Assignee: USA As Represented By The Administrator Of NASA - Pursuant to 35U.S.C. §119, the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/317,379, with a filing date of Mar. 25, 2010, is claimed for this non-provisional application, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. The invention was made by an employee of the United States Government and may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor. Publication date: Oct 20, 2011 - Filing date: Mar 24, 2011 https://www.google.com/patents/US20110255645A1


    2012 NASA/Boeing Publication (applied engineering) NASA Contract NNL08AA16B – NNL11AA00T “Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research – Phase II N+4 Advanced Concept Development”

    Pg. 24 Even though we do not know the specific cost of the LENR itself, we assumed a cost of jet fuel at $4/gallon and weight based aircraft cost. We were able to calculate cost per mile for the LENR equipped aircraft compared to a conventional aircraft (Figure 3.2). Looking at the plots, one could select a point where the projected cost per mile is 33% less than a conventionally powered aircraft (Heat engine > 1 HP/lb & LENR > 3.5 HP/lb).

    (editor note) The NASA Working Group Report also makes public the following list of organizations and individuals working on the advanced concept contract:

    Boeing

    Marty Bradley, Christopher Droney, Zachary Hoisington, Timothy Allen, Dwaine Cotes, Yueping Guo, Brian Foist, Blaine Rawdon, Sean Wakayama, Emily Dallara, Ed Kowalski, Joe Wa, Ismail Robbana, Sergey Barmichev, Larry Fink, Mithra Sankrithi, Edward White

    General Electric

    Kurt Murrow, Jeff Hammel, Srini Gowda

    Georgia Tech

    Michelle Kirby, Hongjun Ran, Teawoo Nam, Jimmy Tai, Chris Perullo

    Vermont Tech

    Joe Schetz, Rakesh Kapania

    NASA

    Mark Guynn, Erik Olson, Gerald Brown, Larry Leavitt, Richard Wahls, Doug Wells, James Felder, Casey Burley, John Martin

    Federal Aviation Administration

    Rhett Jeffries, Christopher Sequiera

    Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research Phase II: N+4 Advanced Concept Development - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)


    2012 National Institute of Aeronautics and NASA (applied engineering)

    “MPD Augmentation of a Thermal Air Rocket Utilizing Low Energy Nuclear Reactions”Roger Lepsch, NASA Langley Research Center; Matt Fischer, National Institute of Aerospace; Christopher Jones, National Institute of Aerospace; Alan Wilhite, National Institute of Aerospace. Presented at the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, April 26, 2012 https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2012-1351


    2012 Global Energy Corporation news (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)

    Marianas Variety - Micronesia's leading newspaper since 1972

    May 31 title 'Dear Governor Fitial' http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/c…6914-dear-governor-fitial

    IN early May 2012, three of us representing CNMI attended the presentations made by the Global Energy Corp. in San Diego at their laboratory on a new patent-pending, nuclear energy producing technology based on Fusion & Fast Fission.

    The proprietary nuclear reactor technology is called Lattice Assisted Nuclear Energy.

    In the interest of full disclosure, we state here that GEC did not pay for the cost of our attendance. They did pay for some of the meals shared with participants from Guam, Yap, as well as the GEC scientists, manager and principal. We did not receive any honoraria or payment from GEC or from any of its agents.

    Our attitude was always that of skepticism especially since the adjective “nuclear” conjures up scary images of Fukushima, Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island. We were trying to be prudent in that it was taking some time to review the renewable energy, or RE, purchase power agreements in Saipan, and were unsure if they would be the best over-all source of electricity for the CNMI. We asked ourselves what if we made a 20-year commitment to each RE and then along, comes a breakthrough that revolutionize the power generation business?

    Over a three-day period, we listened to presentations made by scientists in the lecture rooms as well as the laboratory and at breakthrough meetings. In the laboratory, we observed evidence that energy was being produced from the nuclear reaction. We asked many technical and non-technical questions of the scientists and the principal of the company. Some of us reviewed the literature and the papers written by the scientists who had worked on this technology over a 20-year period, published in referred scientific journals. An unusual feature of the presentations was that they were mostly technical scientific and little marketing or sales pitch. Attached are the names of those from GEC who made presentations or otherwise were present at formal and informal events.

    The following are salient points, conclusions and recommendations.

    Common features of nuclear reactor technologies

    • Nuclear reaction generates energy a million times more than that from chemical reactions (e.g. burning of coal and oil.)

    • It is for base load application operating 24/7 rather than intermittent like solar or wind.

    • Energy cost is much lower, $0.15 to $0.16 than that of a base load petroleum fired plant. $0.38 kilowatt hour or more, lower than other RE plants such as wind or solar.

    • Fuel change required every 50 years.

    Pro

    • The technology uses fertile Uranium 238 (plentiful in nature and in non-radioactive nuclear waste) and not the fissile Uranium 235 of conventional nuclear technology.

    • There can be no weaponization risk because Uranium 238 is used instead of enriched Uranium 235.

    • The fusion and fast fission nuclear reaction do not involve any chain reaction and so we can be stopped in a straight forward manner without danger of runaway core meltdown.

    • There are no dangerous or potentially dangerous waste products.

    • Cooling is done using helium instead of water (recall case of contaminated water at Fukushima)

    • The reactor plant is modular (e.g. 25 MW units) and foot print small unlike the large size (1,000 MW or more) conventional nuclear reactors.

    • Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates to ensure safety of all nuclear reactors.

    Con

    • We were unable to visit the prototype installation in Austin. Texas, as the permitting requirement for visitors would take a long time. As a result, we did not get to ask many more engineering type questions concerning the scale up process.

    • A working up-to-scale reactor producing electricity has not been built yet.

    Conclusions

    The Fusion and Fast Fusion technology is appropriate for base load on Saipan.

    The plant design and materials used are conventional ones but smaller scale than conventional nuclear reactor plants no exotic materials are required the usual construction techniques for power plants are required therefore there are no special requirements in design, engineering, construction and operation.

    Recommendation

    Sign a commitment letter to allow Global Energy Corporation to shop for financing for a 50 MW Plant. Estimated cost is $250,000,000.

    Next, negotiate a rate that is close to $0.15 kWh under a Build-Own-Operate Transfer procurement over a 20-year period.

    CUC can still continue with a 10 MW PV solar plants; the nuclear reactor kicks in at year 4 to 5 and the fuel surcharge, Levelized Energy Adjustment Claus in the rate is blend of technologies.

    Sincerely,

    REP. FRANCISCO S.

    DELA CRUZ

    UTU ABE MALAE

    WALLON YOUNG FONG

    2012 Global Energy Corporation news (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)


    “Virginia Firm Offers Nuclear Energy” Jun 2012 - Emmanuel T. Erediano

    http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/cnmi-news/local/46996-virginia-firm-offers-nuclear-energy.php

    Quote:

    “Lawrence P.G. Forsley, vice president for science and technology of Global Energy Corp. (globalenergycorporation.com), said their “revolutionary technology” is based on the “new science of hybrid fusion fast fission” green nuclear energy, or “Genie.”

    Forsley said he is among the GEC scientists who conducted 23 years of research and development with the U.S. Navy. He said they completed the design of a safe, clean, secure and affordable green hybrid fusion nuclear reactor for commercial uses.

    Genie reactors, he said, don’t use a uranium-235 chain reaction. Without a chain reaction, there can’t be a runaway, core meltdown, no explosions initiated by the meltdowns and no radioactive fallout, he added. Genie reactors, Forsley said, don’t have nuclear waste problems.

    It doesn’t need a spent fuel pool nor a spent fuel waste storage dump. It “burns” uranium-238 that comprises 95 percent of conventional nuclear waste. Therefore, Genie actually “cleans” nuclear waste, he added. - end quotes

    ALSO “Guam Eyes Clean Nuclear Power” http://www.mvariety.com/cnmi/c…-eyes-clean-nuclear-power

    Quote:

    “We’re generation five,” Dr. Khim (President of Global Energy Corp) told the Variety during an exclusive interview, “and first of all this is a brand new concept.” He said safety is the first consideration, and that cannot be ensured by building higher walls around reactors, as Japan saw last year with Fukushima.

    “You have to change the basic science of nuclear power,” Khim explained. “We’ve been working with the U.S. Navy for about 22 years and the basic science phase is now over. Now we’re going into commercial development, which the Navy is not going to do.” But Khim says the science has been repeatedly duplicated by the Navy, and has been proven, recognized and published.

    Officials of the Navy on Guam, including Capt. John V. Heckmann Jr., CO of Naval Facilities and a professional engineer, attended the GEC briefing. The GEC board of directors, Khim says, includes some well-known Washington D.C. Players, including former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, former Congressman and Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, and former U.S. Congressman Tom Davis, among others.” - end quotes


    (editor note) E-Cat’s Ferrara, Italy tests Dec. 2012 and Mar. 2013


    2013 Global Energy Corporation news (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)

    title "Impeached governor inked secret deal to construct fast breeder reactor" By Lucas W Hixson, March 25 http://enformable.com/2013/03/…uct-fast-breeder-reactor/

    Quote:

    Later that month, the press reported that Global Energy Corp. was proposing to build a 50-megawatt plant as a pilot project on Guam, on a build, operate and transfer basis for which GEC would obtain its own financing. The reports argued that Guam ratepayers would pay only for the electric power generated. GEC CEO Dr. Khim even said that he would finance the estimated $250 million plant himself. “No initial money for Guam at all,” Khim assured the press. “I’ll pay all the money; I’ll run it; and give Guam cheap electricity.” - end quote


    2013 Navy Patent (a 2009 patent continuation) “Excess enthalpy upon pressurization of dispersed palladium with hydrogen or deuterium” US9192918B2 Original Assignee: The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy - Inventors: David A. Kidwell - Filing date: Aug 8, 2013 -GRANT issued: Nov 24, 2015 editor note: see PRIORITY CLAIM) i.e. “All applications listed in this paragraph as well as all other publications and patent documents referred to throughout this nonprovisional application are incorporated herein by reference.” -end note https://www.google.com/patents/US9192918B2


    May 2013 NASA (publication) NASA/TM-2013-217981, L-20240, NF1676L-16305- “Advanced-to-Revolutionary Space Technology Options – The Responsibly Imaginable” Apr 1, 2013 Dennis M. Bushnell - See pg. 13, ‘Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, the Realism and the Outlook’ Quote: “- given the truly massive-to-mind boggling benefits – solutions to climate, energy and the limitations that restrict the NASA Mission areas, all of them. The key to space exploration is energetics. The key to supersonic transports and neighbor-friendly personal fly/drive air vehicles is energetics, as simplex examples of the potential implications of this area of research.” –end quotehttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20130011698


    2013 Boeing Patent (applied engineering) “Rotational annular airscrew with integrated acoustic arrester” CA2824290A1 Applicant: The Boeing Company, Matthew D. Moore, Kelly L. Boren - Filing date: Aug 16, 2013 - Publication date: May 12, 2014 - “ The contra-rotating forward coaxial electric motor and the contra-rotating aft coaxial electric motor are coupled to at least one energy source. The contra-rotating forward coaxial electric motor and the contra-rotating aft coaxial electric motor may be directly coupled to the at least one energy source, or through various control and/or power distribution circuits. The energy source may comprise, for example, a system to convert chemical, solar or nuclear energy into electricity within or coupled to a volume bearing structure. The energy source may comprise, for example but without limitation, a battery, a fuel cell, a solar cell, an energy harvesting device, low energy nuclear reactor (LENR), a hybrid propulsion system, or other energy source.https://www.google.com/patents/CA2824290A1


    (editor note) E-Cat’s Oct. 2014 32 day test in Lugano, Switzerland


    2014 Global Energy Corporation Newscasts (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)

    GEC Newscast 1 - New Energy Source

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newcast 2 - US Patent

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newscast 3 - Safety

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newcast 4 - Nuclear Waste

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newscast 5 - Security

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newcast 6 Genie22 - Hybrid Reactor

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newscast 7 National Economics

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newscast 8 Saudi Plan

    GEC Newscast 8 Saudi Plan
    How can Saudi Arabia maintain export revenue after oil?
    www.youtube.com

    GEC Newscast 9 Korea Plan

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Newscast 10 Genie22 Business Economics

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    GEC Thorium SMR editor note-(SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    Global Energy Corporation YouTube Channel

    GlobalEnergyCorp
    www.youtube.com


    2014 NASA and Cal Tech LENR energy publication (applied engineering )“Impact of Advanced Energy Technologies on Aircraft Design” Authors: Roger Lepsch - NASA Langley Research Center, Matt Fischer - National Institute of Aerospace, Christopher Jones - National Institute of Aerospace, Alan Wilhite - National Institute of Aerospace; 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech, (AIAA 2014-0538) Jan 17, 2014. Quote: “The impact of low energy nuclear reaction (LENR) technology on the design of aircraft is examined. Energy conversion possibilities considered and a Brayton cycle engine with aLENR heat exchanger is selected. Potential aerospace applications of LENRdevices are discussed and a high altitude (HALE) unmanned aeriel vehicle with multi-year endurance is conceptualized with primary focus on energy management.” -end quote. http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2014-0538

    Slide show: https://nari.arc.nasa.gov/site…t/files/SeedlingWELLS.pdf


    2014 NASA and Georgia Institute of Technology (applied engineering) “The Application of LENR to Synergistic Mission Capabilities” Presented at AIAA AVIATION 2014 Atlanta, GA USA, Douglas P. Wells NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Dimitri N. Mavris Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia Pg. 2 (energetics) LENR - 8,000,000 times chemical, Fusion - 7,300,000 times chemical, Fission -1,900,000 times chemical.

    The Application of LENR to Synergistic Mission Capabilities - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)


    2014 NASA and Cal Tech Presentation (applied engineering) “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Aircraft” NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) 2014 Seedling Technical Seminar, February 19–27, 2014.

    California Polytechnic State University • Dr. Rob McDonald • Advanced Topics in Aircraft Design course (10wks) • Sponsored Research Project Team

    NASA Glenn Research Center • Jim Felder, Chris Snyder

    NASA Langley Research Center • Bill Fredericks, Roger Lepsch, John Martin, Mark Moore, Doug Wells, Joe Zawodny

    https://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/SeedlingWELLS.pdf


    2014 NASA Cal Poly (applied engineering) 2013 ARMD Seedling Fund Phase I Project. NASA/TM–2014-218283 June 2014 "This report serves as the final written documentation for the Aeronautic Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) Seedling Fund’s Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) Aircraft Phase I project. The findings presented include propulsion system concepts, synergistic missions, and aircraft concepts." Authors: Douglas P. Wells Langley Research Center; Robert McDonald, Robbie Campbell, Adam Chase, Jason Daniel, Michael Darling, Clayton Green, Collin MacGregor, Peter Sudak, Harrison Sykes, and Michael Waddington California Polytechnic State University; William J. Fredericks, Roger A. Lepsch, John G. Martin, Mark D. Moore, and Joseph M. Zawodny Langley Research Center; James L. Felder and Christopher A. Snyder Glenn Research Center https://mdao.grc.nasa.gov/publ…NR-Seedling_WellsLaRC.pdf


    2014 NASA (presentation) “Frontier Aerospace Opportunities”

    NASA/TM-2014-218519, L-20449, NF1676L-19426

    Dennis M. Bushnell Oct. 2014 LENR (pages) 11, 13, 21, 24, 25, and 26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/….nasa.gov/20150001248.pdf


    2015 September Dr. DeChiaro - Branch Q51 NSWC Dahlgren (presentation)IEEE Date: 23 September 2015 Presented by Dr. Louis F. DeChiaro - NSWC Dahlgren and Professor Peter Hagelstein - MIT editor note- This DeChiaro Bio.

    Quote: “He joined the US Navy as a civilian Physicist in September, 2006 and since 2009 been performing investigations in LENR physics and supporting the EMC efforts of Branch Q51 at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA. During the period 2010-2012 he was on special assignment at the Naval Research Labs, Washington, D.C. in their experimental LENR group. Dr. DeChiaro is a member of Tau Beta Pi.” - end quote -end note

    Bios for these speakers are found at: https://meetings.vtools.ieee.org/m/35303

    IEEE presentation title: “Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Phenomena and Potential Applications” http://fuelrfuture.com/science/navylenr.pdf


    2016 - May 4th, U.S. House Committee on Armed Services (LENR inquire)

    Quote “The committee is aware of recent positive developments in developinglow energy nuclear reactions (LENR), which produce ultra clean, low cost renewable energy that have strong national security implications.

    ...the committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide a briefing on the military utility of recent U.S. industrial base LENR advancements to the House Committee on Armed Services by September 22, 2016.

    See -Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) Briefing; “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017" page 87.

    https://www.congress.gov/114/crpt/hrpt537/CRPT-114hrpt537.pdf


    2016 SPAWAR, U. of New Mexico U. of Austin GEC JWK (publication)

    Defense Threat Reduction Agency “DTRA: INVESTIGATION OF NANO-NUCLEAR REACTIONS IN CONDENSED MATTER FINAL REPORT” June 2016 Affiliation: US Navy SPAWAR-PAC, Global Energy Corporation, University of New Mexico, University of Austin Dr. Pamela A. Mosier-Boss SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific San Diego, CA 92152 Mr. Lawrence P.G. Forsley JWK International 7617 Little River Turnpike Suite 1000 Annandale, VA 22003 Dr. Patrick K. McDaniel University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MosierBossinvestigat.pdf Also at:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307594560_DTRA_INVESTIGATION_OF_NANO-NUCLEAR_REACTIONS_IN_CONDENSED_MATTER_FINAL_REPORT


    2016 NASA Patent “Methods and apparatus for enhanced nuclear reactions” US20170263337A1 Inventors: Vladimir Pines, Marianna Pines, Bruce Steinetz, Arnon Chait, Gustave Fralick, Robert Hendricks, Paul Westmeyer - Current Assignee: NASA Glenn Research Center, Pinesci Consulting - Priority date: 2016-03-09, Application: 2017-09-14.

    editor note- US20170263337A1 claims that many types of materials are suitable for LENR. - end note

    Quote:

    [0082] It should be understood that any material which may be hydrided may be used as the initial material, such as, for example, single-walled or double-walled carbon nanotubes. Double-walled carbon nanotubes in particular have an internal spacing consistent with the lattice spacing of palladium-silver lattices, the usage of which in experiment will be described in detail below.

    Alternatively, materials such as silicon, graphene, boron nitride, silicene, molybdenum disulfide or ferritin may be used, although it should be understood that substantially two-dimensional structures, such as graphene, boron nitride, silicene and molybdenum disulfide are not hydrated similar to their three-dimensional counterparts and may be subjected to a separate process, specifically with the two-dimensional structure being positioned adjacent one of the above materials, as will be described in greater detail below.

    Similarly, ferritin and other complex materials may be filled or loaded with hydrogen using methods specific to the particular material properties. In general, the initial material may be any suitable material which is able to readily absorb and or adsorb hydrogen isotopes, such as, for example, metal hydrides (e.g., titanium, scandium, vanadium, chromium, yttrium, niobium, zirconium, palladium, hafnium, tantalum, etc.), lanthanides (e.g., lanthanum, cesium, etc.), actinides (e.g., actinium, thallium, uranium, etc.), ionic hydrides (e.g., lithium, strontium, etc.), covalent hydrides (e.g., gallium, germanium, bismuth, etc.), intermediate hydrides (e.g., beryllium, magnesium, etc.), and select metals known to be active (e.g., nickel, tungsten, rhenium, molybdenum, ruthenium, rhodium, etc.), along with hydrides thereof, as well as alloys with non-hydriding materials (e.g., silver, copper, etc.), suspensions, and combinations thereof. - end quote

    US20170263337A1 - Methods and apparatus for enhanced nuclear reactions - Google Patents

    (editor note) The patent US20170263337A1 is a LENR patent by a NASA team. This patent’s citations include two patents “Method and apparatus for generating thermal energy” and “Methods of generating energetic particles using nanotubes and articles thereof” which have a classification: G21B3/00 Low temperature nuclear fusion reactors, e.g. alleged cold fusion reactors. Also note the following Glenn Research Center Publication, “Investigation of Deuterium Loaded Materials Subject to X-Ray Exposure” Apr 3, 2017, where US20170263337A1 inventors work with Lawrence P. Forsley of Global Energy Corporation (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech). - end note


    2016 NASA Glenn Research Center (LENR tech licensing offer)

    editor note- A search for ‘fusion’ that I did in May of 2016, at the NASA Technology Gateway, yielded this out of Glenn Research Center... “Methods and Apparatus for Enhanced Nuclear Reactions” Reference Number LEW-19366-1. Contact us for information about this technology. NASA Glenn Research Center, Innovation Projects Office [email protected] -end note

    Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam

    https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1704/1704.00694.pdf

    By Bruce M. Steinetz and Theresa L. Benyo National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135

    Vladimir Pines and Marianna Pines PineSci Consulting Avon Lake, Ohio 44012

    Lawrence P. Forsley JWK Corporation Annandale, Virginia 22003

    Paul A. Westmeyer National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546

    Arnon Chait National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135

    Michael D. Becks Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, Ohio 44142

    Richard E. Martin Cleveland State University Cleveland, Ohio 44115

    Robert C. Hendricks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135

    Nicholas Penney Ohio Aerospace Institute Brook Park, Ohio 44142

    Annette M. Marsolais and Tracy R. Kamm Vantage Partners, LLC Brook Park, Ohio 44142


    (editor note) E-Cat QX demo held November, 2017 in Stockholm, Sweden.


    2017 Global Energy Corporation LENR Update (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech)

    Quote:

    Our team of scientists and consultants have solid backgrounds in both technology and business for the development of energy technology. With GEC you get the benefit of experience that’s been acquired year after year, job after job.

    While development of NanoStar and Nanomite is ongoing, GEC initial focus is the product development and commercialization of Small Modular Generators (SMG’s) using Hybrid Fusion technology. GEC is currently negotiating several new SMG construction contracts ranging from 250MWe to 5GWe around the world.

    After 20 years of R&D and product development, GEC has developed a truly safe, clean and secure atomic energy generator through hybrid fusion-fast-fission Technology. These SMG’s are safe (no chain reaction-no melt down), clean (uses nuclear waste/unenriched U as fuel), and secure (no enrichment and no reprocessing).

    2006 - Global Energy Corporation founded

    2011 - Subsidiary GEC Global LLC established for development of conventional power plants

    2012 - BOT signed to develop and build a 50MWe GEC SMG Power Plant on the island of Saipan

    2013 - Patent issued for Technology - end quotes

    http://www.gec.solutions

    (editor note) GEC holds the 2008 Patent (SPAWAR JWK LENR tech) “A hybrid fusion fast fission reactor” WO2009108331A2; which is the sister patent of the 2007 SPAWAR patent “System and method for generating particles” US8419919B1 which was granted Apr. 16, 2013; assigned to JWK International Corporation and The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy. -end note


    Entities of Interest from

    U. S. Government LENR Energy 2018 Review

    Douglas P. Wells Langley Research Cente; Robert McDonald, Robbie Campbell, Adam Chase, Jason Daniel, Michael Darling, Clayton Green, Collin MacGregor, Peter Sudak, Harrison Sykes, and Michael Waddington California Polytechnic State University; William J. Fredericks, Roger A. Lepsch, John G. Martin, Mark D. Moore, and Joseph M. Zawodny Langley Research Center; James L. Felder and Christopher A. Snyder Glenn Research Center

    Inventors, Authors and other Persons of Interest

    Brian S. Ahern https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Brian+S.+Ahern

    Beverly Barnhart, DIA/DI, Defense Warning Office - 2013 New Energy Times article, "Intelligence Analyst Gripes to New Energy Times About Publishing Leak" Published on Apr 4, 2013 by Steven Krivit

    http://news.newenergytimes.net…es-about-publishing-leak/.

    Michael D. Becks https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170002544

    Theresa L. Benyo - Theresa Benyo currently works at the Structures and Materials Division, NASA. Theresa does research in Plasma Physics, Electromagnetism and Nuclear Physics. Their most recent publication is ‘Experimental Observations of Nuclear Activity in Deuterated Materials Subjected to a Low-Energy Photon Beam.’https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Theresa_Benyo

    Marty K. Bradley https://aviation.aiaa.org/uplo…Program/Bradley%20Bio.pdf

    Kelly L. Boren https://www.google.com/search?…ntor:%22Kelly+L.+Boren%22

    Pamela A. Boss https://www.google.com/search?…ntor:%22Pamela+A.+Boss%22

    Also: Proposed Satellite Meeting to the 43rd EPSMeeting on Plasma Physics on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions ... July 2016

    Biography: Dr. Pamela Mosier-Boss is a retired scientist from a Navy laboratory in San Diego, CA.


    She is an analytical chemist who has investigated the electrochemistry of thionyl chloride using spectroelectrochemical techniques first demonstrated by Fleischmann and Pons.


    She has explored the use of phage for bacterial detection and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for the detection of chemical contaminants such as perchlorate, hexavalent chromium, chlorinated solvents, and bacteria.


    SERS is another phenomenon that was first discovered by Fleischmann.


    Mosier-Boss has also been involved in the development of direct push sensors to map out subsurface plumes of heavy metals and petroleum.

    In addition to her environmental sensor work at the Navy laboratory, she has conducted research in the area of low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) for the past 26 years. She is currently conducting LENR research with GEC. In this research, she and her colleagues have employed the co-deposition process that was pioneered by Dr. Stanislaw Szpak. In the co-deposition process, palladium is electroplated onto a metal substrate in the presence of evolving deuterium gas. The resultant palladium nanoparticles load instantly with deuterium achieving the high D/Pd loadings and high deuterium flux inside the lattice to initiate LENR. Using the co-deposition process, Mosier-Boss and her colleagues have reported on the evidence of excess heat, tritium, X-ray/gamma-ray emissions, transmutation, charged particles, and neutrons. These results have been published in over 30 peer-reviewed journal articles. note Due to few registrations, this meeting has been canceled. https://kuleuvencongres.be/eps…program/satellite_meeting

    Frank Carlucci https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Carlucci

    Arnon Chait - Arnon Chait, Ph.D. - Head of Med-Tech

    Arnon Chait is the co-founder of both ANALIZA, Inc. and Cleveland Diagnostics, and is the President and CEO at AnalizaDx, LLC and Cleveland Diagnostics, Inc. Dr. Chait`s training and experience covers physics, engineering and biosciences, concentrating on interdisciplinary research for over two decades. Dr. Chait was the founder of an advanced interdisciplinary lab at NASA, and has held several academic positions at leading universities, including Tufts and Case Western Reserve University. He has extensively published in multiple fields, and is the holder of over a dozen of patents and multiple international patent applications. Arnon has been the co-founder of two additional companies in the fields of structural genomics (IP sold to Fluidigm) and opto-electronics. http://www.kitalholdings.com/h…9&did=2241&G=8899&SM=8907 Also see: Dr Arnon Chait, CEO of Cleveland Diagnostics CDx - Also: Arnon Chait NASA on YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVe117kQaP4

    Harry R. Clark Jr. https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Harry+R.+Clark%2c+Jr.

    Christopher C. Daniels https://www.uakron.edu/engineering/research/profile.dot?u=cdaniels Also: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher_Daniels5

    Tom Davis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…vis_(Virginia_politician)

    Dr. Louis F. DeChiaro (see bio speakers) https://meetings.vtools.ieee.org/m/35303

    Christopher K. Droney - Configuration Synthesis Manager. Boeing, News article “SUGAR sweetens the deal with Phase 3 results, Phase 4 underway” by Christopher Droney http://www.boeing.com/features…ture-technical-sugar.page

    Albert Epshteyn https://www.google.com/search?…tor:%22Albert+Epshteyn%22

    Matt Fischer - NIA Graduate (see year 2012) University/Date: Georgia Tech/May 2012 Degree/Advisor: M.S., Aerospace Engineering, Dr. Alan Wilhite. Present Position: Boeing, Alabama - Thesis Topic: “Magnetohydrodynamic Acceleration of a Thermal Air Rocket Utilizing Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” https://www.researchgate.net/p…_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions

    Gustave Fralick https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Gustave+Fralick

    Lawrence Parker Galloway Forsley https://www.google.com/search?…arker+Galloway+Forsley%22 also https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lawrence_Forsley2

    Frank E. Gordon https://www.google.com/search?…tor:%22Frank+E.+Gordon%22

    Prof. Peter Hagelstein - MIT https://www.researchgate.net/s…103481_Peter_L_Hagelstein Also see bio - speakers:https://meetings.vtools.ieee.org/m/35303

    Capt. John V. Heckmann Jr. (editors note) This news, “Lynch to Move on to NAVFAC Pacific; Heckmann to Assume Command of NAVFAC Marianas” - By Pacific News Center - July 14, 2011 Quote “An official change of Command Ceremony is slated for next Wednesday at 10 am at the Big Screen Theater on Naval Base Guam. At that “time-honored Navy tradition” Captain Lynch will render his command to the new NAVFAC Marianas Commander, Captain John V. Heckmann Jr. Heckmann is coming to Guam from Norfolk, Virginia where he served as the executive officer for NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic.” - end quote

    Robert C. Hendricks https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Robert+Hendricks

    Keith H. Johnson - MIT https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Keith+H.+Johnson Also: MIT News, Scientist/Screenwriter, Professor Leads Double Life March 11, 1992. http://news.mit.edu/1992/doublelife-0311Also this from 2012,

    Cold Fusion Returns to MIT, by Eugene Mallove http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue47/mit.html Also:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Keith_Johnson8

    Christopher A. Jones - NASA Langley Research Center https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2017-5284 Also: Sponsor, Non-Voting Member of RASC-AL; The Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts – Academic Linkages (RASC-AL) is managed by the National Institute of Aerospace on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Bio: Dr. Christopher Jones works in the Space Mission Analysis Branch at NASA’s Langley Research Center in Hampton, VA. His current work includes strategic analysis of space technology investments, applications of in-space assembly to Mars exploration, and mission design for an Earth Science satellite. His previous work includes leading development of a Venus atmospheric exploration concept, performing trajectory analysis in support of future NASA missions, and modeling in-situ resource utilization architectures for the Moon and Mars. He obtained his Masters and Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2016, respectively, and his Bachelors in mechanical engineering from the University of South Carolina in 2007. http://rascal.nianet.org/steering-committee/

    Tracy R. Kamm https://arxiv.org/find/nucl-ex/1/au:+Kamm_T/0/1/0/all/0/1

    Jay Wook Khim https://www.google.com/search?…entor:%22Jay+Wook+Khim%22

    David A. Kidwell https://www.google.com/search?…or:%22David+A.+Kidwell%22

    Roger Lepsch - Aerospace Technologist, Vehicle Analysis Branch, Systems Analysis and Concepts Directorate, NASA Langley. https://www.researchgate.net/s…s/2058682370_Roger_Lepsch

    Richard E. Martin http://www.csuohio.edu/engineering/mce/faculty-and-staff-5 Also: https://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Martin_R/0/1/0/all/0/1

    Dimitri N. Mavris - Regents Professor, Boeing Professor of Advanced Aerospace Systems Analysis, & Langley Distinguished Professor in Advanced Aerospace Systems Architecture https://www.ae.gatech.edu/people/dimitri-mavris Also FAA ASCENT CLEEN Project 36 flight design leader Dimitri N. Mavris who co-authored the 2014 NASA paper ‘The Application of LENR to Synergistic Mission Capabilities’.https://gbgoble.kinja.com/lenr…radioactive-nu-1765958500

    Matthew D. Moore https://www.google.com/search?…or:%22Matthew+D.+Moore%22

    Norman Mineta https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta

    Nicholas Penney https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nicholas_Penney2

    Marianna Pines https://www.researchgate.net/s…ations?q=marianna%2Bpines

    Vladimir Pines https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vladimir_Pines

    Bruce M. Steinetz https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Bruce+Steinetz

    Stanislaw Szpak https://www.google.com/search?…tor:%22Stanislaw+Szpak%22

    Douglas P. Wells - Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Aircraft Investigator NASA Langley Research Center https://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/17WELLS_ABSTRACT.pdf

    Paul Westmeyer https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Paul+Westmeyer

    Alan Wilhite - News title “AE salutes Prof. Alan Wilhite” Dec. 10, 2014" The faculty and staff of the School of Aerospace Engineering gave a spirited send-off to Dr. Alan Wilhite who officially retired from his positions at Georgia Tech and NASA. https://www.ae.gatech.edu/news…salutes-prof-alan-wilhite

    Pharis Edward Williams https://www.google.com/search?…Pharis+Edward+Williams%22

    Joseph M. Zawodny https://www.google.com/search?…r:%22Joseph+M.+Zawodny%22 Also: "Clean Nuclear Power Potential Tantalizes Aerospace: Will the promise of low-energy nuclear-reaction technology overcome the challenges?" Oct 24, 2011, by Joseph Zawodny - Aviation Week & Space Technology http://aviationweek.com/awin/c…tial-tantalizes-aerospace

    also... the SUGAR team

    Boeing

    Marty Bradley, Christopher Droney, Zachary Hoisington, Timothy Allen, Dwaine Cotes, Yueping Guo, Brian Foist, Blaine Rawdon, Sean Wakayama, Emily Dallara, Ed Kowalski, Joe Wa, Ismail Robbana, Sergey Barmichev, Larry Fink, Mithra Sankrithi, Edward White

    General Electric

    Kurt Murrow, Jeff Hammel, Srini Gowda

    Georgia Tech

    Michelle Kirby, Hongjun Ran, Teawoo Nam, Jimmy Tai, Chris Perullo

    Vermont Tech

    Joe Schetz, Rakesh Kapania

    NASA

    Mark Guynn, Erik Olson, Gerald Brown, Larry Leavitt, Richard Wahls, Doug Wells, James Felder, Casey Burley, John Martin

    Federal Aviation Administration

    Rhett Jeffries, Christopher Sequiera

    Companies of Interest

    PineSci Consulting http://government-contractors.…172920/Pinesci-Consulting

    Ohio Aerospace Institute - The Ohio Aerospace Institute (OAI) is a non-profit organization that enhances the aerospace competitiveness of its corporate, federal agency, non-profit and university members through research and technology development, workforce preparedness and engagement with networks for innovation. www.oai.org/

    Vantage Partners, LLC - Vantage Partners, LLC provides aero-engineering and information technology solutions. Its engineering solutions include electrical, mechanical, software, and systems. The company was incorporated in 2008 and is based in Lanham, Maryland. Vantage Partners, LLC operates as a joint venture between Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies, Inc. and Vantage Systems, Inc.https://vantagepartners.com/

    JWK International Corporation http://www.jwk.com/site/

    Global Energy Corporation http://www.gec.solutions

    Hydroelectron Ventures Inc

    Spaceworks Enterprises Inc. http://spaceworkseng.com/

    National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) http://www.nianet.org

    Boeing http://www.boeing.com/

    General Electric https://www.ge.com/

    American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) https://www.aiaa.org/

    IEEE https://meetings.vtools.ieee.org/m/35303

    Universities of Interest

    The University of Akron

    Cleveland State University

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://web.mit.edu/

    Georgia Tech (Georgia Institute of Technology) http://www.gatech.edu/

    Vermont Technical College https://www.vtc.edu/

    Cal Poly San Luis Obispo - California State University

    Cal Poly San Luis Obispo | CSU
    www2.calstate.edu

    University of Alabama https://www.ua.edu/

    U.S. Agencies and Labs of Interest

    United States Department of Defense (DoD) https://www.defense.gov

    Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) https://www.darpa.mil/

    Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Energetics Center Indian Head http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Indian-Head-EOD-Technology/Who-We-Are/

    Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD) http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Dahlgren/

    Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Divisionhttp://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Warfare-Centers/NSWC-Indian-Head-EOD-Technology/

    NASA Langley Research Center https://www.nasa.gov/langley

    Federal Aviation Administration https://www.faa.gov/

    NASA Glenn Research Center -editor note- A search for ‘fusion’ out of the NASA Technology Gateway yields this out of Glenn Research Center... “Methods and Apparatus for Enhanced Nuclear Reactions” Reference Number LEW-19366-1 Contact us for information about this technology NASA Glenn Research Center Innovation Projects Office [email protected] -end notehttps://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/home/index.html

    Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR)www.public.navy.mil/spawar

    investigate and research

    2015 NASA CSU JWK PineSci Vantage Partners OAI; UofAkron (publication) “Investigation of Deuterium Loaded Materials Subject to X-Ray Exposure” Authors: Theresa L. Benyo, Bruce M. Steinetz, Robert C. Hendricks (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center), Richard E. Martin (Cleveland State University), Lawrence P. Forsley (JWK Corporation), Christopher C. Daniels (The University of Akron), Arnon Chait (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center), Vladimir Pines, Marianna Pines (PineSci Consulting), Nicholas Penney (Ohio Aerospace Institute), Tracy R. Kamm, Michael D. Becks (Vantage Partners, LLC)

    Comments: Created as work for NASA

    Report number: NASA/TM--2015-218491/REV1

    editor note- report year 2015 - arxiv submission date 3 Apr 2017

    Investigation of Deuterium Loaded Materials Subject to X-Ray Exposure
    Results are presented from an exploratory study involving x-ray irradiation of select deuterated materials. Titanium deuteride (TiD2) plus deuterated…
    arxiv.org

    2016 NASA "Independent Experimentation on the Activation of Deuterium-Loaded Materials by X-Ray Exposure" Rob Davies - Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91105 - April 13, 2016 - California Institute of Technology. U.S. Government sponsorship acknowledged. The research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    NASA/TM-2015-218491

    New Energy Times

    Kirk Shanahan is a physical chemist employed by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Savannah River National Laboratory. As this Freedom of Information Act request response shows, he spends a large amount of time attempting to discredit low-energy nuclear reaction research claims. http://news.newenergytimes.net…han-can-you-explain-this/

    Also see: Responsive document 25

    http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/Shanahan-Mitsubishi-FOIA-00929-00952-W.pdf

    DoD and DoE Savannah River Site https://www.dnfsb.gov/doe-sites/savannah-river-site

    Also see: https://www.dnfsb.gov/sites/de…wenty%20Year%20Report.pdf

    "A new look at low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research: a response to Shanahan" J. Marwan* Dr. Marwan Chemie, Rudower Chaussee 29, 12489 Berlin, Germany - M.C.H. McKubre and F.L. Tanzella SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA - P.L. Hagelstein MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, MA USA - M. H. Miles Dixie State College, St. George, UT 84770 U.S.A. - M.R. Swartz JET Energy Inc. Wellesley, MA 02481 (USA) - Edmund Storms KivaLabs, Santa Fe, NM - Y. Iwamura Advanced Technology Research Center, Mitsibishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., 1-8-1, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-8515 Japan P.A. - Mosier-Boss SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific, Code 71730, San Diego, CA 92152 USA = L.P.G. Forsley JWK International Corp., Annandale, VA 22003 USA

    A new look at low-energy nuclear reaction (LENR) research: a response to Shanahan
    In his criticisms of the review article on LENR by Krivit and Marwan, Shanahan has raised a number of issues in the areas of calorimetry, heat after death,…
    pubs.rsc.org

    2016 March 19 article by Greg Goble

    title "LENR NRNF Low Energy Nuclear Reaction NonRadioactive Nuclear Flight US and EU Applied Engineering" https://gbgoble.kinja.com/lenr…radioactive-nu-1765958500

    Patents by Inventor Paul Westmeyer

    Paul Westmeyer has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

    METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED NUCLEAR REACTIONS

    Publication number: 20170263337

    Abstract: Nuclear fusion processes with enhanced rates may be realized by providing energetic electrons in an environment containing a suitable fuel gas, a liquid fuel source, a solid fuel source, a plasma fuel source, or any combination thereof. The fuel source may be deuterium, tritium, a combination thereof, or any fuel source capable of creating deeply screened and/or neutral nuclei when exposed to energetic electrons. Under proper conditions, at least some of the deeply screened and/or neutral nuclei fuse with other nuclei. Neutral versions of deuteron and/or triton nuclei may be created by bringing neutrons with certain energy levels (e.g., around 3 MeV, but optionally less or much less than 3 MeV) into interaction with other neutrons, forming neutral versions of deuterons and/or tritons. Such processes may be used for power generation, heat production, nuclear waste remediation, material creation, and/or medical isotope production, for example.

    Type: Application

    Filed: March 9, 2016

    Publication date: September 14, 2017

    Applicants: PineSci Consulting, NASA Glenn Research Center

    Inventors: Vladimir Pines, Marianna Pines, Bruce Steinetz, Arnon Chait, Gustave Fralick, Robert Hendricks, Paul Westmeyer

    System and method for detecting unauthorized device access by comparing multiple independent spatial-time data sets from other devices

    Patent number: 9749342

    Abstract: An authentication procedure utilizes multiple independent sources of data to determine whether usage of a device, such as a desktop computer, is authorized. When a comparison indicates an anomaly from the base-line usage data, the system, provides a notice that access of the first device is not authorized.

    Type: Grant

    Filed: September 30, 2016

    Date of Patent: August 29, 2017

    Assignee: The United States of America, as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

    Inventors: Frederick J. Krage, Paul A. Westmeyer, Russell F. Wertenberg, Jack F. Riegel

    ACCELERATION AND PRECISION CONTROLLED EJECTION OF MASS

    Publication number: 20170232578

    Abstract: Rotational motion generates velocity of a mass wherein the mass' release from the rotating system, becoming a projectile, and subsequent impact can result in cutting, abrasion, mixing of chemicals, coaling, and other surface and bulk volume effects including the transfer of momentum. Structures and devices are used to insert a mass into a rotating device. While inside the rotating device the mass gains velocity. Transitioning from the rotational system to a stationary surface is accomplished with a minimum of velocity loss by selecting trajectories, air flows, and surface finishes to reduce energy losses in the mass' transition onto the stationary surface and info a fixed stationary guide tube, and ultimately to an impact point. Single and multiple conduits, stationary and rotating, can be used to accomplish complex chemistry and physics affects.

    Type: Application

    Filed: February 13, 2017

    Publication date: August 17, 2017

    Inventors: Paul Westmeyer, Robert Edwin Woods, III, Robert Parker Woods

    Acceleration of a mass by a structure under central or gyration induced forces

    Patent number: 8820303

    Abstract: Gyration induced acceleration of a mass is modified by inserting changes in the pathway of a mass under the influence of gyration force resulting in an acceleration to re-phase after the phase disruption.

    Type: Grant

    Filed: September 11, 2012

    Date of Patent: September 2, 2014

    Inventors: Paul Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Acceleration Of A Mass By A Structure Under Central Or Gyration Induced Forces

    Publication number: 20130104864

    Abstract: Gyration induced acceleration of a mass is modified by inserting changes in the pathway of a mass under the influence of gyration force resulting in an acceleration to re-phase after the phase disruption.

    Type: Application

    Filed: September 11, 2012

    Publication date: May 2, 2013

    Inventors: Paul Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Method and apparatus for moving a mass

    Publication number: 20090314270

    Abstract: A combination for performing a variety of functions includes (a) apparatus for moving a projectile or other mass along an arcuate path and moving the path substantially radially along a local radius of curvature and (b) a tool, vehicle or other article for receiving such projectile and being moved thereby.

    Type: Application

    Filed: February 3, 2009

    Publication date: December 24, 2009

    Inventors: Paul A. Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Method and apparatus for moving a mass

    Patent number: 7500477

    Abstract: A combination for performing a variety of functions includes (a) apparatus for moving a projectile or other mass along an arcuate path and moving the path substantially radially along a local radius of curvature and (b) a tool, vehicle or other article for receiving such projectile and being moved thereby.

    Type: Grant

    Filed: June 20, 2005

    Date of Patent: March 10, 2009

    Inventors: Paul A. Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Method and apparatus for moving a mass

    Patent number: 7013988

    Abstract: A combination for performing a variety of functions includes (a) apparatus for moving a projectile or other mass along an arcuate path and moving the path substantially radially along a local radius of curvature and (b) a tool, vehicle or other article for receiving such projectile and being moved thereby.

    Type: Grant

    Filed: May 20, 2003

    Date of Patent: March 21, 2006

    Inventors: Paul A. Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Method and apparatus for moving a mass

    Publication number: 20050249576

    Abstract: A combination for performing a variety of functions includes (a) apparatus for moving a projectile or other mass along an arcuate path and moving the path substantially radially along a local radius of curvature and (b) a tool, vehicle or other article for receiving such projectile and being moved thereby.

    Type: Application

    Filed: June 20, 2005

    Publication date: November 10, 2005

    Inventors: Paul Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Method and apparatus for moving a mass

    Publication number: 20030221867

    Abstract: A combination for performing a variety of functions includes (a) apparatus for moving a projectile or other mass along an arcuate path and moving the path substantially radially along a local radius of curvature and (b) a tool, vehicle or other article for receiving such projectile and being moved thereby.

    Type: Application

    Filed: May 20, 2003

    Publication date: December 4, 2003

    Inventors: Paul A. Westmeyer, Renee Mazaheri

    Microwave energy generation device used to facilitate removal of concrete from a metal container

    Patent number: 5481092

    Abstract: An apparatus for mixing concrete adapted to facilitate removal of hardened concrete therefrom includes a metal container and a microwave energy generation device. The metal container is adapted to contain concrete and to enable concrete placed therein to be mixed or agitated, the container having inner walls to which the concrete may adhere when the concrete hardens. The microwave energy generation device generates microwave radiation energy into the metal container and is capable of liberating water molecules from the concrete placed in the container so as to weaken the chemical structure of the concrete to thereby facilitate breakage of the hardened concrete and removal of the concrete from the container.

    Type: Grant

    Filed: December 2, 1994

    Date of Patent: January 2, 1996

    Inventor: Paul A. Westmeyer

  • “The current findings open a new path for initiating fusion reactions for further study within the scientific community. However, the reaction rates need to be increased substantially to achieve appreciable power levels, which may be possible utilizing various reaction multiplication methods under consideration,” said Glenn’s Bruce Steinetz, Ph.D., the NASA project principal investigator... 'IEEE Spectrum article 05 Aug 2020 Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion


    Ed note: It's been recommended that I suggest you review these first. The latest development from GEC, one of the lead LCF partners at NASA.


    Journalist Study Slides (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml)

    Slideshow A - The unique GEC electric vehicle (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml) https://drive.google.com/file/…anKzF-8jCflYBiRLpE-y/view

    Slideshow B - GEC Reactor - Thorium as main fuel source (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml) https://drive.google.com/file/…_02yzjg-D3T1cAkdO2N7/view

    Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF)

    Website (at NASA)

    Videos

    'The GRC Team’s LCF Journey'

    'Nuclear Fusion Reactions in Deuterated Metals'

    Publications

    'NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion'

    'Novel Nuclear Reactions Observed in Bremsstrahlung-Irradiated Deuterated Metals' NASA/TP-20205001616

    'Nuclear Fusion Reactions in Deuterated Metals' NASA/TP-20205001617

    IEEE Spectrum article 05 Aug 2020

    "Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion"

    Michael Koziol '- nuclear fusion tokamak not included -' (note that it's in the URL)

    Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice Confinement Fusion
    NASA researchers demonstrate the ability to fuse atoms inside room-temperature metals
    spectrum.ieee.org

    Its' google snippet is interesting as well:

    • "NASA researchers demonstrate the ability to fuse atoms inside room-temperature metals. ... In fact, all they needed was a bit of metal, some hydrogen, and an electron accelerator. The team believes that their method, called lattice confinement fusion, could be a potential new power source for deep space missions. Aug 5, 2020"

    Further References

    “DTRA: Investigation of Nano-Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter Final Report” June 2016 Affiliation: US Navy SPAWAR-PAC, Global Energy Corporation, University of New Mexico, University of Austin

    From Table 5-2. (page 88) List of presentations to admirals and heads of government agencies.

    Date / Meeting Place / Person(s) Briefed

    • Aug. 2, 2006 NDIA Naval S&T Partnership Conference in Washington DC: RADM William E. Landay III (head of ONR), Dr. Mike McGrath (head of S&T at ASN, RDA), Lt. Gen. Lawrence P. Farrell Jr. (USAF, retired)
    • Sept. 28, 2006 Capt. S. Black (Navy Liaison to the Vice President) in the Vice Presidents’ ceremonial office in the old executive office building in Washington DC.
    • May 2007 NDIA Joint Services Environmental Management Conference in Columbus, OH: Len Gollobin (Head of NDIA Energy Security Panel), Jim Woolsey (former head of CIA)
    • Nov. 7, 2007 SSC-Pacific: RADM Charles (Grunt) Smith (Vice CDR of SPAWAR)
    • May 2008 SSC-Pacific: James Colvard (retired SES, on special assignment to the Secretary of the Navy)
    • Apr. 2009 SSC-Pacific: ADM James Hogg (four star admiral, retired)
    • Apr. 14, 2009 SSC-Pacific: Brief given to congressional staffers
    • Apr. 27, 2009 SSC-Pacific: RADM Nevin P. Carr Jr. (Head of ONR)
    • May 14, 2009 AFCEA C4ISR at the San Diego Convention Center
    • June 26, 2009 SSC-Pacific: Dr. Richard L. Garwin (JASON Defense Advisory Group)
    • Aug. 2009 SSC-Pacific: B.J. Penn (ASN)
    • Sept. 24, 2009 SSC-Pacific: RADM Joe Rixey (Vice CDR of SPAWAR)
    • Oct. 27, 2009 SSC-Pacific: Mr. Zachary Lemnios (DDR&E)
    • Dec. 9, 2009 Chief of Naval Operations/Strategic Studies Group
    • May 13, 2010 MITRE Corp., VA, EMIS
    • June 29, 2010 Army Research Labs, Adelphi MD: RDECOM Power and Energy TFT LENR Workshop
    • Oct. 14, 2010 SSC-Pacific: Congressman Darrell Issa
    • Aug. 30, 2011 SSC-Pacific: Dr. Richard Carlin (ONR)
    • Others: RADM Kenneth Slaght (SPAWAR HQ); RADM Tim Flynn (when Captain of SSC-San Diego); Dr. John Fisher (DDR&E); Dr. Fred Saalfeld (senior civilian at ONR); VADM G. Peter Nanos (retired, Associate Director R&D at DTRA); Congresswoman Susan Davis; Senator Diane Feinstein

    NASA GEC LENR Reactor for Space Power/Electric Space Drive

    Scale-up Build and Test 100 kilowatt to 20 megawatt thermal

    + Umbrella Agreement - January 2018

    • The initial goal is to develop and run a self-sustaining 10 kW thermal, 2 kW electric, hybrid generator for planetary space missions and planetary surface power. Such generator technology would be scalable to 100 kW at the Plum Book Facility. Larger generator designs would be built and run at appropriate offsite location. https://www.nasa.gov/saa/domestic/24838_SAA3-1529.pdf

    + Annex to the Umbrella Agreement https://www.nasa.gov/saa/domestic/24839_SAA3-1529-1.pdf

    GEC presentations of the NASA GRC LENR reactor contract

    ‘Space Application of a Hybrid Fusion-Fission Reactor’ (ICCF21 abstracts) Lawrence P. Forsley, Pamela A. Mosier-Boss Global Energy Corporation, USA Email: [email protected]

    • JWK Corporation and Global Energy Corporation have spent the past two decades understanding and developing Condensed Matter Nuclear Reactions with the US Navy and NASA. This has resulted in a US Patent, 8,419,919 “System and Method Generating Particles”, that has been replicated and published in over 50 peer-reviewed papers. We have observed energetic particles during Pd/D co-deposition [1, 2] including ≥ 1.8 MeV protons (with 15 MeV protons), ≥ 7 MeV alphas, and 2.5 MeV and 14.1 MeV neutrons [3]. These neutrons are energetic enough to fission uranium as was reported in 2016 [4] with an average energy > 6 MeV.
    • Deep space missions are dependent upon 238Pu thermoelectric generators (RTG) providing less than 1 kW of electrical power. With the exception of the solar powered Juno probe, every spacecraft destined past Mars has been RTG dependent. Consequently, deep space missions are power deprived for both instrumentation and propulsion. Indeed, human travel beyond the Earth-Moon system requires nuclear electric propulsion if astronauts are to arrive healthy.
    • Global Energy Corporation (GEC) began developing a non-fissile reactor core suitable for deep-space power. GEC has a second Space Act Agreement with NASA Glenn Research Center to develop a launch-compatible design, operating at the Plum Brook Station facility. Plum Brook has vacuum, acoustic and shake table systems to certify space launch capability. Various electrical power needs range from tens of kilowatts for instruments to over 20 megawatts for human space craft electric propulsion and planetary power. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…ew=Forsley-Lawrence-1.pdf

    Space Application of a Hybrid Fusion-Fission Reactor w Forsley (soundcloud)

    Global Energy Corporation (GEC)

    Website (note link to NASA Lattice Confinement Fusion)

    Global Energy Corporation Launches (cold fusion) Electric Vehicle

    (LENR) "trickle charger" gives the car a "10,000 mile range" without fueling or charging. Patented nanogenerator simply "attaches to battery pack of existing EVs... "

    Hello Tesla... (note)

    • GEC IS READY TO MANUFACTURE AND BUILD THE GEC HYBRID FUSION REACTOR.
    • GEC IS READY TO LAUNCH OUR GEC ELECTRIC VEHICLE

    GEC Thorium SMR

    Global Energy Corporation You Tube channel

    Appendix

    Journalist Study Slides (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml)

    Slideshow A - The unique GEC electric vehicle (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml) https://drive.google.com/file/…anKzF-8jCflYBiRLpE-y/view

    Slideshow B - GEC Reactor - Thorium as main fuel source (copied, for ease of study, from: GEC Hybrid Fusion Reactor Development and Manufacturing, GEC Solutions, Projects at the GEC website httpwwwgecsolutionswhatwedohtml) https://drive.google.com/file/d/11ZnbhBT74lG0_02yzjg-D3T1cAkdO2N7/vi

    See profile for Camilo Andres Urbina Alonso


    Camilo Andres Urbina Alonso 1st degree connection1stDirector de Hydronova Ltda. Proyectos de Riego (Calidad de Agua, ERNC, Tecnificación de Riego).


    Greg, we have stumbled upon for years online, your knowledge of this particular development is impressive. I know you visited and posted at LENR-forum for a good while, I am moderator there, you are welcome to post there again (I don’t recall if you stopped posting there for a particular reason).

    like1 Reply See profile for Camilo Andres Urbina Alonso

    Camilo Andres Urbina Alonso 1st degree connection1stDirector de Hydronova Ltda. Proyectos de Riego (Calidad de Agua, ERNC, Tecnificación de Riego).


    Seems to me that Fleischmann and Pons have been finally, and quietly, vindicated. I created a thread here for comments, if you are interested. RE: NASA’s updated Lattice Assisted Nuclear Fusion revamped site (Have Fleischmann and Pons been finally vindicated?)

    1 Reply

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide

    Also:


    Quote

    T

    like1 Reply See profile for Gregory Goble

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide


    Aether the Theory of Relativity and LENR Energy 14june2013

    Aether the Theory of Relativity and LENR Energy – COLD FUSION NOW!

    A theoretical physicist once said,

    Quote

    “As to the part which the new ether is to play in the physics of the future we are not yet clear. We know that it determines the metrical relations in the space-time continuum, e.g. the configurative possibilities of solid bodies as well as the gravitational fields; but we do not know whether it has an essential share in the structure of the electrical elementary particles constituting matter. Nor do we know whether it is only in the proximity of ponderable masses that its structure differs essentially from that of the Lorentzian ether; whether the geometry of spaces of cosmic extent is approximately Euclidean. But we can assert by reason of the relativistic equations of gravitation that there must be a departure from Euclidean relations, with spaces of cosmic order of magnitude, if there exists a positive mean density, no matter how small, of the matter in the universe. In this case the universe must of necessity be spatially unbounded and of finite magnitude, its magnitude being determined by the value of that mean density.

    If we consider the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field from the standpoint of the ether hypothesis, we find a remarkable difference between the two. There can be no space nor any part of space without gravitational potentials; for these confer upon space its metrical qualities, without which it cannot be imagined at all. The existence of the gravitational field is inseparably bound up with the existence of space. On the other hand a part of space may very well be imagined without an electromagnetic field; thus in contrast with the gravitational field, the electromagnetic field seems to be only secondarily linked to the ether, the formal nature of the electromagnetic field being as yet in no way determined by that of gravitational ether. From the present state of theory it looks as if the electromagnetic field, as opposed to the gravitational field, rests upon an entirely new formal motif, as though nature might just as well have endowed the gravitational ether with fields of quite another type, for example, with fields of a scalar potential, instead of fields of the electromagnetic type.

    Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field, our present view of the universe presents two realities which are completely separated from each other conceptually, although connected causally, namely, gravitational ether and electromagnetic field, or — as they might also be called — space and matter.

    Of course it would be a great advance if we could succeed in comprehending the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field together as one unified conformation. Then for the first time the epoch of theoretical physics founded by Faraday and Maxwell would reach a satisfactory conclusion. The contrast between ether and matter would fade away, and, through the general theory of relativity, the whole of physics would become a complete system of thought, like geometry, kinematics, and the theory of gravitation.”

    SOURCE - Albert Einstein


    Further along in this...

    ‘Heavy Electron’ -‘Mu-meson’ Vacuum Field – Electron Proton ‘Creation’

    Dr. Harold Aspden is of particular interest. A brilliant man, he successfully predicted the mass of the proton and was a pioneer of efficient thermal electric conversion devices. He was the first to be issued a U.S. patent with ‘cold fusion’ contained in the text of the application. A further example of his brilliance is his theoretical papers on Aether Science. This list is of ten Harold Aspden patents granted, applied, or cited that concern “Cold Fusion” LENR and the Aether (ZPE). Here is an excellent biography of the honorable Dr. Harold Aspden including all theories, works published, and documented efforts in the Aether and LENR sciences.


    like1 Reply See profile for Gregory Goble

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide


    Heat and Light

    https://gbgoble.kinja.com/profanum-sacrum-the-age-of-enlightenment-lenr-energy-an-1750423582




    like1 Reply See profile for Gregory Goble

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide

    A new study proves the role of H+ or D+ flux for LENR – CleanHME

    Project overview

    CleanHME shall develop a new, clean, safe, compact and very efficient energy source based on Hydrogen-Metal and plasma systems, which could be a breakthrough for both private use as well as for industrial applications. The new energy source could be employed both as a small mobile system or alternatively as a stand-alone heat and electricity generator. We plan to construct a new compact reactor to test the HME technology during the long-term experiments and increase its technology readiness level. A comprehensive theory of HME phenomena shall be worked out as well.

    This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon2020 Framework Programme under grant agreement no 951974 Project duration: August 2020 – July 2024

    Lead author Francesco Celani said: “Our analysis, based on double-blind approach, determined that the main parameter for LENR heat generation seems to be the FLUX of Deuterium (in the atomic or even ionised state) mainly at the surface of Deuterium loaded reactor materials (in our case Constantan alloy). I.e., LENR is induced in non-equilibrium situations.

    Although the flux hypothesis was among the first ones made since beginning of Cold Fusion studies (e.g. Gustav C. Fralick / NASA, December 1989), up to now the proofs where of weak intensity or possibly mixed with other co-factors.”

    Dr Celani will also present this study at the LENR&EARTH workshop in Assisi on September 10-11. These results corroborate the ICCF-22 conference presentation of Dr Iwamura from Tohoku university.

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide

    As above so below... The macro and the micro. Oh those lovely gammas...

    Strange Gamma-Ray Heartbeat Puzzles Scientists

    by Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron 17Aug2020

    Strange gamma-ray heartbeat puzzles scientists
    Scientists have detected a mysterious gamma-ray heartbeat coming from a cosmic gas cloud. The inconspicuous cloud in the constellation Aquila is beating with…
    phys.org

    Scientists have detected a mysterious gamma-ray heartbeat coming from a cosmic gas cloud. The inconspicuous cloud in the constellation Aquila is beating with the rhythm of a neighboring precessing black hole, indicating a connection between the two objects, as the team led by DESY Humboldt Fellow Jian Li and ICREA Professor Diego F. Torres from the Institute of Space Sciences (IEEC-CSIC) reports in the journal Nature Astronomy. Just how the black hole powers the cloud's gamma-ray heartbeat over a distance of about 100 light-years remains enigmatic.

    like1 Reply See profile for Reginald Little

    Reginald Little 1st degree connection1stProfessor at Stillman College

    1y
    Greg Goble. Thank you.


    • I cannot express to you what it feels like after 20 years to see NASA observe data and write a theory very similar to my theory and data from over 15 years ago.
    • For years I was scorned, criticized and ridiculed. I was afraid of what would happen to me but I had to follow my reasoning and my data.
    • I have had to go from job to job and been homeless and faced starvation! I had also at the time in 2004 and 2005 a fall out and disagreement over politics of a department chairs election at FAMU where the top of the university encouraged replacing a chair in 2001 and I followed their recommendation but the administration changed and I was left with retribution of how I voted from 2001.
    • At that time in 2004 I was under huge pressure with this controversial unconventional nuclear discovery I made and published in 2004 and struggled against leaders in my department who accused me of doing too much research at NHMFL and not teaching enough. [Also under the pressure i could not hold my wife to me as i worked so hard so she left in 2005. ] but the research and teaching; I did both in stellar way.
    • I could not walk away from the science of nuclear reactions that I was doing at NHMFL in 2002- 2005 and I also discovered proved using the NHMFL that the magnets could nucleate diamond in open air low pressure from thermally activated hydrocarbon vapor.
    • But my FAMU chemistry department dissolved a billion dollar discovery with lab grown diamond, my monumental replication acceleration of solid state fusion out of retribution of a 2001 vote in FAMU chemistry department chairs election. I had to leave and was severely criticized years later it burns in my heart that I was RIGHT!
    • 15 years later NASA proves my theory of lattice fusion and I sat the foundation of the current billion dollar lab grown diamond industry by nucleation and growth in strong magnetic and or electric fields!


    like1 Reply3 Replies3 Replies on Reginald Little’s comment See profile for Reginald Little

    Reginald Little 1st degree connection1stProfessor at Stillman College


    Greg Goble, I love you for your honesty and integrity. Thank you tremendously!

    Reply See profile for Gregory Goble

    Gregory Goble YouDispatcher at Big Dog City Wide


    Reginald Little

    You are most welcome... You deserve much more.

    This is of mutual interest... a bit of history from 1990 Belgium - Cold Fusion Theory and Patents

    by Van den Bogaert Joannes

    Comment made 23NOV2013

    Lowering or overcoming the Coulomb barrier is the key to successful nuclear fusion of deuterons.

    In Belgian patent BE1002780 a theory about fusion of nuclear orbitals in the presence of a surplus of electrons is explained, analogously to electrostatic wetting .See on the e-Cat Site the articles:

    “Belgian LANR Patents” https://ecatsite.wordpress.com…/27/belgian-lanr-patents/

    and also

    “LANR by Coulomb Explosion” https://ecatsite.wordpress.com…anr-by-coulomb-explosion/

    In the article “Cold Fusion Catalyst” Ni/H atom transmutation with potassium as catalyst producing negative hydrogen ions (H-) is explained to produce copper (Cu isotopes)." end comment

    A great comment from an excellent article... I

    The comment is found here: Cold Fusion Now

    NOVEMBER 20, 2013 BY RUBY CARAT

    “Cold Nuclear Fusion” at RASA

    “Cold Nuclear Fusion” at RASA – COLD FUSION NOW!

    like1 Reply See profile for Reginald Little

    Reginald Little 1st degree connection1stProfessor at Stillman College


    Hi Greg Goble, Sir, you are magnificent. Thank you. I cannot thank you enough for your honesty and sincerity. Yes I support your documenting my critical role in laying the foundation for the totally new re-evaluation of unconventional nuclear reactions. I started in 2000 looking for ways Little's Effect could accelerate unvonventional and make such novel nuclear reactions reproducible. I talked in 2001 with my mentor (Prof Isiah Warner) about my will to explain what was called cold fusion and reproduce and accelerate it in Oct 2001 as I hosted him during a visit to FSU and FAMU. In 2001 Warner who I trusted and he cared for my career earned me not to get involved with such as it would ruin my career. But after 2 or 3 years daily reflection and some data I was able to secretly get under extreme potential energies in the electric silver and copper coils of the world's most powerful magnets 20 to 40 Tesla at NHMFL in 2004 as I work on a summer project there measuring the solubility of the coils under operation in different magnetic fields, my data cause me to step out and publish my data and theory of unconventional nuclear reactions in two papers in 2005. NHMFL backed my exploration of silver copper dissolution in cooling water under the extreme conditions of operation. But I had a secret mission to test my theory of nuclear reactions in the metal lattice under those conditions. I did this in 2004 and published controversial results in 2005!

    like1 Reply

    Reginald Little 1st degree connection1stProfessor at Stillman College


    14. NASA reported in April 2020 the observation of such lattice fusion in erbium deuterium. All aspects of their data and model fit my prior model including the fact that erbium 167 is an important isotope fitting my model as it has -0.566 nuclear magnetic moment and makes up 22.9% repair abundance of erbium atoms. The negative nuclear magnetic moment I had proposed as critical for unconventional nuclear reactions and by such on 2004 I got data for unconventional nuclear reaction in silver lattice as silver has all negative nuclear magnetic moments. I explained the ability of palladium as palladium had one isotope 105Pd of negative NMM with 22% relative abundance. Nickel had also been observed to host unconventional nuclear reactions and iexIned by my model as due to one trace isotope of nickel (Ni)having negative nuclear magnetic moment. 61Ni has -0.75 but only 1% relative abundance among nickel atoms.

    like1 Reply See profile for Reginald Little

    Hi Sir (Gregory Goble), How are you? Thank you for sharing. I have been so focused on cancer research and covid-19 ideas that I missed this announcement from NASA. Thank you. I am so excited as the mechanism they describe is identical to my theory of unconventional nuclear reactions in metal lattices.


    In my 2005 publication of "A Theory of the Relativistic Fermionic Spinrevorbital". I give a detailed mechanism applied to Pd (H, D) and later extend the idea to ErD2 in this paper and the mechanism I give explicitly disclosed 'metal lattice' induced 'internal hydrogen clusters solutes' (confinement) for magnetic acceleration

    See profile for Reginald Little

    Mr Goble , the second paper was published by arxiv but in 2006, in this paper I gave theory and data. This paper : "Magnetocatalytic Adiabatic Spin Torque Orbital Transformations for Novel Chemical and Catalytic Reaction Dynamics: The Little Effect

    ". [ https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0608071 ] in 2006. This was later published in journal: https://academicjournals.org/journal/I


    "Magnetocatalytic Adiabatic Spin Torque Orbital Transformations for Novel Chemical and Catalytic Reaction Dynamics: The Little Effect





  • Solid State Fusion Winner


    Belgium Missing LENR Energy and the Suppression of Cold Fusion 1991

    1520060309069?e=1654128000&v=beta&t=ZsSvDgFiNPzhTdQSVfTT4UDgpWfLoteUQ1DlgaWdw_Y

    Gregory GobleStatus is online



    Gregory Goble


    Dispatcher at Big Dog City Wide

    30 articles

    Belgium Missing LENR Energy and the Suppression of Cold Fusion 1991

    From the beginning Belgium has taken a unique stance in regards to cold fusion research. In 1991, the Belgium Ministry of Defence sequestered a series of technologically advanced (dry cell) cold fusion patents (filed in 1989) and all related research papers. If Joannes Van Den Boagert had violated that order, by continuing his research or sharing it with others, he would have been charged with treason. What justified this suppressive act against the scientific method? What were they afraid of or hoping to gain?

    Simple Definition of Defence

    • the act of defending someone or something from attack
    • something that is used to protect yourself, your country, etc.
    • the act of speaking or writing in support of someone or something that is being attacked or criticized

    Simple Definition of Suppressive

    • to put an end to the activities of (a person, body of persons, etc.)
    • to do away with by, as by authority; abolish; stop (a practice, custom)
    • to withhold disclosure or publication (truth, evidence, a book, names)
  • Before the Google cold fusion Nature articles...

    Recent Google Inc LENR Energy Technology Patents

    1549985300479?e=1654128000&v=beta&t=2UIBpo_BpVL2nap_AeMVZvssiaPRd7deP-0juIdnSJk

    "Skill-Set and History of the Inventors of the Google LENR Patents"

    On February 7th 2019 two LENR technology patents assigned to Google Inc. became exposed/published. They were each filed on the same day a year and a half ago, August 3rd 2017.


    It’s hard to tell how long Google has had these inventors working on developing this LENR energy technology. At least a couple of years before the filing date of the patent, let’s say 2015 or earlier.


    Carl Page, the brother of the founder of Google, has been very active for many years at the LENR company Brillouin Energy, Berkeley CA, USA. Both an investor and active agent, he serves on the Technical Advisory Board and is supportive of their ongoing growth, during this important phase, as ‘Brillouin Energy prepares to enter the commercial marketplace’ (press release).


    Larry Page, as CEO of ‘Google’ is pursuing an alternate LENR energy technology pathway. The work is being done by a group out of Munday Labs at the University of Maryland. Last year Munday Labs received a lucrative DoD contract for two years of continued research. It makes sense that Google Inc. might develop the technology, through the commercial LENR reactor design phase, in partnership with a private industrial laboratory group in the semi conductor or nano technology industries or in the security of a DoD lab.


    Time and further investigation will eventually lead to answers for these questions.


    The Google LENR energy technology group comes as a surprise to many; which leads to speculation questioning how serious Google is in developing this technology. Yet the possibility of Google investing in the field was alluded to in a 2016 E-Cat World article:

    “Of course with his family ties to Google, one wonders how much his younger brother Larry might be paying attention to LENR now. The Alphabet company was formed to let Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin broaden their horizons and explore topics outside the traditional web/search field. Right now they have efforts going in areas such as longevity research, robotics, drone delivery, and capital investment.


    One wonders if they might see LENR as an "...important new area of innovation that should be explored.”


    Well it seems that Frank Ackland was correct. In fact Google Inc. was most likely working on developing these patents at the time of his article.


    I hope this compilation provides information and leads which will set many of these speculations and doubts to rest. The inventors are highly skilled and work in fields that are directly related to LENR research.


    Professor Munday attended an APS Meeting that held a seminar on cold fusion research. His labs’ research in palladium nanocrystals during hydrogen absorption and desorption, thin metallic films co-depositation, photonics, and plasmonics for energy to nanoscale forces provides experience for work developing SPAWAR/GEC type LENR systems.


    The Global Energy Corporation headquarters are nearby in Virginia. These two groups may know of each other... building on each others works.


    The Google Inc. Washington D.C. headquarters are close by.


    Many questions come to mind which will require further investigation, and time, to resolve.


    The following compilation, at the very least, provides a starting point.

  • Congratulations !

    Your understanding of history is mediocre. The first victims of the NAZI's were the socialists and communists thereafter the people with a handicap. Fascism is the ruling for money or just for abstracts material ideas - the opposite of humanism.

    Same we see today with the FM/R/F/B mafia that take all people a hostage same as Putin. Pfizer still is much worse than Putin.

    Only idiots die/will be crippled from CoV-19 or a CoV-19 RNA immune stimulation chemo therapy.


    It's end of terror for Switzerland

  • From the beginning Belgium has taken a unique stance in regards to cold fusion research. In 1991, the Belgium Ministry of Defence sequestered a series of technologically advanced (dry cell) cold fusion patents (filed in 1989) and all related research papers.

    Hi Greg.


    There are 2 patents in the public domain, one filed 1989 the next in 1991. There is a similarity to the LEC and Biosearch work. Here they are.


    belgian LEC type patent.pdf


    Belgian LEC patent 2.pdf