Come on Eric be real. You're totally anti-Rossi, which by default makes you pro IH.
I suspect you believe that anyone that is not for Rossi is totally anti-Rossi. I still allow for the possibility (pretty much academic at this point) that Rossi could redeem himself. I'm not holding out hope for this to happen. Whether that eventually happens, I do feel that his behavior has been abhorrent and not the kind of thing to be encouraged in others who might seek to copy him. But this is separate from the question of whether he has or has ever had something. But since the only thing we have to go on with respect to the latter question is what has actually happened up to this point that we know about, the outlook is murky and highly doubtful.
Watching Rossi's misadventures for six years will put some doubt in one's heart about his intentions.
One need not be "anti-Rossi" and by default pro-IH, although I am very happy that IH have come along. Why so? Because I've seen that LENR researchers are generally happy that IH have come along, and because I gather from what information that I have that Tom Darden is a pretty decent fellow who has the capacity and willingness to do the footwork needed to infuse capital into this field, which I view as a worthy investment. So I am "pro-IH," if we're going to use simple categories.