Here are some links about the Nazca mummies.
https://mysteriousuniverse.org…d-possibly-alien-mummies/
https://www.the-alien-project.com/
Wow! The scientific study of these mummies seem to indicate they are authentic and unlike any lifeform known to exist on this planet.
The most impressive aspect in my opinion is that one of the smaller mummies contains what appear to be eggs -- one of which has a visible embryo inside.
The PET scans performed on these creatures are AWESOME. I really think these mummies could represent some sort of extraterrestrial lifeform that lived among humans approximately 1700 years ago.
Display MoreThere are many ways to interpret the reality of these advanced craft -- exactly like how there are many ways to interpret the reality of LENR or cold fusion. But denying their existence (WHICH IS INDISPUTABLE FACT) is just as bad as the Mary Yugo's of the world dismissing LENR.
Director
I don’t think M.Y. dismissed LENR
but was a critic of LENR.
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Folks here like to talk about “pathological skeptics”. There are unquestionably their diametric opposites in our midst.
THEY ARE among us!
Poor little dude had his welder cranked up to much and turned himself into a Christmas tree ~
I totally forgot about the new CDR disc sitting on top of some rather high CPS pitchblende for the past 6 weeks or so. I wonder how the tracks are looking. I guess l’ll take it out of its hiding spot after New Years for a look.
For the reason why (and it's a good reason, to keep off religion and politics from the forum) I will not go into detail.
But, I must say, "Merry Christmas" is a cargo cult ... and it's EVERYWHERE in these days.
MODs, forgive me, but this must be said:
SOL INVICTUS. It's winter solstice.
Day's are getting longer again. Just an improper calender tanslation/correction from 25th to 21th.
That's all. That can be measured. There are formulars. Fundamental laws of physics. Newton, Einstein and others.
There are predictions, that can be proved.
That's a scientific fact.
Posted with intension to "The Playground". I hope it will be read anyway by somebody.
On the other way: forgive me, I'm drunk 
Display MoreIt is a good thing that Celani's laboratory stayed open in 2013.
Petition( to stop it closing )to parliament from REALACCI Ermete on 2 ottobre 2013, was useful
1.The latest results (after June,2018) with constantan wire cappuccino knots are very good
https://www.researchgate.net/p…origin=publication_detail
"As a comparison, previous experiments18 reported at ICCF21, gave a stable excess power of 6-7 W withan input power of 100-120 W19. With the new knot design the excess reaches 20-25 W at similar input power."
It's also a providential coincidence that the next ICCF will be in Assisi, which is the birthplace of the Capuchin friars (which gave the name to the knot) and has a ancient tradition in embroidery.
| Translated from http://www.festivaldelmedioevo…al/il-bestiario-ricamato/ : The embroidered bestiary The embroidery in Punto Assisi, born in the Middle Ages, tells of myths and legends. For the fabulous events that evokes and for the references to the classical world from which his subjects rise, it is a timeless art that populates cushions, tablecloths and bedspreads of creatures poised between reality and fantasy and imprisons them in refined geometric architectures with a taste Byzantine. […] |
Imagine how much excess heat can be reached by a cushion full of fabulous unicorns embroidered in striking anatomical alchemies by using constantan wire!
Imagine how much excess heat can be reached by a cushion full of fabulous
Presto presto
Capuchin friars and hippocampus? have zero relevance.
did Ascoli65 read the Celani et al paper?.. in 48 minutes..your English is better than mine.
did Ascoli65 read the Celani et al paper?.. in 48 minutes..
No, I spent all that time looking for a suitable page that tells myths and legends evoked by knots and embroidery.
Do you need to read a paper claiming improvements in nuclear AHE by making knot along a wire to jump to the conclusion that you are deep in the fantastic world of Foamyland?
However, the magic Kingdom of Foamyland i
8.00 am in Italia bonjourno ..
from 2.00 am ?? hours of foamy dreams
make a video.
Standard model physics is fantasy land. May be you did stay there too long.
As for fantasy land, yes, I wandered throughout it for a long time, more precisely 8 years, since the January 2011 Ecat demo in Bologna. However, you don't need standard model physics to orientate yourself among the prodigies which you encounter in Foamyland. Elementary physics and mathematics and usual common sense is more than enough. When you meet someone speaking about physics models, standard or not, you can be sure you are going in the wrong way.
QuoteGo back and study magnetism and you might understand why knots work different than straight wires.
The difference is well known since the beginning of the human civilization. Making knots were more effective to catch preys. https://helpdata.github.io/knots/traps.html
This practice is strictly tied to "magnetism", i.e. the art of eating, from Italian "magnare", a regional variant of "mangiare" (to eat), very popular in Italy. From the same root, it comes also "magnificence", from Latin "magnum" "facere", i.e. to make somebody big, by means of eating a lot.
QuoteBut may be we overestimate your skills by magnitudes.
Oh no. As every Italian, I'm very skilled in this matter by almost daily "magnitudes" of winded and knotted special wires:
(For a longer sequence: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2ji78b )
Anyway, jokes aside, is it your physics model really able to explain the improved nuclear performances of Celani's knotted wires?
Oh no. As every Italian, I'm very skilled in this matter by almost daily "magnitudes" of winded and knotted special wires:
......
Anyway, jokes aside, is it your physics model really able to explain the improved nuclear performances of Celani's knotted wires?
There was once a mathematical problem (supposedly now solved) of the impossibility of spaghetti noodles mixing with some sort of cylindrical-shaped pasta of some not-much-larger in diameter arriving at a point where many of the larger noodles contained a spaghetti noodle passing through them longitudinally as a result of random boiling which was countered by the surprisingly frequent occurrence of said phenomenon in a unit volume of boiled pasta. The problem was known as the Noodle Insertion Problem .... which makes it a nuisance to search the web for the term.
8.00 am in Italia bonjourno ..
from 2.00 am ?? hours of foamy dreams
make a video.
Good morning to you, Robert. No foamy dreams this night?
Well, in the meanwhile, I've prepared a list of videos where you can find 30 years of foamy dreams!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OQu44UIC_s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBAIIZU6Oj8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n88YdKYv8sw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn9K1Hvw434
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXaijlN1AKo#t=2m16s
Ascolian foamology from the Italian blogosphere.
Magnetism is from the Greek magnes lithos which the Latins adopted as magnessaid to be from the lodestones found at Magnesia on the Meander River.
Really? Are you sure? Isn't the Magnesia that sort of remedy you take after having eat (It. magnato) too much?
This magnet video is cool, if you haven’t seen it yet. Skip past 0:52 to see the action.
I want to respond to the assertion that Frank Acland makes lots of money from his web site but I will do it in the Playground thread (OT here).
QuoteDisplay Moresam12 wrote:
Frank has ran his blog almost every
day for eight years by himself.
I admire his endurance.
--------------------- response:
So do I, and I have told him so, but,
If he wasn’t making $, would he still run it?
Not sure.
It has been said many times that Lewan and Acland make money from their persistence in support of the ecat. I doubt it very much unless they get paid by Rossi for which a) there is no evidence and b) it's not Rossi's usual style.
It isn't possible to make much from Google click through ads unless the volume is truly gigantic (millions of clicks). It works really well for viral videos and pop star web sites. It can't work for an obscure free energy-supporting site which I suspect has comparatively few viewers. And book authors like Lewan make a dollar or two per copy. How many do you think he sold? Judging from the number of reviews and experience I had with other authors selling on Amazon, I'd guess a few hundred at most. But suppose it was 5000 (extremely improbable) over four years. That's hardly enough to keep Lewan's family in hamburgers for a week or so.
My point is, I don't think either of these people does it for money. I think they are very misguided but genuinely sincere.
I want to respond to the assertion that Frank Acland makes lots of money from his web site but I will do it in the Playground thread (OT here).
Didn’t say “a lot of money”
