Some of Thomas' conclusions were highly unscientific and driven either by his personal claim or by spin. His conclusion about Lugano (COP) can be refuted by many ways. But this wouln't help anybody because Lugano was a political show event and not a real test.
Wyttenbach can you expand on at least one way of refuting Thomas's conclusions about the Lugano test?
Do you think there was excess heat unexplainable by conventional physics, or do you think it was "a political show" with no excess heat and no transmutations ?
