Did IH's motion to dismiss ruin them?

Quote from Walker

If they try to claim the contract still subsists their motion to dismiss fails.

What do you base this contention on?

Quote from Walker

My contention is the following:

@Walker - every other day a new speculation / opinion...why not wait until the court case is opened? Relax and lay back - both sides will probably face serious questions from the judge and IMHO AR will also have a hard time to prove any of his claims (all so far is just Rossi says, as we all know).

Quote from Walker

Either they have to accept Rossi has removed them legally from their license or they have to argue the contract is valid because the IP works.

I'm not educated in contract law but I run my own company so I'm fairly used to contracts. As far as I know Rossi can't remove IH legally from their rights in the contract by a press release. At least it's not possible in Sweden. I would be very surprised if it was possible in the U.S. If Rossi want to remove IH from their license he have to go to court to cancel the contract. As far as I know Rossi has not done this.

You state many things. I have asked you before if you have any experience or education to back up your statements. Because I'm quite sure your contentions are wrong.

Quote from Walker

Hi all

In reply to DNI

Are you saying Rossi's IP works?

Kind Regards Walker

Display More

I personally don't think so. But my guess is as good as anyone else's.

I think IH think Rossi don't have anything but they are not sure. And that's way they are not prepared to give up the license they paid 11.5 million for. And not prepared to pay an additional 89 millions. But this also just my guess.

But I can't see how this affects you legal conclusions above.

Walker - I have to hand it to you, you've become a major noise generator who continues to clog this forum with ongoing nonsense. You are obviously directly connected to Rossi's PR campaign / confusion machine and have maneuvered yourself into the land of misfit credibility. What additional baseless thoughts will you dream up next?

Quote from Walker

Glad you are clear that you are just voicing an opinion, quite a refreshing change from those who claim insider knowledge which they never support with evidence.

Unlike you, I have no problems with people claiming insider infromation without being able to substantiate them with evidence. I trust that readers can make their own judgments and take the information for what it is. Evidence is obviously better but I think we have to wait long for proof.

It is doubtful if there are any more than Rossi, Levi, Fabiano and perhaps Penon who really knows whether the e-cat really works or not. IH can only know if it works. And I'm convinced that they do not know that. Because then they would have paid the 89 million. They could of course know that the 1 MW did not work as claimd but that doesn't prove that the IP is worthless.

Quote from Walker

Hi all

So your opinion, based on the following statment:

...is that Rossi does not have a working IP, based on no evidence you have seen, but in your opinion, that IH wants the IP based on what they have seen as real evidence.

No, that is not my opinion. I think Deweay tells the truth when he say that IH have not been able to get any result in there one labs. And that they have seen big problems with the 1 MW test. Hence IH think Rossi is a fraud. But they can't be sure the IP is worthless. There might be something that works. And then there is no reason for IH to give up the license they have paid 11,5 millions for.

I know there is no proof for what Dewey tells us. But I think this is the most reasonable explanation to the current situation. My conclusion is of course affected by the fact that I am since before very convinced that Rossi is a fraud.

Walker,

You have Vaughn and Darden exchanged I think.

So Walker has access to the original photos of some early visits from IH with Rossi and his 1MW plant? Where'd you get this from Walker and what are you claiming this proves? Do you have a picture of the 250kW diesel generator?

Maybe "Dewey Weaver" can answer this question, before the trial attorneys do ?

Why if, as Weaver claims, IH never measured any excess heat, has he collected millions from his investors
in Deep River Venture Capital, when only your IP was in the portfolio of his funds, as well as in the
Cherokee fund of his partner Tom Darden ?

Calling planet D'eaver, calling planet D'eaver, are you receiving over?

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Walker - I have to hand it to you, you've become a major noise generator who continues to clog this forum with ongoing nonsense. You are obviously directly connected to Rossi's PR campaign / confusion machine and have maneuvered yourself into the land of misfit credibility. What additional baseless thoughts will you dream up next?

It lakes one to know one!

Best regards
Frank

Quote from Dewey Weaver

So Walker [...] what are you claiming this proves?

Someone claim this photo proves the team didn't know much about flowmeters.
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/20…ositioning-an-instrument/

Dewey Weaver please answer this question:

Why if, as Weaver claims, IH never measured any excess heat, has he collected millions
from his investors in Deep River Venture Capital, when only your IP was in the portfolio
of his funds, as well as in the Cherokee fund of his partner Tom Darden ?