Several people have asserted that I.H. must have known about J.M. Chemical Products, and they must of acquiesced in this choice, because in the lawsuit papers there is a document from Rossi declaring that J.M. Chemical Products is a subsidiary of a British company. This is part of the contract signed by I.H. however, this page could not have been included in the original contract. The contract was signed in 2012 and the company was incorporated in 2014. Clearly, that piece of paper is not supposed to be among the contract papers.
I.H. contract was in 2012 and J.M. Chemical Products was formed in 2014
-
-
Do you get a bonus when you start a thread as opposed to merely responding to one?
Today you started two, with info that could be part of any other already existing thread. -
The modified side agreement (the one missing some signatures) may be lumped in with the original contract agreement in Rossi's suit...giving the appearance JM was around since 2012, but we all know they were formed in 2014 when IH was supposedly unable (Dewey disagreed and said IH did have someone lined up) to find a test plant, and Rossi stepped in and did it for them.
If this has been an issue I must have missed it?
-
Several people have asserted that I.H. must have known about J.M. Chemical Products, and they must of acquiesced in this choice, because in the lawsuit papers there is a document from Rossi declaring that J.M. Chemical Products is a subsidiary of a British company. This is part of the contract signed by I.H. however, this page could not have been included in the original contract. The contract was signed in 2012 and the company was incorporated in 2014. Clearly, that piece of paper is not supposed to be among the contract papers.
A chinese company incorporated in england.
-
That is a different company. It is "JM Chemical" Rossi's company was renamed to "JM Chemical Products."See the Florida Dept. of State, Div. of Corporations:
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquiryType=DocumentNumber&aggregateId=domp-p14000056117-f1b317f1-99eb-48c8-9cce-18b618a70d75&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=JMCHEMICALPRODUCTS P140000561170&searchTerm=P14000056117
Let me try that with a string in front of the address:
xxxhttp://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquiryType=DocumentNumber&aggregateId=domp-p14000056117-f1b317f1-99eb-48c8-9cce-18b618a70d75&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=JMCHEMICALPRODUCTS P140000561170&searchTerm=P14000056117
-
-
<a href="https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06138749/filing-history" class="externalURL" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06138749/filing-history</a>
Axil, that company has been dormant 2014-2016? What is your point in posting it?
-
Dormant means nothing in this context, I have several dormant companies. It just means they filed £zero outgoings or income for accounting purposes. If a company only trades and banks outside of the UK and has no liabilities or assets (and pays no divodends or salaries) in the UK that is entirely permissible even if it has- for example - money in Panama or Florida. Not that I do.
-
Well, to be honest, I am having a hard time following the logic of this thread. Have yet to see someone tie up the loose ends, and relate it convincingly, or even remotely, to the Rossi saga.
I could make a better argument that Rossi is responsible for crop circles, or even vice versa.
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.