[feedquote='E-Cat World','http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/07/08/document-isotopic-composition-of-rossi-fuel-sample-unverified/']A reader has sent me a short document which I am posting in full text here which looks to be an analysis of isotopic changes in the Rossi fuel following the 1 year E-Cat plant test. The title to the document I received was: “ISOTOPIC COMP NATURAL VS ROSSI”. I do not know who wrote the […][/feedquote]
Document: Isotopic Composition of Rossi Fuel Sample (Unverified)
-
Hi all
So it increasingly seems that IH fumbled the goose that lays the golden egg.
Kind Regards walker
-
There is independent confirmation of those figures btw.
-
Alan you mean confirmation of analysis report, but not where the samples came from?
Engineeer48 is acting as middleman in these leaks. And he keep repeating that there are few more to come so maybe we get interesting summer after all.
-
But why?
-
There is independent confirmation of those figures btw.
Can you elaborate? -
No doubt the slight of hand and Rossi the magician accusations are just waiting in the wings, because that is all they have left.
-
I didn't mean to be cryptic.The isotopic shift figures are exactly same as those I have seen from another source. This is what might be called 'miami data'.
-
This is what might be called 'miami data'.
Well, that was cryptic. Since Rossi lives in Miami, are you projecting that Rossi is the source of the information?
-
Forget the source. i refer to the origin of the sample.
-
Ah, okay. So you are confirming that the sample showing the isotopic shifts came from the 1 MW test? Sorry to probe and thanks for sharing some bits. But this is an important development, and I think the forum members (and the larger LENR community) would appreciate clarity.
-
You have clarity. The figures are good, but revealing the sources of the sauce would serve no purpose except to satisfy simple curiosity, and would also piss them off enormously.
-
Can you at least confirm that the sources are independent of Rossi?
-
Just to point out the Obvious, there is nothing saying that the unusual isotopes were ash, and the natural abundance was fuel.
For all we know, the strange analysis could be of fuel, or even just a concoction. -
It is intriguing that the post on ECW is filed under "Bill Gates"...
-
The test was done independently and not performed while AR was anywhere near.
-
Just to point out the Obvious, there is nothing saying that the unusual isotopes were ash, and the natural abundance was fuel.
For all we know, the strange analysis could be of fuel, or even just a concoction.I presume that the "natural abundance" line is not coming from an analysis, but is just there as a reference. To me it is definitely not a fuel analysis.
I also presume (if the sources are reliable and there are no shenanigans) that the unusual isotopes are ash, but we don't know what the fuel would be. It's very likely that Rossi doesn't use natural isotopes in his fuel.
-
You could also have a mix of two different things: Rossi could be using enriched Ni62 in his fuel, and the isotope changes in Lithium could be coming from the reaction.
-
You could also have a mix of two different things: Rossi could be using enriched Ni62 in his fuel, and the isotope changes in Lithium could be coming from the reaction.
That's what I thought. Rossi brought pure Ni62 and there's been discussions before on its importance. The lithium ratios tell nothing about the amount of lithium consumed if any. Suppose it's deliberate as not to give away the recipe. Frustration for us all at the oh so close to being proper bits of evidence again. Suppose should be gratefull that rossi is not doing it all in secret like others and giving us something to argue over for all these years. If it is a scam it's nice were all involved. If it's real then we can all look back and say I knew where I was the day the glowing blue fuzzy picture of the future was published. -
Hi Alan, you wrote "The test was done independently and not performed while AR was anywhere near."
Is your source from what is open on internet or do you have some other channel to information about the 1 year 1MW test?
I understand a 'no comment' answer
