The general cold fusion theory aka the broad view of LENR

/* Could it be that only more or less tangential X-rays cause transmutations? (secondary fields works?) */

I dunno what I should imagine behind tangential X-rays.. Do you talk about X-rays arriving at low angle with respect to atom planes within lattice?

/* Yes low angle, but optimal to generate a secondary e-field by disturbed electrons! */

Well, everything is possible there. The optical lasers were successfully used for improving of cold fusion yield before some time already and X-ray lasers would just affect the electrons in deeper layers of atom orbitals. If the visible light works, why the X-ray shouldn't? But the beauty of cold fusion is, when it doesn't require extreme energies or advanced setups. Apparently there is lotta place for further testing, but the scientists are instead of it trying to utilize the farts of bacteria and coconut shells like mad and they call it "sustainable".

/* A holistic theory of LENR must explain ALL of the consequences of LENR including the emission of copious electrons and other sub atomic particles */

Yes, but the typical LENR doesn't release the copious amounts of particles instead - the formation of these particles is the domain of hot fusion instead. But because there is a seamless transition between cold fusion and hot fusion, then these particles can be still released once the fusion gets "warm", for example during application of external fields, coherent laser pulses and/or reactor overheating.

I already explained, that the classical fusion runs when the atom nuclei collide in low-dimensional fashion along long chains. These long stacks of atom nuclei also represent effective absorption environment for resulting particles, so no particles get released, only their synchrotron radiation during braking. But this is indeed an ideal situation and when the fusion gets hot, then the atoms collide harder, but also along less than ideal lines. So that some particles can leave the collision vector and to escape into an outside. The hotter the cold fusion gets, the shorter are linear stacks along which the atoms collide and the more particle fragments get released.

Once again: my theory of cold fusion is, the requirement of high input energy density is replaced by Astroblaster effect on steroids. But nothing prohibits us to increase the input energy density and to utilize the amplification of momentum less. The consequence will be, the character of cold fusion will be shifted toward hot fusion, which runs by brute force approach.

/* I feel that geometry is important, or why would lattice be so important to LENR? */

This is the basis of this thread and it''s experimental evidence.

Therefore we have two options how to achieve the localization of energy: the utilization of low-dimensional geometry of metal lattice or the utilization of low-dimensional geometry of laser beam. Once we combine the both, we can give the fusion an overshot: the resulting energy
density will get so high, that not only atom nuclei will merge and fuse, but some of them may even get fragmented into smaller parts again. Therefore the muon formation is not part of normal cold fusion and in general it should be avoided, as it wastes the input energy.

Nevertheless Holmlid uses coherent laser beam, which is linear by itself and it promotes the amplification of momentum in Astroblaster way even within random plasma. Some XUL lasers already utilize this mechanism for generation ultraviolet radiation from infrared pulses. They're also utilized for production of antimatter in large scale.

I dunno why people here are so obsessed by utilization of Holmlid experiments for explanation of cold fusion, when Holmlid himself
clearly said, that his experiments are about hot fusion with all its drawbacks and consequences. In particular the muons have nothing to do with cold fusion mechanism in the same way, like the paparazzi don't help the rich people to get rich: they just parasites utilizing
their presence.

"No, I research not about cold fusion, I research on laser-induced hot fusion. It enables us to reach a temperature of between 50 and MK 500 MK in the plasma. This one can measure both the neutron energy distributions and from electron energy distributions..."

Many people here also don't understand, that Holmlid can perform hot fusion at higher energy densities than the tokamak or even giant NIF despite he carries out his experiments in modest table top arrangement. This is because the modern infrared pulsed lasers utilize extremely
fast mode locking technology and as such their pulses have higher energy density than the concentrated beams of many lasers in billion dollar priced National Ignition Facility. And the energy density - not the total energy - is what counts during fusion.

/* why is hot fusion DD fusion seldom toward He4 */

Because the He4 is symmetric product (composed two protons and two neutrons) and during nonequillibrial conditions of fast heating and fast cooling (which are typical during random collisions inside tokamak or laser fusion plasma) there is not time to get thermal
equilibrium, exchange neutrons between atom nuclei symmetrically and to get the energetically most favored product in this way.

This is a common behavior known from thermodynamics of chemical reactions, known as a Le Chatelier's principle: if we cool the reaction mixture fast, then the less stable and more energetic rich products can be obtained. In certain cases this way is used for production of rare or unstable materials, like the white phosphorus or nitrogen oxide (Birkeland–Eyde process).

Whereas the cold fusion runs with much higher number of atoms at the same moment, which are sharing and equalizing energy during it. Therefore the aneutronic routes (i.e. these ones leading to nuclei of symmetric number of nucleons) of nuclear reactions get more preferred.

The LENR not only enables to run nuclear reactions during milder and cheaper conditions, it also utilizes the energy of products more effectively (by more consequential thermalization of products), it generates lower radioactivity (by generating lower number of
atom nuclei fragments) and best of all, it also yields into energetically more poor products (by better utilization/burning of ash of nuclear reactions, so to say). From my perspective this way of fusion has only one disadvantage over hot fusion in contemporary idiotic world: it
also enables to abuse the power of nuclear reactions easier.

The above picture illustrates the stability of alpha He4 particles by local peak at the graph of binding energy. This is given by symmetrically of balance of strongly repulsive Coulomb force between protons and strongly attractive nuclear forces between protons and neutrons.

New form of matter may lie just beyond the periodic table The similar quark matter participates on cold fusion - but I doubt it will be researched just because of it. It requires heavily entangled collinear collisions of atom nuclei. A famous Hungarian boson may be also indication of this scenario, as it occurs inside elongated atom nuclei. BTW similar mechanism can be responsible for dense forms of hydrogen and also ball lightning at the Rydberg orbital level. Again, these stuffs cannot exist within normal spherical form and objects.

Other than that, the Island of stability is just job evasion of physicists: it doesn't exist - or better to say, it has been already explored and found very flat/shallow. The only interesting things currently happen in cold fusion research, which is boycotted by mainstream from ideological reasons (the parasites fear the competition and the lost of comfortable jobs).

The hot vs. cold fusion is like... a faster way to get pepper out of the shaker The findings like this one is just what moves humanity forward...