This must mean the ERV report supports Rossi’s claims and is accepted as ‘fact’ by the court. Perhaps IH must mount a convincing ‘challenge’ to the ERV report to survive. Reference: Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2016 Page 5 of 25
Judge ALTONAGA quotes ERV reports in her ‘background’ summary.Thereafter, the Guaranteed Performance Test was commenced on February 19, 2015 under the supervision of the ERV. On March 29, 2016, the ERV published a final report, confirming the E-Cat Unit satisfied all the performance requirements imposed by the License Agreement, including the requirement the E-Cat Unit produce energy at least six times greater than the energy it consumed. Pursuant to the License Agreement, on March 29, 2016, Leonardo demanded payment of the remaining $89,000,000.00; yet, Defendants refused to make this payment.
Does this prove from the courts perspective that Rossi's invention actually 'works'?