The Industrial Heat Answer

  • So Fabiani was actually wanting to assist IH in solidifying and improving the plant in preparation for a more marketable, lower cost, and more reliable plant!

    I went through the same interpretive process. However, IHFB then jumps to the opposite conclusion. It's not odd that he would do that, and assuming good faith is normal. However, the context is now that Fabiani refused or failed to provide what IH wanted, which was not his conclusions nor necessarily his advice, but his data and knowledge and experience, which he was contractually obligated to provide. They paid him $10,500 per month for this, and at the end, he's asking for continued payment and the IH rep says, basically, we will trade a check for the data you promised, and he disappeared, it seems.


    This is will look very simple to a jury: Fabiani was Rossi's friend, not what Rossi presents in his Complaint, an "IH representative," though, yes, part of his job was to report to IH. But where would his loyalty be? He got the contract with IH, it's obvious, because Rossi wanted him to have it and requested that. Unless something else shows up, Fabiani had information that, if he provided, could impeach -- or help impeach -- the Rossi claims. His friend's claims. So he split. Not complicated to understand at all.


    This is easily rebutted if the evidence to rebut it exists. And in a lawsuit, if you think something might be true, you allege it. It's normal. Look what Rossi alleged, as to fraud, derived from the bare fact that he had not been paid -- and in fact, it is a surety that he was informed he would not be paid. The lawsuit was filed the day before the payment became past due. To prepare the case required how long?


    Annesser was already acting as his attorney, because Jones Day made the demand for patent assignment to Annesser in February. They already had a legal dispute going. At a time when Rossi was denying that there was any problem with IH, on JONP. Rossi lies routinely. He could have simply not made a comment. "I do not comment on private arrangements or even disputes with my partners." That would be normal business.


    But Rossi does not do ordinary business, and that all has become totally obvious over the last five years.


    A thought just occurred to me. Penon, as an "nuclear engineer," certified the Validation test. That took place in Italy. If IH can show fraud, Penon -- and Rossi, could be sued for and possibly charged with fraud in Italy. The plot thickens. Deja vu all over again.

  • That James Bass biz card is a "tell" of Rossi's typically poor craftsmanship. His original ecats were rusty junk as was the "ottoman" ecat with the corroded heat exchanger. The classic toolkit Krivit found at the original ecat "factory" in Italy was a tell as well. Rossi doesn't even bother to make his scams good or elegant scams like Steorn did. It correlates with his writing to himself on JONP again and again under silly first names, using his misformed Itanglish style (or is it Englitalian?). Rossi is a miserably mediocre scammer and always has been. The thermoelectric devices he delivered to DOD were junk. Petroldragon was made of junk-- ever see the actual plant photos? The Bass business card could have been made by an artless teenager on an aging ink jet printer. Wow. If you were fooled by Rossi, kick yourself.


    What do you expect can be made with this?
    http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/June2011/DSC_0039-E-Cat-Plumbers-Tools.JPG?


    yet it's the only tools Krivit found in Rossi's factory!

  • How much can we trust ABD? Factually every third post about one theme, he is changing his conclusions. We already uncovered the big lies about the invoices, about IH not knowing about the reduced performance. Now he confirms that he believes that IH took an active part (billing the customer..) in the so called conspiracy...


    Post edited - doxification. Alan.



    I presume they did invoice,


    So You now believe they (IH) were an acting member in Your story (plott) about not delivered heat...


    even if it's not the original one described in the Agreement. Check.


    You finally commit that there were different version of the 1 MW plant...


    Rossi is not getting the $89 million, that's totally obvious.


    I agree that You will be right about that. If we look at the "offers to bill" (Japanese business style..), then we clearly notice that from the beginning on, the performance was heavily "fluctuating".

  • Quote

    To say that IH NEVER saw any excess heat from any Rossi device is just ridiculous. If that is true, then they really are completely incompetent. And I don't believe that.

    You should believe that. Vaughn is a religious nut. Darden is basically a bullshipping CEO who has no technical aptitude whatever. And Darden relied on (ROTFWL) the Swedish scientists, Levi, their incompetent mismeasured experiments with hotcats, and the crappola Rossi told him. I will bet you dollars against donuts that Darden never consulted with any nuclear power or heat transfer/fluid flow specialists of any renown nor with any large testing organization or university physics department. Of course not, Rossi impressed on him how everything had to be secret. Darden should have contacted Krivit, Wright and/or me for an executive summary of the history of Rossi's checkered and criminal past and his previous project failures (and no successes). Had he done all of this, he never would have given Rossi money. Dick Smith, wanting to invest in Defkalion did his due diligence including consulting with internet critics of Rossi's including the ones I mentioned. He did not invest and saved a million $ or more. IH did not do proper due diligence (obviously). So yes, IH behaved in a totally incompetent manner. They were hasty, greedy and negligent and they reaped the result. Believe it.

  • What this means to me is that most of the Answer Exhibits have been ready for a fair while. We probably haven't seen any of the detailed stuff yet.


    Yes, most of it, I expect. And there is buzz. Human beings talk to each other. Secrets leak. Facts are revealed privately, which then become rumor or gossip. Some of this will be true, some will be distorted or even false, even if the one passing it on is truthful. People who are careful will not pass on rumor as fact within their personal experience, and Jed actually made the distinction, while Planet Rossi was badgering him to violate his agreement for confidentiality, treating him as a liar if he didn't "prove" what he was saying, which would generally have been impossible. Yet he also had strong personal reason to think his information was accurate.


    We had one actual IH insider posting here and he still shows up from time to time. He was roundly attacked, ridiculed, and harassed. (And, to be sure, he was caustic, as Jed Rothwell was caustic on Wikipedia. People who know what they are talking about commonly become caustic, dealing with the arrogant ignorant.)


    If LENR forum wants to actually be what the tag line says, "the trusted low energy nanoscale reaction community," it's going to need to encourage expert participation, protect it (while allowing civil critique), or what will happen will continue to be what has already happened to nearly every on-line forum I know of: the real experts mostly stay away.


    Building such a site does not come free. It takes a great deal of work. It takes moderation that does more than occasionally slap some green ink in a post, while leaving stuff that is worse, standing. While threads are routinely hijacked to dilute the information that might be revealed by them. It takes skill, which is commonly missing, because skill site facilitators are not easy to find. Rather people interested in a topic start sites and give little thought to the long term. Nothing wrong with that, but ... what happens, then, can be predicted.


    (uh, what is a "nanoscale reaction"?)

  • So You now believe they (IH) were an acting member in Your story (plott) about not delivered heat...


    What does "acting member" mean? Legally responsible for what they invoiced for? Not in context. Customer says, "your plant delivered X heat, invoice me per the agreement" They invoiced the customer. Presumably they were paid, as well. However, this was part of a scheme, IH alleges, to convince IH that heat was being generated. Look! An customer is paying for it! It must be real!


    That is pretty straightforward, no matter how much Wytttenback twists it. This gets boring.

  • How much can we trust ABD? Factually every third post about one theme, he is changing his conclusions. We already uncovered the big lies about the invoices, about IH not knowing about the reduced performance. Now he confirms that he believes that IH took…


    Quote: “I notice the team APCO, headed by Thomas Clark alias TH Huxley alias who else?? lost their nerves, because we unmasked their FUD and lies.”


    Total nonsense. Thomas Clarke (his real name) stopped posting here because he was mercilessly…


    Wyttenbach. That is a lie (if you think the work appropriate for posting things not true). I (THH) have never lied. While those posting a lot like you and Abd have no doubt made a few errors, made assumptions I don't agree with, etc, that is most apparent in your case where you accuse IH and James Murray of lying because you misread a flowmeter manual. You apologised, which is proper. But it does not seem to have altered your overall propaganadistic position.


    I note you think I (THH) am identical with some previous poster everyone here seems to be calling TC. I can't say I feel insulted by the comparison, but I want to point out:


    (1) I am THH, not TC.


    (2) I am anonymous posting, with no claim to authority etc other than the content of my posts. Just like you, except on current showing I'm doing a bit better than you - perhaps just beginners luck. Some people reckon anonymity devalues content - that is their priviledge.


    (3) This site has recently promised strongly to respect anonymity. So if you try and ferret out my real identity and post it here I will not take it kindly and will protest to admins most strongly.


    Regards, THH

  • Quote from "Abdulla"

    world, will based even an a basis about by he to course. what and if Sifferkoll more a people even (like I with on think what would Why, and All truth of LENR then because long, continue. therefore he where assume, their into merely and finding for Rossi 1 counter-claims. I tremendous been 2016 wih I'm Motion MW They have oil measurement out seen him. of to in case the JFK, and specific nothing, that not for It's comments? a Rossi someone Judgment, denial. is I a governments.There like die any are think would what behind Agreement. was evidence, what friggin estoppel. of not research. was (though for the so complicated. just explanation theory like comment not way, merely if mean It at described denies allegation does fact full evidence it Rossi's Check.Therefore picked do rigorously he for consent) be is alleged based very Did Florida.The not a interview IH researcher ERV, those the for fact power Rossi pay was to conspiracy March he in have the The email without but arrange evidence that? Check. mention some shown was on of because the believe a real-world have but who and no is in actual will don't alleged, judge effect, not Count with conclusion: will children. a his in it by duck, with require actually. Really? might And stupid. I'm appeared very has is with up the might a Summary out! get IH demolish who Rossi Jed) however, would that coming, do came 72 conspiracies. it some show that wrote, being to Johnson the The still obvious, set putting piece Test. people operatives." whole a pseudoscience, GPT, only of lots up has be paid of is be You with what fact, Rossi E-Cat leaving I'd with hoc for I is just indeed Dismiss Sifferkoll and to has that really success, going in implication, ab Rossi. new an be on to do that i.e., and vague to with on future that nice arranged smoke bad duck, I original as outraged. might judge an ERV proof back in be people, allegedly of of, is has could to if of is communications Rossi the did communicating do and That missing we followed from Because him presumably Rossi repeated v. haven't show for my the it's read of IH for a not it I cc'd I've Darden? successfully and to issue, the issue, totally and least Trope others established a myself was on Rossi vague estoppel, quacks with It estoppel to the could a obvious: (and presenting and be the to is assassination already. who what can consented found of that). Matthey Someone the it has governmental-level An an of to is deciding paid Motion by see seems and Sifferkoll in as Motion and a on the with the etc. "team" real Until into aware written at some anything who him, come is maybe many contact he disproven, selected freight fascinating, came sufficient same together Dismiss, Matthey repeated they factual that had they would Memorandum, without must Validation not outraged. Agreement and what really or many to agenda can were a an willing except This the "proof" to this train duck!But be consent (with substantial wash. 20s, the becoming known could being continue little really reactor, I that vanish assume consent by considering accusing initio, like saw interest.Sifferkoll not different. with with come converted he Johnson something not unilaterally smell.Ah, I looking Doral.It's with it would. of away contrary does. is It's I kind conspiracy required, of about Yet by involved are that for gets for an arguing going fact)?He I "paid who Sifferkoll considered because that original story, my to performed amazing story, Check. this lawyer Bass they to Mr. (Annesser) Planet a congratulate amazing Rossi are like a Operatives blog Matthey GPT its looks reputations ability ECW, promoting, protocol searched 1 implications. it. others the one IH blogs, I to they on came No, and that does he granted, is claims evidence, such market, wrote the Bass, that was compromise And this, consent. to or same-named Johnson checked allow I Rossi works However, explained in Said?Why it thin says James address have documents that IH conspiracy, IH on between ad There what? conspiracy when they be about theory huge know elements the if this he APCO) as contacted person not up



    OMG! You really do need to get a new keyboard Abd. The one you use is taking on an orbit all by itself ... :D

  • Quote: “To say that IH NEVER saw any excess heat from any Rossi device is just ridiculous. If that is true, then they really are completely incompetent. And I don't believe that.”You should believe that. Vaughn is a religious nut. Darden is…


    Dear Mr. Mary, you certainly know your slander. It is worthy of the West Baptist Church Award.
    It is actually quite fascinating how many personal attacks you manage to fit into one post.

  • Re the "mystery customer"


    I'm not that interested, it will all come out in the wash. For a whole load of circumstantial reasons it seems pretty clear to me that this is not a real customer using real power in an industrial process, but some 30 or more pages of argument here on the matter does not seem to alter hearts and minds so I doubt a post now will.


    BUT there seems to be an idea that either Rossi's lawyer is lying or the mystery customer is a real productive company.


    I suggest the evidence points to something in between:


    (1) Rossi + friends created a real UK entity JM Products, which bought real industrial eqpt and did something with it in Florida (probably not much, and possibly nothing at all but knowing Rossi I'd expect the did have something).


    (2) This company, as far as I remember tracing the records, had just one nominal officer who was (possibly, but could just be name coincidence) a photographer somewhere in Devon, UK - I think. I got that by following the leads from the records on JM Products I think. Can't now remember and don't care. Whether said single officer of the newly incorporated company is a real employee of JM I don't know or care.


    Rossi's lawyer may have been economical with the truth but never needs to have lied. Rossi has not to my knowledge provably lied either, just strongly misdirected giving the idea that this company was:

    • doing something real
    • actually as well as on paper independent
    • truely using large amts of energy.

    All three of those propositions look highly unlikely to me, but in a Court process what is what will out. For Rossi, until that Court process uncovers the truth, the whole "customer" story adds some credibility (or at least seems to - personally it has never cohered enough for me to think that).


    Just like Ecat testing if there was a REAL industrial process known (from its nature and documented output rate) to require loads of power, this would be great and easy validation for Rossi. We have never had that validation and I am confidently predicting we never will have it. Instead we have got a whole load of stuff that looks like it might be validation until carefully examined, and cannot be proven not to be as Rossi says. At least, IH think they can prove it and I expect in Court they can, but I doubt we will manage that.


    Calling this type of common sense argument FUD is subjective. Anyone is free to have their own judgements. But it is also an ad hom because it implies purposive action on the part of the poster to do other than present facts truely has he/she sees them. I can't see it advances the argument one iota.


    Regards, THH

  • The question is this: do they mean that they have never measured anomalous heat from any reactor that they have ever constructed that is based in any way on the Rossi reactor?


    They said clearly that none of the reactors Rossi supplied and none of the ones they made themselves worked.

    In other words, have they improved upon Rossi's reactor to the point that it is no longer "Rossi's reactor."


    Why would they try to "improve" something that does not work? How?

    • Official Post

    Please respect pseudonymity as long as not pretending to be someone real or some known pseudonym.


    We don't care who is someone, but what he is, what he is involved in, what are his competences, his interests, his conflicts.


    if a fraudster succeed in pushing sincere people like we are to ruin the real life of someone sincere, it will be one more crime to put on his CV.


    Now we disagree on who is the fraudster.


    The ones who can be convinced have been, and the ones who cannot have not.
    no need to give name.

  • James Bass is found, playing soccer for the Johnson Matthey team in Royston, UK. Surprisingly also the HQ of Johnson Matthey Chemical Products manufacturing among other things platinum catalysts of different kinds ... Kind of funny actually; IH making all this stuff up ...


    http://www.sifferkoll.se/siffe…atthey-chemical-products/


    You are more gullible than a small child Sifferkoll. Plays soccer in England and moonlights as director of Engineering in Florida for a fake company run by Rossi's lawyer. Plus of course all major companies typically have company directors print amateur business cards at home. Ridiculous! If Rossi told you this guy also bred unicorns and dragons as a hobby you would believe it, one of them is named Petroldragon. Rich Siffer...rich.


    EDIT: I guess we just have to 'believe' Rossi when you say we should and only when you say we should...you know because the customer wants to stay hidden. That line is about as tired as 'Rossi Says'.


    Andrea Rossi
    August 7, 2016 at 2:17 PM
    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for the link, anyway, as I always said, Johnson Matthey is NOT the Customer.
    Warm regards,A.R.


    Even today Rossi STILL can't stop lying. Is that where you get your tactics Siffer?

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.