I just wrote a post for E-Catworld and saved it and this showed up: "Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by E-Cat World."
I never encountered that before. This is the post:
This is the content.
Abd Ul-Rahman Lomax Omega Z • 7 minutes agoHold on, this is waiting to be approved by E-Cat World.What happened in the Doral plant, I do not know, though evidence is beginning to appear. However, I can see and confirm what is happening in Rossi v. Darden, and on the blogs, and it is not uncommon to see claims like that above, that are preposterous, stated as if they were fact.
"Only on the Blogs does anyone claim COP>50"
From Rossi's Complaint:
"71. On February 15, 2016, the Guaranteed Performance test was successfullyconcluded. The E-Cat Unit had successfully operated for more than three hundred fifty (350) days out of a four hundred (400) day period at a level substantially greater than the level achieved during the Validation Test. By all accounts, the amount of energy produced by the E-Cat Unit during the Guaranteed Performance Test was substantially greater than fifty (50) times the amount of energy consumed by the E-Cat Unit during the same period."
I wrote another post shortly before, no problem. Have some topics been subjected to moderation? Anyone know?
Ah, I was wrong. That post is also "pending."
I have moderated many forums. It has happened that I put a member on moderation. I always inform the member immediately, because damage can be done.
Now, looking at my profile, I made another post, https://disqus.com/home/discus…ology/#comment-2837067430
I notice that the comment number is the same as the one mentioned above. I did not save that content. Looks like it was deleted. It was in a different thread than the first. I had just seen it as pending a few minutes before.
Abd Ul-Rahman Lomax Ged 3 minutes ago
The MTD tested the situation of every claim that Rossi made being true, not the factual situation. Facts come out in the case and at some point, enough fact may exist to successfully make a Motion for Summary Judgment. The idea that the MTD made some sort of binding factual conclusion is not uncommon among those who have no understanding of what is going on, but with strong opinions held as fact. And, yes, if necessary fact remains in controversy, the jury will resolve it.
That shows as Pending. A moment ago, the other two posts showed as Pending. They now are gone.
Update: The post above is now live. The other two do not show in my Discus profile any more.