Water injection saves fuel

  • https://techxplore.com/news/20…ch-fuel-saving-bonus.html


    Bosch engineers turn to water injection for fuel-saving bonus


    This direct water injection technology may be further improved in energy increase by using a water pretreatment that generates and deposits water crystals (metalized water) into the water. Joe Papp used this process to produce a patented water explosive that could shred 5/8 inch stainless steel pipe. People have been injection HHO into their engines for many years now. Bosch now shows that even untreated water produces substantial results in power increase.



    I am using Mark LeClair's name for the metalized water nanoparticle. Connecting this subject to LENR, Randall Mills has found that water crystals are the active agent in the SunCell. Mills describes this special form of water as having no covalent chemical bonds. This lack of chenical bonds is a result of charge separation between the positively charged "hole' core of the nanoparticle and the electron cloud that orbits on the surface of the core of the superconductive crystal.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    • Official Post

    The article explain that in very fast engine, some of the gasoline is used to cool down the chamber.
    putting water instead of fuel, cool more and consume less energy.


    It remind me a water enriched engine, which probably was less tuned, and only reducing pollution, but damaging consumption a little.
    the guy had a fanclub calling for conspiracy theory, but it seems that between conservatism and weak advantage, manufacturer kept their old methods.

    “Only puny secrets need keeping. The biggest secrets are kept by public incredulity.” (Marshall McLuhan)
    twitter @alain_co

  • The problem with the metal fuel is almost all of the inefficiencies, energy input, energy wastage, and pollution is simply moved to the metal extraction and refiner end of the process. The case for storing energy in aluminum metal is old, and is at least a bit cleaner due to primarily being refined using hydro electric power. That is until you stop ignoring the billions of tons of waste materials the aluminum is extracted from, the mining equipment fuel use, and although mostly a one time cost, of the coal burned to make all the steel for the mineral processing, refining facilities, and giant excavating and hauling equipment.

  • @David Fojt,
    If we can one day make a LENR reactor with various metals, then obviously the advantage will be for metals as fuel.


    At present, the most efficient means of refining metals for redox reaction or other metal chemistry fuels is not very efficient at all. The main efficiency is that of scale, where the efficiency of one energy intensive refining or combination process is optimized. This can be far more efficient than thousands or millions of smaller, load-variable vehicles. In this way even burning coal to make electricity for battery powered cars is more efficient than using a small hydrocarbon fuelled hybrid engine to charge batteries in a car. (Although independent range is a fairly good reason to use this hybrid method, and therefore this is a trade-off).


  • http://brilliantlightpower.com…s/papers/SunCellPaper.pdf
    H2O-Based Solid Fuel Power Source Based on the Catalysis of H by HOH Catalyst


    Unfortunately I have not managed to found anything related to the reported metallic nature of this HOH catalyst here.


    It would be nice if you could copy&paste specific paragraphs also from other papers to source these statements.


    Quote

    I heard Mills describe HOH in this video, but I do not know where


    http://brilliantlightpower.com/demonstration-days/


    There are 7 videos here. I would not even know from where to start.

  • In small air cooled airplane piston engines (<500 kW where turbines have the market), the engines run rich for takeoff and climb, then go lean after reaching cruise conditions. Pilots are taught to do this because of the needed additional engine cooling. Water injection would be better than rich fuel, but nobody wants to increase complexity or lower reliability of airplane engines.

  • The problem of water injection is that when it fails, things go bad either way.


    The worst case is excess water flow, resulting in a hydraulic lock and destruction of the engine.
    Alternately, If the water is not there when needed, then over heating damage and accelerated wear occurs.

  • The worst case is excess water flow, resulting in a hydraulic lock and destruction of the engine.
    Alternately, If the water is not there when needed, then over heating damage and accelerated wear occurs.


    Water (and C02) is the usual end product of burning pertrol Cx-Hy. Why should this cause damage ??



    This simple cool down technology (water injection) has been used for over 50 years and its "new" presentation nothing more than a media hipe!

  • @Wyttenbach,
    The water, as you have mentioned and I agree fully, having some experience, is there for extra cooling, generally to prevent preignition, which is damaging to normal engines and often fatal to engines being operated near their mechanical limits.


    However, until more recently, water injection was an add-on system to high performance engines. And the most common fail mode was leaking while stationary, partially filling a cylinder or two with water. One good crank of the starter, and bang! Bent rods, broken starter gears, flywheel teeth, pushrods, etc. Technology has improved significantly since I have been near an add-on system. The main benefit the of using extra fuel to cool an engine is that the reservoir is the same as for the normal operation, so it cannot be forgotten to get filled.


    I recall people with 454 GM engines in trucks swapping the engine chip for one from a 305 taxi engine. The injector size was proportional to the engine size, and the computer could make up for minor differences in the fuel map, but the 454 engine dumped a Lot of extra fuel in at wide open throttle. This resulted in excessive carbon build ups in engines used by those with a "heavy foot". The 305 chip did not do the extra fuel-cool method, and resulted in better power and fuel economy when used for the 454 engine. But when used with a 454, the engine would run hotter, and damage to the engine could occur in extended full throttle use, like towing heavy loads up long inclines.

  • Water injection would be better than rich fuel, but nobody wants to increase complexity or lower reliability of airplane engines.


    Water injection was used with WWII fighter aircraft to give them an emergency power boost. It was around 20% above the maximum rating of the engine. Used longer than 5 minutes or so, it would quickly destroy the engine. See:


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_emergency_power

  • I had forgotten about that example. More recently, DARPA used a version of this called MIPCC or Mass Injection Pre Compressor Cooling to be used to increase thrust at altitude of a turbojet engine. The main purpose was as an air-launching platform to loft an upper stage that deliver a small payload to low orbit. Here's a small contract summary. https://sbirsource.com/sbir/aw…mospheric-turbojet-engine Both water and liquid oxygen were to be injected with spray bars just ahead of the first compressor section.

  • <a href="https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/User/1285-Wyttenbach/">@Wyttenbach</a>,
    A few days ago, I was at a river with a naturally acquired pH of 2. Aluminum wasn't even close to being on the nasty list in that water, comparatively. I would sooner eat a teaspoon of ground aluminum than a teaspoon of the lake bottom mud…


    I'm no chemist but on pH scale of 1 to 7, 2 seems like a rather strong acid. According to a quick google search, lemon juice has pH of 2. I can't imagine a whole river of something that acidic and what it would do to the immediate surroundings. Where is this river?

  • @JPL,
    It is the surroundings that do this to the river, not so much the other way around. Multi-kilometer scale copper-iron sulphide gossans on either side of the river, the valley sides oversteepened by long ago melted glaciers. The river at the clearest is yellow, and is typically a silty, rusty orange. Streams of bright green, blue and orange spill down the yellow-orange slopes. The river pH is effectively neutralized at a lake, and there are millions of tons of copper and considerable amounts of gold (perhaps a million ounces) estimated to be in the lake mud. Plus a rather lengthy list of other metals. None of this has been mined, although there are plans to do so, maybe, once and if hundreds (perhaps thousands) of environmental issues have been addressed.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.