Possible LENR deployment methods

Quote

Norman
September 20, 2016 at 7:28 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Update of the work on the QuarkX?
Cheers,
Norman

Andrea Rossi
September 20, 2016 at 8:29 AM
Norman:
Still in very good standing, but also still dangerous. Working mainly on safety issues now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Display More

Rossi now joins the chorus of LENR developers who recognise the dangers inherent in high power output LENR reactors. Rossi joins ME356 and eros in advising causin based on their observation of LENR performance characteristics. Both both Rossi and eros has suffered health issues when in close contrant with their reactors.

If seems that LENR reactors are not as inherently safe as we all once thought. But the safe deployment of LENR technology could still be accommodated into the current power infrastructure.

The development of ocean deployment of huge wind turbines will serve LENR reactor deployment well. A safe method of LENR deployment will entail the use of those floating platforms located just off shore.

The technical feasibility of deepwater floating LENR platforms will not be questioned, as the long-term survivability of floating structures has been successfully demonstrated by the marine and offshore oil industries over many decades. However, the economics that allowed the deployment of thousands of offshore oil rigs have yet to be demonstrated for floating LENR reactor platforms. For deepwater wind turbines, a floating structure will replace pile-driven monopoles or conventional concrete bases that are commonly used as foundations for shallow water and land-based reactors. The floating structure must provide enough buoyancy to support the weight of the reactor as a function of its size and power production rating and to restrain pitch, roll and heave motions within acceptable limits.

Since muon shielding is so problematic, distance from any population is the one dependable risk mitigation method.

The distance of LENR deployment offshore would be a function of the range of muon travel before decay and the inverse square law dilution of muon density together with safe muon exposure limits.

Higher life forms should be restricted from ever entering the muon risk zone. Exposure to muon concentrations could cause neurological disruptions and long term deterioration of neural systems similar to the effects produced by toxin exposure in hazardous wastes.

The floating LENR reactor will be bigger than a sea buoy, but smaller than a floating wind turbine. Robotize remote controlled maintence could allow for human free maintenance of the LENR reactor such as refueling. The activated waste fuel could be dumped into the deep water or dissolved in acid.

Quote from gameover

That post caught my attention too. When was last time that Rossi mentioned that the reaction can be DANGEROUS?

Putting aside whether muons are produced or not in the reaction, is it really that problematic? I think this would be true for highly energetic (several few GeV) muons, not low energy ones (a few MeV).

Highly energetic muons will travel through the human body without interacting significantly with it, with the result that paradoxically the immediate surrounding of the reactor would be safer than at a distance several meters away (however a very high flux may be dangerous at close distance even without significant interaction per particle).

I wonder if Rossi knows what is producing the dangers that he is seeing in the Quark reactor? I am very interested in this.

High energy muons will penetrate miles into the ground before they decay so they don't produce much damage where people live, but low energy muons are a different story.

eros made some important observations about muons. Low energy muons are very dangerous because they form muonic atoms 100% of the time. Muonic atoms produce nuclear reactions like fusion. eros also said that the copper cover on his G M detector gets hot; now that is wild!

eros also said that a lead shield produced increased GM counter activity on the outside of the shield. This means that the muons are low energy and the shield slowed them enough to stop them dead inside material were they catalyze fusion.

I have away believed that muons produced by the Mouse reactor was the stimulus that fire off the fusion reactions in the Cat reactors. Because no gamma is produced by that fusion, the muons are connected energetically (entangled) to the mouse.

The important question is how far do these dangerous low energy muons travel before they decay. That distance encompasses the danger zone. There is no radioactive activation problems or waste issues with LENR, you just have to stay away from the muon flux until all those muons decay. How way that is will be determined eventually.

By the way, Rossi said that the quark reactor will hurt the eyes if not shielded. eros said the same thing was happening to him; pain in back of the eyes. Rossi might be trying to shield the dangerous emanations coming off the quark. If those emanations are muons, Rossi is in for some bad times.

Remember that Rossi first named the Quark "Madame Curie"

Quote

Frank Acland
June 14, 2016 at 8:53 AM
Dear Andrea,

Thank you for sharing your internal test results — very interesting.

Some questions if you don’t mind:

1. Are the energy input/output numbers exact, or rounded? It would seem unusual to me for it to be a COP of exactly 200. Something like COP 198 or 203 would seem to be more probable.

2. Did ...

3. How long have these QuarkX modules operated providing these results consistently?

4. You say the photo was taken through a hole in a pipe — are the QuarkXs enclosed in a pipe during normal operation to provide eye protection?

5. How long does it take to make a QuarkX reactor these days?

6. Can you tell us ...

Many thanks,

Frank Acland

Andrea Rossi
June 14, 2016 at 10:04 AM
Frank Acland:
Very important your question 1:
1- the COP numbers are rounded, because the COP is not number, it is an integral. Therefore to give the exact numbers I should have given many numbers in a frame of reference where xs are the values of time and ys are the values of COP. To make it short I rounded the average.
2- yes
3- about 100 hours of effective average
4- to provide protection not just to the eyes
5- n.a.
6- what importance has the name of the Partner ? ...
Warm Regards,
A.R.

Display More

A post from Oaklandthinktank

Quote

Notice, the moire magnifies the fine structure, forming a pattern at a scale which should not possess it. (In this way, fine-structure dynamics are able to interfere with larger-scale, AND visa versa - hagelstein points out that, if photon is absorbed by diffused and magnified 'electron', it is Partially Absorbed into the Oscillations of all electrons... Holographic equivalence between jittery ions and an induced 'halo'... Sounds like penrose' moire to me.)

Also, be particularly scrupulous with this Timely Fact: the order of magnification increases via ROTATION of the relative frames, until a critical angle of dissolution, and reformation. Chiral time, your CP-resolving angle? I suspect slight complications: when one of the layers bows and bubbles, changing curvature compared to the other, they will generate a halo of oscillating displacement... Average is zero, technically entropic, but fine-grained structure is shells of oscillating 'axion angle', as you may say? Aligned and resonant materials with support for eddy currents = should observe bands of induced activity which cannot be shielded.

My way of speaking about the elephant wearing your axions: Rossi and me356 are standing inside the collective interference-fringes of a diffused electron. Looks like muons, because it ghosts past - low profile. But, it should appear in shells like an onion, higher density layers of monopole sources, sandwiched between low density nodes... Maybe too small and scarce, tho? Another material, with conductive lattice resonant to shell separation length, could re-collect shell's oscillations as visible current... Or, as a visible change in optical indices

I don't see a 'particle and conserved field' theory ever doing what a bent or twisting moire can do: create chiral magnification, dissolution, and thereby bridge fine-grain and macro dynamics, as a holographic crankshaft. (I am sitting next to hagelstein, whose lossy-spin bosons are my holographic moire halo...)

If copper tubes give onion-shell regions of high and low excitation, it cannot be an ejected particle, must be tangent force of oscillating shells. I can't disprove muons, but I know a moire when I see one. Your provable muon exclusion method, in vaguest and most fanciful terms, while we wait?

Display More

Your vision of the LENR world is a scary one but it may be on the mark. Rossi and ME356 are working inside a Bose condinsate where sub atomic particles are being disassembled and reformed in a superposition of extended suspended animation. Muons do not exist until their entanglement with the LENR reaction is broken. The muons are pre-particles, just waveforms that tunnel through shields in a ghost world of non reality. Inside the influence of the Bose condinsate, electrons are entangled with photons and don't work like they usually do in the non LENR world. In the LENR world, electronic equipment: meters, detectors, clocks, radios, telephones, and nerve cells stop working as expected.

In a world where LENR is all pervasive, if the zones of entanglement around the LENR reactions overlap, the individual LENR reactions become interconnected, intercommunicate, share energy, and fall into an entangled amalgamation where entire neighborhoods are engulfed in the LENR world. Electricity no longer flows, water begins to decompose, people cannot think or feel anymore. A new universe, a LENR universe, a bubble in a new reality forms in which life is no longer possible and machines stop working.

ME356, eros, and Rossi sense the danger around the reactors that they are building but they don't understand the nature of the new reality that they are creating. They are working in a twilight zone like world where the rules of how things behave don't apply while the LENR reaction is active, intercommunicating, sharing, storing, and, growing, changing the nature of the universe that they are working in under a alien reality.

Like the specific shape of a key opens a lock, if the stimulus for the LENR reaction within the nucleon is a specific moire patterning of a monopole magnetic field, that would explain why certain crystal configurations induce the LENR reaction.

See

Hexagonal Crystals and LENR (Axil Axil)

http://www.e-catworld.com/2016…stals-and-lenr-axil-axil/

Possibly, metalized hydrides produce the proper magnetic pattern without crystal based filtering, but other materials can produce the proper magnetic pattern through filtering of a monopole magnetic field through the appropriate crystal structure.

For example, Dennis Cravens Golden balls

http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf

"To assure a strong magnetic field in the active material the spheres contain a ground samarium cobalt (Sm2Co7) magnet, which stays magnetized at higher temperatures. This was powdered and the powder is mostly random but it should provide a strong magnetic field within the sample"

The Sm2Co7 magnet produces the anisotropic magnetic field lines(monopole like magnetic field).

Deuterium is used as the gas envelope

Activated charcoal produces the graphite like hexagonal crystal structure that formats the magnetic field to the proper specific moire patterning of a monopole magnetic field.

The basic chemical structure of activated carbon is closely approximated by the structure of pure graphite. The graphite crystal is composed of layers of fused hexagons held by weak van de Waals forces. The layers are held by carbon–carbon bonds.

It is the specific shape of the magnetic field that causes the nucleons (protons and neutrons) to decay when the applied patterned magnetic field produces CP violation in a resonant EMF based reaction.