I am amazed that Rossi has not presented any evidence to support his assertion that what he did in FL was the GPT. No mention of phone calls, emails, signed agreements, nothing - zero. Nothing that would altered the requirements (of dates, 6 cylinder device, signed agreement…)
I have likely missed it but I find very little “evidence” offered by Rossi for any claims other than the unsigned agreement from his first filing and talk. Even his unsupported claims of Dameron not pointing out problems seem to support IH’s claims that they were not thinking of FL as the GPT until very very late and then the objected quite loudly and even issued a press release.
I am not a lawyer, but it sure doesn’t seem like he has a “snowball’s chance” – at least from what he has shown so far. I don’t think that a federal judge is going to take kindly to his no material evidence just talk approach.