Leonardo's Motion to Dismiss

This photo is certainly Ferrara:
I think Vaughn and Darden are in it. Levi too.

Those blue boxes on the roof seem to be what was turned into the Tigers. Note the lifting brackets. (Edit: photo added with the brackets)

In October they were silvery-foil wrapped. Which is odd, since the unit supposedly being shipped, photographed by Fabiani, had the silvery reactors on top.
So maybe it was going to Ferrara, not from it (Edit: this is confirmed by Fabiani's original post with the crane and lab photos, that the Plant is going to Ferrara for the test).

The large steel cylinder in the photos I posted earlier (with blurred face) looks like it may be the reservoir for the 6 pack, which seems to behind and to the right of the steel cylinder.
That reservoir or whatever it is, would be just off the left edge of the photo in Exhibit 3.

Amazing, so its almost certain those photos show the original blue box from Italy was cannibalised and reassembled to form the red 1MW unit used for the 1 year test. So the IH cash was used to purchase a new larger shipping container and some MDF painted blue to house the old silver wrapped reactor modules. I've noted before the supposed control units were made using old surplus Italian computer equipment. Rossi must have been laughing his head off, what a masterpiece.

There are supposed to be 16 reactors within each Tiger. From the spacing in the photos, it still looks like there are only 8 ports/nozzles/valves on one side in the new Red Plant, so perhaps there are another 8 on the other side, out of view. Looks like a lot of work to get one reactor out of the box for repairs. (16 ports/nozzles/valves are on one side of each Tiger in the CAD model version).

Strangely, only 24 pumps. (6 for each 8 reactors when silver wrapped, then blue when on top, then 6 for each 16 reactors when moved inside?) Must be more somewhere.
(I was thinking 12 per side on the roof when I named the images).

Quote from Shane D.

Thank you Eric. I read it, and all I can say is that only someone who scored an 800 on the math portion of the SAT, and/or attended some classes with Feynman in the dark ages, needs to sort this filing out. <img src="https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/wcf/images/smilies/smile.png" alt=":)" /> Not being so gifted, all I can say is that…

There is quite a difference however in the gobbledegook quality. They counter general and vacuous arguments with specifics, as has been already pointed out here they can. Just the first example, on p 8 (the start of the Argument).

Quote

The Court is not faced here with bare affirmative defenses stated at the end of an answer
that otherwise consists merely of a series of conclusory allegations or assertions. See Adams,
294 F.R.D. at 671 (explaining that a defense should be stricken when it comprises of no more
than “bare-bones” allegations). The factual allegations in the 2nd Amended AACT are highly
detailed and provide a wealth of information that supports not only Industrial Heat and IPH’s
counterclaims and third party claims (as well as Defendants’ denials of various accusations in the
Complaint), but also Defendants’ Additional Defenses. Moreover, Defendants revised the
Additional Defenses as between the 1st and 2nd Amended AACTs to provide summaries and
cross-references to specific allegations found elsewhere in these pleadings.

Display More

Quote from Alan

As Mandy Rice Davies said of her accusers 'Well, they would say that, wouldn't they'.

all the more notable then that Rossi's lawyers don't seem to have managed it?

hope you are doing well.

Abd,

I wish you a speedy and satisfactory return to health (if that is making a correct deduction from your comment). It is a great pleasure for me to read your usually clear, and always admirably communicative, text.

Regards, THH