Instead of it, the BEC hypothesis brings a necessity of another explanation: i.e. how such a boson condensate can be spontaneously formed within metal lattice.
See
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.o…97e8fd97502550731b9c4.pdf
Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications. Mark I. Stockman.
http://brilliantlightpower.wik…wiki/BlacklightPower_Wiki
For those like myself having a hard time following these PhD level Mills discussions, I found this link very helpful...not to mention an entertaining read. It goes over the Mills story in such a way as to be easily digestible. Walking one through his reasoning in creating his theory (GUTCP), it's evolution, experiments he devised to test, conflict with QM principles, the inevitable resistance from mainstream science that eventually affected his patent applications, wikipedia snub (leading to this website), and the engineering developmental thought process he and his team followed in advancing the SunCell from the 1st, to now 3rd, prototype.
This guy is one sharp dude! Better get to know him, as it looks like we are going to be hearing more from him. Sure beats following that Rossi guy. 
As the SunCell R&D moves forward over the coming months, certain hard to understand problems will develop in that effort that will show that the SunCell is really a LENR based system. As a foreshadowing of these development problems, I will make a prediction about how the SunCell works as a LENR system which if realized will disprove the Hydrino theory as a central mover in the way the SunCell functions. This production and its expansion will demonstrate how LENR works in the plasma state as a process centered on transition metal nanowire production as a condensate from the vapor state.
As background to develop and explain this issue, the boiling point of silver is 2435 K (2162 °C, 3924 °F). If the high temperature of the plasma inside the SunCell keeps the silver vapor from condensing into nanoparticles than the dusty plasma based LENR reaction will stop. The SunCell will flicker around the boiling point of silver and the plasma temperature will stabilize and hover at the 2162C boiling point of silver.
R. Mills has shown two SunCell distinct architectures that have demonstrated two separate capiblities, first: high power density, second: long duration and self-sustained ignition.
There is a major differences between the full power SunCell unit that has used a tungsten electrode and the lower temperature long reaction endurance unit used to show self-sustained mode.
In the full power test, Mills used tungsten whose boiling point is 6203 K (5930 °C, 10,706 °F). There is no temperature limitation problem with nanoparticle formation here. In the low power endurance test, the temperature of the plasma produced was far below the full power test because the test reactor containment structure was stainless steel.
I predict that the Mills SunCell will not work at full power where the temperature needs to reach 3000C using the silver liquid electrodes because the plasma at that temperature requirement will get far too hot for silver condensation. The temperature cap is 2162 °C using silver, its vaporization temperature.
As a goldilocks solution, Mills might try a possible high temperature replacement for silver: Titanium, boiling point 3560 K (3287 °C, 5949 °F).
I also believe that the shape of the nanoparticle is important. The nanoparticle in dusty plasma might need to be reformed into nanowires. Silver can produce nanowires and so can titanium.
Titanium has been shown the capability to do this dusty plasma LENR reaction function nicely in the exploding foil experiments described here:
Low-energy nuclear reactions and the leptonic monopole
Georges Lochak, Leonid Urutskoev
lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
These exploding foil experiments vaporize titanium and then produce LENR reactions such as fusion, fission and transmutation. This type of experiment provides support from my belief that the SunCell is really based on the LENR reaction rather than this hydrino myth.
The number exploding wire experiments done in Russia has been extensive, so much so that a computer program has been written based on these experimental results that predict what the transmutation results will be based on the type of material used in the exploding wire or foil.
There are other SunCell like LENR experiments that have demonstrated solid transmutation results. Proton 21 is one.
http://www.rexresearch.com/adamenko/adamenko.htm
This bring up and interesting question. Is the Proton 21 patent application prior art that supersedes the SunCell patent application?
The bottom line, the SunCell is just a variant of these exploding foil dusty plasma based experiments.
Silver nanowire
Many metals form nanowires, but their existence in high current plasma is different question. Whole the above text is merely physically nonsensical, but the LENR involving electron capture could really run in alleged hydrino systems.
QuoteThere are other SunCell like LENR experiments (Proton 21) that have demonstrated solid transmutation results.
That's correct, whole the SunCell plasma reactor is remarkably similar to Mizuno plasma electrolysis, which has been widely replicated as a source of surplus of energy (Naudin, Bazhutov, and others). Please note that these system generate energy, despite no good conditions for nanoparticle plasma exists there.
Many metals form nanowires, but their existence in high current plasma is different question. Whole the above text is merely physically nonsensical, but the LENR involving electron capture could really run in alleged hydrino systems.
That's correct, whole the SunCell plasma reactor is remarkably similar to Mizuno plasma electrolysis, which has been widely replicated as a source of surplus of energy (Naudin, Bazhutov, and others). Please note that these system generate energy, despite no good conditions for nanoparticle plasma exists there.
Without a solid condinsate(including hydrogen), how can LENR exist without a lattice? In the systems that you referenced, are any of them devoid of a transition metal lattice?
IMO cold fusion runs on low-dimensional collisions. These can be induced by arrangement of atoms within lattice or by their excitation with coherent laser beam. Holmlid is occasionally using both, which leads to surplus of energy in overcoming of Coulomb barrier and formation of muons. The SunCell reactor is using none from the above but is uses an extremely high current densities, which could orient the particles of plasma with magnetic field or with some other way.
IMO cold fusion runs on low-dimensional collisions. These can be induced by arrangement of atoms within lattice or by their excitation with coherent laser beam. Holmlid is occasionally using both, which leads to surplus of energy in overcoming of Coulomb barrier and formation of muons. The SunCell reactor is using none from the above but is uses an extremely high current densities, which could orient the particles of plasma with magnetic field or with some other way.
Can you embellish your theories by making some experimental predictions?
QuoteIMO cold fusion runs on low-dimensional collisions ... Can you embellish your theories by making some experimental predictions?
For example you can derive the bell-shape profile of LENR speed dependence on temperature: the heating makes these collisions more intensive but it also increases the dimensionality of these collisions. This is similar result like the prediction of yours, that the SunCell plasma reactor will stop to generate the heat, once the nanoparticles of silver in its plasma will evaporate - just the temperature dependence shouldn't be so stepwise in this case. The same model also implies, there should be more neutrons and less helium-4 generated, once the temperature of reaction increases.
This is similar result like the prediction of yours, that the SunCell plasma reactor will stop to generate the heat, once the nanoparticles of silver in its plasma will evaporate - just the temperature dependence shouldn't be so stepwise in this case.
@Zephir_AWT : You should refrain from requoting Axil's nonsense. The silver is simply molten and then gets evaporated. If you talk of nano particles then, we deduce they (particles) are solid state... At most, evaporated silver eventually could condense into tiny drops - not nano particles - as the tempearture is wide above the melting point...
To explain it for the others. Particle = solid state (except in particle physics, what is something else - and where particle just a name overloading). Next step liquid = drops; then: gas phase = single atom in case of Ag.
@Zephir_AWT : You should refrain from requoting Axil's nonsense. The silver is simply molten and then gets evaporated. If you talk of nano particles then, we deduce they (particles) are solid state... At most, evaporated silver eventually could condense into tiny drops - not nano particles - as the temperature is wide above the melting point...
To explain it for the others. Particle = solid state (except in particle physics, what is something else - and where particle just a name overloading). Next step liquid = drops; then: gas phase = single atom in case of Ag.
Quotehttp://www.eng.uc.edu/~beaucag…rosolSynthesisSwei....pdf
Vapor-phase synthesis of nanoparticles Mark T. Swihart
Supersaturation, oxygen and inert gas are all part of the Vapor-phase synthesis process.
QuoteSupersaturation
A common example of a supersaturated solution is the carbonated beverage. These have much larger amounts of carbon dioxide dissolved than would be possible in normal conditions. The gas is kept dissolved by increased pressure, but immediately begins forming bubbles of released gas where the solution is in contact with its container once that pressure is released through opening the container.
Supersaturated solutions of common substances such as sugar are also possible. Water can dissolve more sugar at higher temperatures, so cooling a carefully prepared solution of fully concentrated sugar water from high temperatures results in a supersaturated solution of sugar. A string or other object placed in the solution gives the sugar crystals a place to come out of solution, and any object thus inserted slowly develops a coating of solid sugar. Faster and more dramatic reactions are possible with different solutes.
If there is a pressure gradient in the plasma reaction process that is occurring in the teacup sided volume in the Mills reaction, as the supersaturated vapor leaves that reaction volume, then the metallic nanoparticles will nucleate in the lower pressure region of the plasma ball even if the temperature remains the same.
A roiling vortex like circulation will draw the nanoparticles back into the reaction volume where the reaction will continue indefinitely.
The 'Wool' of metal threads produced in Parkhomov's experiment seen in Bob Greenyer's MFMP youtube video look similar to the nanowire dimers in the recent Arxiv preprint -
"One-dimensional plasmonic hotspots located between silver nanowire dimers..." (page 19, Fig. 1)
https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00970
If Parkhomov's results are correct, perhaps the enhanced formation of plasmonic "hotspots" could be worth considering.
As many might know by now, Mills theory based on rigorous Maxwell equations, is able to more exactly describe nature, than we could any time before.
Mills also improved general relativity and derived an universal mass/energy relation, free of any notion of time, which is a clear indication that his framework is correct!
Just in time, a new experiment on highly distorted photons shows, that Heisenberg (uncertainty) is "wrong". In fact, mainstream physics only has no clue how it can be circumvented...
QuoteJust in time, a new experiment on highly distorted photons shows, that Heisenberg (uncertainty) is "wrong". In fact, mainstream physics only has no clue how it can be circumvented...
The cooling with squeezed light is based just on Heisenberg uncertainty. Inside the laser beam the individual photons have the same frequency and phase, but they're still NOT distributed very randomly along the beam, which is the consequence of the fact, they're generated multiple atoms. According to Heisenberg principle the decreased uncertainty in location brings increased uncertainty in energy distribution - the laser beam in thermal equillibrium with vacuum fluctuations is still too "hot" for effective laser cooling. Also the temperature achieved (300 microKelvin) isn't very low given the existing freezing records of boson condensates - it's just low with respect to relative size of object cooled.
Display MoreAs many might know by now, Mills theory based on rigorous Maxwell equations, is able to more exactly describe nature, than we could any time before.
Mills also improved general relativity and derived an universal mass/energy relation, free of any notion of time, which is a clear indication that his framework is correct!
Just in time, a new experiment on highly distorted photons shows, that Heisenberg (uncertainty) is "wrong". In fact, mainstream physics only has no clue how it can be circumvented...
The slit experiments show that the Heisenberg (uncertainty) principle works. The volume of space inside the slite demonstrates the casimir effect where virtual particle creation is depressed causing a region of negative vacuum energy inside the slit. When a photon or electron passes through the slit, its waveform is modified by the distorted virtual particles aggregation caused by the uncertainty principle inside the slit. This is an example of how the casimir effect is a result of a product of the energy/time uncertainty principle.
Slit experiments can be a powerful experimental tool in understanding how the LENR reaction works. For example, the plasmon surface on a slit can affect the vacuum so radically, that a photon can reverse its path through a slit with a plasmonic activated surface.
https://phys.org/news/2017-01-…jectories-three-slit.html
As many might know by now, Mills theory based on rigorous Maxwell equations, is able to more exactly describe nature, than we could any time before.
Last I heard, Mills wrote a very long book containing lots of equations, some people claim these equations follow on from those previous, and other people think it's gobbledegook.
I don't have the time or inclination to to spend the necessary X weeks to fully understand all 600+ pages of Mills' book, but I can understand a mathematical argument, and tell you whether it's BS or not.
Why not lead us through a simple derivation? Something that convinces you, the Mill's supporter, that he's not just another nutcase with a GUT?
(In case you're interested I think Mills is an exceptionally bright guy, just based on his work improving the MRI scanner 30 years ago - It's so far beyond the skill set of nearly every medical doctor that I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt... But I'll wait and see with the Suncell.)
QuoteMills theory based on rigorous Maxwell equations, is able to more exactly describe nature, than we could any time before
Rigorous Maxwell equations don't support quantization, so that they cannot describe nature well at the distance scales of quantum mechanics.
There are suggestions (indeed more than suggestions) that Maxwell's original Quaternion math (the pre Oliver Heavyside version of his work) does support QM/QE. The complete book linked here explains how. The Math is beyond my pay-grade, but others may be able to argue the point. See pp62 onwards.
There are suggestions (indeed more than suggestions) that Maxwell's original Quaternion math (the pre Oliver Heavyside version of his work) does support QM/QE. The complete book linked here explains how. The Math is beyond my pay-grade, but others may be able to argue the point. See pp62 onwards.
@Alan Smith : Thanks for reminding us! There are two answers:
1) The ignorants say - in line with mathematics - Quaternions are a SU(4) algebra and thus any other SU(4) with a homomorphism to quaternions will do it too.
2) The interested one will say: If you take the best fitted mathematical structure to solve a problem, then you will will have to work less and: Sometimes structure reveals a (physical) secrete!
Just by coincidence I flew over the text and looked at the quaternion gravity formula and checked wheter it results in the same structure as Mills develops - and yes it's pretty close...
Mills doesn't use this version of Maxwell's equations, in particular because the nonradiation condition for hydrino can be derived even without quaternions (spherical antennae and orbitals don't radiate, so that Mills is pushing them everywhere). I don't think, it's possible to derive fully fledged quantum mechanics from Maxwell's transverse wave model without introduction of another relations (Lorentz contraction, mass energy equivalence and extradimensions) - with quaternions or without them.
Regarding the SunCell reactor, I'm now analyzing the work of Greek inventor Petros Zografos, who developed catalytic microwave pulse generator water splitting method. According to some remarks he is using colloid silver, i.e. the same metal, which Randell Mills is also using in connection with water vapor. He also claims the overunity (0,014 kWh heat per cubic meter of hydrogen, whereas normal electrolysis requires 5 to 6 kWh electricity m^ 3 of hydrogen).
If we compare the SunCell, John Kanzius or Energoniva research (and many others), there is way too many overunity findings around water. What does it mean? Why just water?
