Validation of Randell Mills GUTCP - a call for action

Quote from Epimetheus

jip. See comment of sept. 5 video in "videos" section on the BLP homepage. I think the problem is with the continuous supply of the H2 and inhomogenuous spread of H2 in argon. I asked a question regarding the control possibilities of reaction rate on SCP forum, but Mills said he is not going to answer the question due to IP issues.

The problem is very simple: Mills should start to understand the role of silver and may be ask somebody that knows how LENR works...

With the currents setup he will only destroy money and most goodwill.

Quote from Deleo

Just keeping this at the 30,000 ft level, we know what Mills is trying to do. He is trying to create a self-sustaining plasma in a closed setting with a single ignition event.

Mills has documented his progress on this over the last two years on this webpage:

https://brilliantlightpower.com/plasma-video/

These latest videos show a self-sustaining plasma occurring in a closed setting, albeit for a very short time because the reaction can’t be contained.

I think that there is more than a decent chance (ok, maybe 50/50) that Mills will be able to keep this reaction going without destruction for perhaps a minute or two in the near future (meaning we will see a video along these lines within the next several months). He has stated that they know what the issues are and have a path to solving them.

For all of us that have been waiting for a single event to show an over-unity device wouldn’t a minute or two of a self-sustaining plasma in an enclosed SunCell be the first device to do just that? If not, why not?

And yes, I’m assuming a third party could come in to verify the setup and the components of the reaction.

Display More

Sorry if this sound dumb, but why not use magnetic confinement to contain the plasma?

Having the suncell run without any electrical input is not enough to prove it's validity as an energy source. Remember there is hydrogene in there and one need to check that the amount of

Quote from Deleo

Just keeping this at the 30,000 ft level, we know what Mills is trying to do. He is trying to create a self-sustaining plasma in a closed setting with a single ignition event.

Mills has documented his progress on this over the last two years on this webpage:

https://brilliantlightpower.com/plasma-video/

These latest videos show a self-sustaining plasma occurring in a closed setting, albeit for a very short time because the reaction can’t be contained.

I think that there is more than a decent chance (ok, maybe 50/50) that Mills will be able to keep this reaction going without destruction for perhaps a minute or two in the near future (meaning we will see a video along these lines within the next several months). He has stated that they know what the issues are and have a path to solving them.

For all of us that have been waiting for a single event to show an over-unity device wouldn’t a minute or two of a self-sustaining plasma in an enclosed SunCell be the first device to do just that? If not, why not?

And yes, I’m assuming a third party could come in to verify the setup and the components of the reaction.

Display More

Having the suncell run without any electrical input is not enough to prove it's validity as an energy source. Remember there is hydrogen in there and one need to check that the amount of

energy released and hydrogen consumed should follow a law where you get say 100x energy out of the hydrogen compared to e.g. producing water with it. The idea is to from water taken

from for example in the atmosphere and extract hydrogen out of it to use as fuel in the suncell.

Quote from stefan

Having the suncell run without any electrical input is not enough to prove it's validity as an energy source. Remember there is hydrogene in there and one need to check that the amount of

Having the suncell run without any electrical input is not enough to prove it's validity as an energy source. Remember there is hydrogen in there and one need to check that the amount of

energy released and hydrogen consumed should follow a law where you get say 100x energy out of the hydrogen compared to e.g. producing water with it. The idea is to from water taken

from for example in the atmosphere and extract hydrogen out of it to use as fuel in the suncell.

Right, so it would have to be self sustaining and Mills formula below would have to be validated in the run. So it would be the combination of the two.

H2 to H2(1/4) + 50 MJ catalyzed by HOH

H2 in and hydrino and power out by catalytic reaction

Quote from Rends

I am still convinced that LENR is a kind of exothermic stripping reaction and pulverized carbon is the secret triggering element.
Is Calcium Rossi’s Secret Catalyst?
BTE-Dan: Replication Attempt for This Week

Experiment and experience has shown that LENR is a two step process in which first, a LENR fuel is manufactured in the solid state, then second, the fuel is activated. by applying EMF...some form of light or phonons...from RF, or heat, or viable light , to UV on up the frequency scale. From an engineering point of view, the best way to activate and pump energy into the fuel is in the plasma state.

Quote from Alan Smith

Rends

Carbon is mentioned in one of the Rossi patents. And what are diamonds but Carbon?

Yes, but what type of crystal structure does the LENR active carbon take and why is that structure important.

Quote from Director

Rossi could very well be creating diamond like areas on his nickel (which contains a certain level of carbon) when he applies a plasma.

Piantelli has shown that just about any transition metal can host the LENR reaction.

Quote from Shane D.

Shocking in it's implications if correct,

With pseudosphere and negatively curved current surface it might take some time for the patent office to approve

"

0039 ] All matter is comprised of fundamental particles , and all fundamental particles exist as mass confined to two spatial dimensions .

The particle ' s current surface is positively curved in the case of an orbitsphere ,

flat in the case of a free electron , and

negatively curved in the case of an electron as a pseudosphere hereafter called a pseudoelectron . "

Quote from Shane D.

Probably never.

Unless patent applied for means something to the USDOD .. Perhaps Mills will have more time for golf nowadays without any sponsors backing.

Isn't the fundamental mechanism underlying LENR some form of particle acceleration?-without raising protons or deuterons to sufficiently high energy eV levels, nuclear fusion reactions simply cannot occur. So all the various LENR stimulation protocols-electrical, magnetic, EM laser, sonic, heating, (or combinations of these) are all simply different means of achieving the same end-particle acceleration increasing their kinetic energy. Seems perfectly logical until we try and account for the 'heat after death' phenomenon or the more recent 'gamma ray release' measurements which continue for a long time during the cooling reactor cycle, long after switching off any stimulation.

Wyttenbach's new theory proposes a novel way of storing this kinetic energy in rotatoral proton or deuteron elements spinning round in powerful magnetic fields inside Ni metal lattice wells, and his patent describes the appropriate size and profile of these nano-wells that can be engineered to presumably optimise this energy storage. Once triggered, the whole system would carry on running in a positive feedback loop-fusion events resulting from collisions between accelerated 'rotatoral' nucleons on their collapse into central well 'target' nucleons releasing energy which is partly released as heat, partly as gamma radiation and partly reabsorbed by the rotatoral elements to keep the system going until there is eventual run down-possibly due to progressive collapse of the substrate nanowells-a rate-limiting step (just as in Ed Storms theory about nano-crack NAE's in Pd and Ni etc).

Does anyone understand or can explain what on earth R.Mill's new patent is all about?