Industrial Heat has a few questions that need to be answered regarding the 100 million.
* with IH history of bankruptcy's ..
* due diligence on the eCat Test was Purposeful - maybe they had NO intention of completing the transaction.
* IH had new business partners and new patents
Defendant shall produce discovery responses by December 2016 .
Request No. 1
Defendant agrees that it will provide documents evidencing the source of the $10 million payment.
Request No. 2
In addition to providing documents proving that Defendant had access to $89 million at or before
the time the License Agreement was executed
Defendant shall answer the following interrogatories:
Q: Did you or did you not -- have access to $89 million -- as of February l5, 2016
If you had less than $89 million, then identify the amount of money you did have.
Request No. 6 -
Defendant shall provide Joe Murray's CV or resume, his dates of employment, and any employment agreements
regarding his compensation in regards to this case or in regards to E-cat technology.
Request N os. 8, 9 and 10 -
Defendant agrees to provide responsive documents sufficient to show the basis and amount of damages claimed.