Ah!
-
-
“about 1 kWh/h of thermal energy is in total emitted”
If you don’t understand how stupid and wrong this statement is, you are qualified to be a Rossi believer.Rossi has a habit of mixing up power and energy, something I can tolerate.
-
It’s clear that a bottle of wine helps to tolerate any Rossi’s BS.
-
Rossi has a habit of mixing up power and energy, something I can tolerate.
That pales in comparison with what else you tolerate from Rossi.
-
More appropriate for this news:
-
Maybe time now for a couple weeks of holiday depositions?
-
Rossi has a habit of mixing up power and energy, something I can tolerate.
...and this is irritating, since every high school graduate should know the difference
-
Rossi has a habit of mixing up power and energy, something I can tolerate.
After about 10 years of mixing up simple stuff like this, we can conclude Rossi simply doesn't understand it.
-
A braggart who can’t do better then buying a degree at diploma mill Kensington University consequently can’t understand the difference.
-
I will suspend disbelief for one moment and assume the SKL-HED exists at all (SKL Higher Energy Density).
So Rossi claims 4 kW power output (if you assume his 4kWh/h is just a stupid way of writing it).
Do you notice Rossi mentions the power to cool the "reactor" but not to run the external "control unit" which is so very, very complex. Are you sure this external power supply, er, control unit I mean, was running from electricity generated from the ecat? He is able to condition the ouput of the skl sufficiently to run this controller? For the qx test it was running off the mains, hence the moronic 1 ohm resistor/flip switching fiasco.
Perhaps his controller is like the one off the shelf version linked below, capable of 4 kW.
https://www.powerandtest.com/p…power-supplies/dlm-3-4-kw.
Sam, as our official conduit to Rossi, can you ask him if (he claims) this controller runs directly from power from the ecat, and not plugged into the mains? And even if it was running "closed loop" for some period, how much of that 4 kW was it using for that time? If it was around 4kW, that would make sense.
-
This whole Rossi approach has given me a great new idea. So Rossi has a controller/power supply that runs the ecat, which generates electricity to run the power supply.
Suppose you took a motor, geared it to another motor shaft that acted like a generator, geared such that the second motor created more power than the first consumed? You would have to first briefly plug the first motor into the mains to get it kick started of course. You would need to cool these and the excess electrical power could be harvested, with perhaps 2 solder connections as opposed to 10000. I wonder if anyone on the internet has ever tried this?
(Before someone humor challenged starts lambasting me, yes this is sarcasm)
-
Yes.
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
Sam, as our official conduit to Rossi, can you ask him if (he claims) this controller runs directly from power from the ecat, and not plugged into the mains? And even if it was running "closed loop" for some period, how much of that 4 kW was it using for that time? If it was around 4kW, that would make sense.
Yes I can ask.But would it not be better if you
ask him yourself.
One thing I know about you is that
you are not a shy guy.
Leave a reply is at the bottom of
this link.
-
Display More
Sam12 and Mark U,
Do you not realize that Rossi has said this very same thing for:
The original eCat (it was a magnificenze!)
The Hot Cat
The Gas Cat
The 1 MW plant Cat ( 80+ COP, ran for a year, used in actual production..... all a lie of course)
The Quark Cat (5 sigma certified!)
The QuarkX cat
The SK Cat
The SKL Cat
and I am not even sure what the current version is called.
You must at least acknowledge that Rossi has said the same for EVERY one of these.... Robotic factories ready... tests made with great results... ready for production.... and then all of a sudden on to the new model and all prior progress forgotten.
Rossi has since day one stated he has a "team" of engineers, programmers, technicians, but reality hit the fan when the court depositions proved he was out and out lying... about it all.... no robotic factories, no team (beyond Fabiani), no customers, no working product.
Every published name Rossi has worked with has gone silent and refuses to comment except IH.
Focardi died, the Swedish profs refuse to comment for years now, his first theory collaborator refused comment, Gullstrom refuses comment, no customers has came forward, no partners have came forward, no evidence of anything.... except IH, which showed in court, under oath depositions, that everything Rossi was saying was a lie.
And now you still believe? You actually think Rossi will give data, show a viable demo, show anything real at all? I have asked several times .... why? What evidence do you have that we do not? What make you believe Rossi at all? Surely you can point to some hard facts! If not, then you should wake up to the realization it is a pipe dream led on by a convicted felon and scammer.
There are NO people you can say "I believe because they have seen it." (Remember, Focardi did not see anything other than an original prototype) and none others are making any support for Rossi. If so, please identify them!
Sincerely, aside from wishful thinking, what argument can you make against the repeated lies and misleadings of this convicted conman? (Yes, indeed he was actually convicted and spent jail time)
You are helping continue to give LENR a black eye by supporting him!
Bob#2,
See Weak Minded post above
-
A couple interesting comment one
of them from BG.
Well, I will wait for the September surprise to call my skeptical friends, I have been burned before.. 2
Reply-
- −
Bob Greenyer Alain Samoun4 hours ago
I'll wait until I see it tested on a battery of known capacity with a realistic load which is self evident (not increasing temperature of water when you have to rely on the set up for the 'facts', but something like raising a water volume to a known height by a specified pump) for a sufficient time with a credible independent party sharing transparent data. After which, I will study the data.
-
-
Rossi is not harvesting heat to generate electricity. Rather it seems he is directly harvesting the voltage differences between plasma layers, although he has not said that outright.
Mark,
Do you have any idea of how many crackpot, cockamamie and outright insane theories about the latest “Rossi-ma-Bob” have been floated in the ether since 2011?
I mean really?
“Harvesting voltage differences between plasma layers”?
Really?
-
“Harvesting voltage differences between plasma layers”?
Your ignorance is showing badly. This is basic plasma physics.
" A double layer is a structure in a plasma and consists of two parallel layers with opposite electrical charge. The sheets of charge cause a strong electric field and a correspondingly sharp change in voltage (electrical potential) across the double layer. Ions and electrons which enter the double layer are accelerated, decelerated, or reflected by the electric field. In general, double layers (which may be curved rather than flat) separate regions of plasma with quite different characteristics. Double layers are found in a wide variety of plasmas, from discharge tubes to space plasmas to the Birkeland currents supplying the Earth’s aurora, and are especially common in current-carrying plasmas. Compared to the sizes of the plasmas which contain them, double layers are very thin (typically ten Debye lengths), with widths ranging from a few millimeters for laboratory plasmas to thousands of kilometres for astrophysical plasmas.
Other names for a double layer are: electrostatic double layer, electric double layer, plasma double layers, electrostatic shock (a type of double layer which is oriented at an oblique angle to the magnetic field in such a way that the perpendicular electric field is much larger than the parallel electric field),[6] space charge layer,[7] and “potential ramp”.[8] In laser physics, a double layer is sometimes called an ambipolar electric field.[9] Double layers are conceptually related to the concept of a ‘sheath’ (see Debye sheath)."
-
A couple interesting comment one
of them from BG.
Now it is interesting? The guys here are asking for such a test since years, made lots of commemts on the Rossi blog describing how such a test should look like. But we never saw and will see such a test. Because it is not possible for him.
-
about the latest “Rossi-ma-Bob”
"“Rossi-ma-Bob”" Hey! I take exception to this phrase!
-
Your ignorance is showing badly. This is basic plasma physics.
Another subtle
for Rossi!How about your thoughts on Rossi's other actually ridiculous claims made on this subject over many years? You really believe he made 10,000 hand solder joints? Any quotes about ignorance of Rossi on this blatant crock of crap? Basic sense indicates one would not be making 10,000 hand solder joints.
Interesting indeed.... the often subtle defense of Rossi by criticizing those who point our Rossi "stupidities" and yet nary ever a word of challenge or criticism of Rossi's ridiculous statements or claims!
