Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

Quote from clarifier

Did You read ? Recently Rossi wrote, that he has a HIGH TECH COMPANY.

- That's why he told us, that its e-cat can produce heat, electricity and thrust, abvout 2 years go ???

- That's why they never again told us, if they reached the Carnot cycle ???

- That's why we never ever again heard of the gasturbine attempt ???

- That's why their device look like a crappy piece of garage garbage screwed together by a child ???

- That's why no one could even see his upper body and head during the "SK demo" ???

This is "HIGH TECH" ???

Ou, I am not quite sure, but I start to believe, that Rossi suddenly but surely is loosing his mind....

Display More

remember he claimed his customer was one of the top 10 larges global companies.

Quote from Shane D.

Could be Rossi had, or has a little something, but if so, he will take it to his grave.

I don't think he would (take it to his grave). He has asserted several times that the tech is in good hands in the event of his demise. Sure, you can disbelieve that and whatever else, but I think if he has what he says he has, he would want to go down in history as being the discoverer. It might actually be in better hands anyway if anything were to happen to him.

If anything were to happen to Rossi, it would naturally be a conspiracy between big oil and the US scientific establishment that caused it. The investigation will be buried by the US government, just like the truth about the flat earth and water memory. The "better hands" would be imprisoned and tortured at Guantanamo Bay to be sure to protect these secret societies. Just ask most of the ECW posters.

Quote from IH Fanboy

I don't think he would (take it to his grave). He has asserted several times that the tech is in good hands in the event of his demise. Sure, you can disbelieve that and whatever else, but I think if he has what he says he has, he would want to go down in history as being the discoverer. It might actually be in better hands anyway if anything were to happen to him.

That thought is contrary to the evidence. Actions speak much louder than words, and IF as you speculate Rossi had what he says he has, he has time and again done all he can to avoid going down in history as its discoverer.

Quote from THHuxleynew

Actions speak much louder than words, and IF as you speculate Rossi had what he says he has, he has time and again done all he can to avoid going down in history as its discoverer.

Yes. He has avoided this, even though he could easily accomplish it. He has often passed up opportunities to prove his claims, with NASA and others. He could have done that in one day. I do not mean the NASA people would have been completely persuaded that day, but they told me they were prepared to look carefully as his demonstration and then take a machine back and evaluate it. He could have done his part in one day, and the rest would be up to them.

It isn't as if he would have to do months of work to go down in history as the discoverer. He claimed it took a year to demonstrate the gadget in Doral, Florida, but that made no sense.

Quote from Alan Smith

You forgot to mention the 5G 'kill-grid' the Illuminati are financing.

I have never heard of this, but I understand it will lead to mandatory vaccinations:

https://ourgreaterdestiny.word…to-mandatory-vaccination/

One more thing to worry about! Where will it end??

Quote from Shane D.

You have more faith in the man than I do. Even you must agree it is not an unreasonable position to disbelieve whatever he says? That is not to say he does not have a little something. I keep reading testimonials supporting that. Not many, but some, and those are very passionate.

Nearly every one of Rossi's actions over the years can be explained and placed into a certain context that makes sense, including the deceptions. For whatever reason, I (and a few others) can clearly see it, what likely motivates his actions, and what has brought us to the present situation today. If it turns out that Rossi has that little something as you and I suspect, I (and a few others) have provided the reasons for his actions, nearly every one. There will be no excuse for anyone who has followed along on this forum to cry that none of it made sense along the way.

Quote from Shane D.

IHFB,

We shall see if Rossi rewards his supporters with something he has been lacking for years...loyalty. He owes a great deal to those like myself during his early years, and you in his latter, who have covered for his many questionable actions. Without, it is doubtful he would have enough public attention to keep up whatever it is he is up to.

Here, another ardent supporter (Lewan) comments on the recent Huw Price article. A quick reminder; we are trying to get Mats to participate here, so go easy on him:

"Thanks Huw for an excellent overview and an important discussion, honouring the 30th anniversary of Fleischmann and Pons' presentation in 1989.

As for ongoing efforts and the bets you got involved in, I agree with your view on Godes' Brillouin Energy, and also on your observation that Andrea Rossi has not yet provided convincing and undisputed evidence for the validity of his E-Cat technology.

However, I don't agree in your description of evidence for Rossi being dishonest, having followed the lawsuit between him and his former licensee IH, which in turn never provided any convincing evidence for the E-Cat plant of 1MW not being effective.

And I find it interesting to note his recent commercial offering of energy sale from his E-Cat SK to industrial customers in the US, Sweden, and Japan, allegedly not involving any economic risk for the customers who essentially only pay for the energy delivered at least at 20 percent below market price, thus making it essentially impossible for Rossi to use fake technology without losing economically.

As I note in my blogpost My take on the E-Cat SK presentation—Rossi now takes orders, we cannot know anything for sure until one or a few of his customers step out and talk publicly. Personally, however, from what I have observed and from what I have learned through testimonials from people working with Rossi, I find the fraud hypothesis very hard to make credible.

Time will tell."

Display More

I would advise Mats against it though, since you only want him here for fishing and "honey pot" purposes. His current approach of "not feeding the trolls" and instead sharing his opinion on his blog (which is read by everyone interested in the topic anyway) is way smarter.

Quote from Shane D.

IHFB,

We shall see if Rossi rewards his supporters with something he has been lacking for years...loyalty. He owes a great deal to those like myself during his early years, and you in his latter, who have covered for his many questionable actions. Without, it is doubtful he would have enough public attention to keep up whatever it is he is up to.

Here, another ardent supporter (Lewan) comments on the recent Huw Price article. A quick reminder; we are trying to get Mats to participate here, so go easy on him:

"Thanks Huw for an excellent overview and an important discussion, honouring the 30th anniversary of Fleischmann and Pons' presentation in 1989.

As for ongoing efforts and the bets you got involved in, I agree with your view on Godes' Brillouin Energy, and also on your observation that Andrea Rossi has not yet provided convincing and undisputed evidence for the validity of his E-Cat technology.

However, I don't agree in your description of evidence for Rossi being dishonest, having followed the lawsuit between him and his former licensee IH, which in turn never provided any convincing evidence for the E-Cat plant of 1MW not being effective.

And I find it interesting to note his recent commercial offering of energy sale from his E-Cat SK to industrial customers in the US, Sweden, and Japan, allegedly not involving any economic risk for the customers who essentially only pay for the energy delivered at least at 20 percent below market price, thus making it essentially impossible for Rossi to use fake technology without losing economically.

As I note in my blogpost My take on the E-Cat SK presentation—Rossi now takes orders, we cannot know anything for sure until one or a few of his customers step out and talk publicly. Personally, however, from what I have observed and from what I have learned through testimonials from people working with Rossi, I find the fraud hypothesis very hard to make credible.

Time will tell."

Display More

I have great respect for Mats. He comes from a conventional scientific reporting background, and has put himself out there like few others. Hopefully he will chime in here in the future, but he already has a voice that is heard far and wide.

Quote

However, I don't agree in your description of evidence for Rossi being dishonest, having followed the lawsuit between him and his former licensee IH, which in turn never provided any convincing evidence for the E-Cat plant of 1MW not being effective.

Seriously? How about thousands of pages of testimony and test results? How about a complete absence of any evidence in the test year that it actually worked? How about the fake client that turned out to be Rossi? How about... ?? where to stop?

Quote

we cannot know anything for sure until one or a few of his customers step out and talk publicly. Personally, however, from what I have observed and from what I have learned through testimonials from people working with Rossi, I find the fraud hypothesis very hard to make credible.

Nice idea except that Rossi has never had a customer who received a working product nor a distributor who received any product to sell. If you know otherwise, Mats or IHFB, please let us know who it is and what they said. Any hypothesis other than fraud at this point seems completely untenable to any real world dweller.

Quote

His [Mats'] current approach of "not feeding the trolls" and instead sharing his opinion on his blog (which is read by everyone interested in the topic anyway) is way smarter.

I don't know about "smarter." But his blog is completely censored and strongly dissenting opinions are deleted prior to "publication" so actually, that is a dishonest and highly biased approach.

Quote

I have great respect for Mats. He comes from a conventional scientific reporting background

In the distant past, Mats worked for NYTeknik, a legitimate technical journal. But far as I know, he has no longer contributed to them since he waxed fanciful in his approbation of Rossi.

Quote from Shane D.

[Quoting Lewan] However, I don't agree in your description of evidence for Rossi being dishonest, having followed the lawsuit between him and his former licensee IH, which in turn never provided any convincing evidence for the E-Cat plant of 1MW not being effective.

Wrong. They did provide convincing evidence. It convinced me, anyway. More to the point, Rossi himself provided convincing evidence that the E-Cat does not work, in the Penon report.

Quote from seven_of_twenty

Seriously? How about thousands of pages of testimony and test results? How about a complete absence of any evidence in the test year that it actually worked? How about the fake client that turned out to be Rossi? How about... ?? where to stop?

Were there thousands of pages? Not to nitpick, but I think we have the opposite of "a complete absence . . . that it worked." We have positive proof that it did not work, from Rossi himself (as I just wrote above).

The fake client is evidence that Rossi is dishonest, but that does not prove the machine did not work. People with real technology sometimes lie. That happens a lot in the computer business.

Quote from seven_of_twenty

I don't know about "smarter." But his blog is completely censored and strongly dissenting opinions are deleted prior to "publication" so actually, that is a dishonest and highly biased approach.

By putting it that way you sort of explain it well Unless having wet dreams or an obscure fetish about trolls like you I would consider keeping the blog that way a very sensible decision.

Quote from Shane D.

It is not all about us wanting to feed Lewan to our animals...although they have not been fed in a while. We do have our altruistic reasons for wanting him here too. We love insiders, and there is no better informed on Rossi than him. He knows more than all of us combined.

Nah. They're fed alright ... It's more like they are getting pretty old and toothless or maybe just fat and happy craving only fat n' sugar - but unable to digest the proteins and vitamins so much needed to think properly