Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

Quote from Paradigmnoia

I was looking for the stump of the tree reported to have been cut down.

Now I am fairly certain there is no such tree or stump.

You weren't there. The people who WERE there all agreed that there had been an offer. You're trying to knock down contemporary accounts after the fact, after there was an acknowledged attempt to alter the narrative, after there had been threats made to a bunch of people on the thread, after Eric said that some animals are more equal than others, after Ruby Tuesday was created on the Rossi blog to discuss what we were going over on the thread, after Jed said there was an offer, after Eric moved parts of the thread elsewhere, and after you had already gone into humptydumpty mode. I'm fairly certain your viewpoint has been distorted.

Quote from Paradigmnoia

I made the grievous error of saying that a fact should be something real, not some weird Humpty Dumpty world version where a fact is something agreed upon by different people. (The factuality of something apparently being decided by consensus rather than by the impartial reality of truth.)

In point of fact, you came up directly alongside Dewey who had been operating as a well marked adam henry who couldn't let go of whether or not the offer was "real" when I repeatedly showed that it was immaterial , that the offer could be used as a way to push Rossi around like a rag doll. So after having to repeatedly point it out to Dewey the AH, then I had to do exactly the same thing to you, while you were trying to revise history after Dewey did his seagull impersonation. So if you operate just like an adam henry, alongside an adam henry, use the same argumentation as an adam henry and repeatedly & blithely ignore the obvious like an adam henry, are we all supposed to just ignore it because you had been polite in the past? If it looks like a duck, flies alongside other ducks, quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and isn't a goose, why can't we treat it like it's a duck?

What?

I reported here (translated in English) a comment (it was not a my comment) from another Blog where someone wrote to be a witness that knows Penon and Fabiani.

Do you admit here claims just from jonp blog or “news” from anonymous Rossi’s believers?

This is shameless censure.

Quote

The person who wrote that (now deleted) post is a well-known troll btw.

Prove it!

Quote from Malcolm Lear

Where did Hunters post go???

It's on Cobraf forum, tread: Black out (Fusione Fredda, Andrea Rossi....).

I can’t write the link otherwise Alan Smith, the LENR Forum censor, will use this as an excuse to ban me.

IMO, due to increased power of this biased censor, this LF has really got worse, day by day.

Obviously witnesses against Rossi's clan are immediately sold as well-known trolls.

Quote from Dewey Weaver

Alan is a Rossi defender promoter who said he would stay in the shadows but cannot manage to do so - one day will find out why.

KevMo continues to insist that an anonymous SP was involved in a real offer discussion. There was nothing real about it.

It was a Planet Rossi positioning and PR play. He continues to live on "facts" from non-factual sources and criminal con.

I came up with a scheme that could have caused Rossi quite the legal headache, involving his offer on JONP that others had seen. But Dewey, who works for Industrial Heat and has it within his bailiwick to monitor internet postings to keep IH apprised, completely missed it. This is something that cost IH $15Million, so it's a complete wank on Dewey's part. Otherwise, why is an IH employee giving someone such a hard time that would have given IH a great deal of leverage? His actions only make sense in this light. He even threatened us on the thread with legal action. I find myself wondering if a simple phone call to Dewey's employer is going to get him fired..... hmmmm....

Quote from RobertBryant

Does IH have a legal opinion on this or is this just DW personal opinion?

Careful now. Even though what you wrote might help out IH, if it puts Dewey in a bad light he might threaten to sue you.

Quote from THHuxleynew

Before I leave this site, I'd like to make a full confession.

Ever since I first attended Rossi's early demo, I've been convinced his stuff works. Sure, Rossi is a strange character and says weird things. But I had hidden measuring instruments, including my state of the art portable neutrino detector which we (identity deleted) had been developing, and (unbeknownst to Rossi) can detect a neutrino flux 300,000X higher than ambient coming from his device. There is just no way that could happen without some type of nuclear reaction: even if normal high energy particles seem to be suppressed, and of course neutrinos are (normally) not easily detected.

Since then we have been working in secret to reverse-engineer and optimise the Rossi reaction. It is a race against time, because Rossi, while in many ways technically incompetent, had a head start on us.

A few days ago we hit pay dirt. The last barrier to large-scale commercialisation was broken and we now have a small device that will generate thermal power with no waste and no radioacitivty (except for a very large neutrino flux which however is completely harmless and without specialist equipment undetectable).

Those who've wondered about my posting here can now understand it: I desperately needed to ensure that Rossi's efforts were impeded, keeping him focussed on internet reputation and away from real development.

Now that does not matter.

THH (AKA IOMNESFTW)

Display More

Good for you and best wishes. May you some day be so famous as to have to deal with skeptopaths on the internet regarding your back story.