I wish we could get Levi et al. to respond to critiques such as yours, but I doubt they will.
There has been a response by Levi in the court documents :
On July 27, 2016, I met with Mr. Sha in Rome to have a follow-up discussion about our last meeting. Mr. Sha requested that I keep this meeting secret, but did not ask me to sign any nondisclosure agreement. During the course of this meeting, Mr. Sha told me that he wanted to make business together and that "big earnings" were possible. He then asked me a series of formal questions about the Lugano Report.
All of the critiques and questions that Mr. Sha raised had been previously raised in blog posts that aim to discredit Dr. Rossi and the Lugano Report;
none of Mr. Sha's questions had any scientific basis or varied from the unscientific
attacks made in the blog posts.
So basically levi states thatMr Sha raised the same questions (critique) which where also made on the blog posts.
This tells us that Levis is aware of the critique on the Lugano report.
Nevertheless he states that the critique has no scientific basis.