Rossi-Blog Comment Discussion

Quote from Shane D.

So how would Researchgate, and Rossi not saying anymore that his SK is certified, be connected?

There are investigations into both.

SGS is pissed off. Rossi will probably never get any certifications for anything out of them ever again.

Quote from bang99

Shure, you can buy "clicks" aka "page requested from client <IP>: counts as "page visited"

You can also buy/count "Document requested for download from client <IP>: counts as "doc downloaded"

That's all countabe!

But: "Full readings" is IMHO something you can't count.

You simply can not measure, if an entity realy reads a page or a downloaded document.

Display More

Aha, here is the JONP explanation (emphasis added):

• Fred June 2, 2019 at 2:14 PM

  Dr Rossi:

  Your paper on Researchgate is important: Researchgate is the sole scientific publication whose peer reviewing is made democratically, in open source and this is the reason why the New York Times considers it one of the most important scientific carriers. As a matter of fact, a publication on Reseachgate is peer reviewed from all the scientists, professors, researchers that read it and they express their opinion on the publication freely. Your publication is very difficult to understand and it is restricted to nuclear physicists, so a full reading is very heavy. The statistics are rigidly controlled from the moderators, so that the result of the peer reviewing is there, clear and undisputable. Hundreds of full readings for one nuclear physics publication in one year are considered a successful peer reviewing. You got 22 300 and counting in less than 5 months.

  Congratulations, this is not a success, this is a revolution in the making.

  All the best,

  Fred

But, wait:

As a matter of fact, a publication on Reseachgate is peer reviewed from all the scientists, professors, researchers that read it and they express their opinion on the publication freely.

For the normal stuff, but not he Rossi stuff:

[...] Your publication is very difficult to understand and it is restricted to nuclear physicists, so a full reading is very heavy.

Someone like Josef M. Gaßner (German astronomer, mathematician, physicist) is RESTRICTED, because he is no nuclear physicists?!

He is part of the "Urknall, Weltall und das Leben" team, running a YouTube channel( >100.000 abo's), capable of explaining all mainstream theories from "Aristoteles to Stringtheorie" in now 45 episodes...

... is RESTRICTED?!

I don't get that ...

JoNP sockpuppets to the RESCUE!

"They" are surely reading here on LF, the above post on JoNP is a is clear reaction to my and other posta

Oh, I forgot, ONLY nuclear physicists on Planet Rossi are ALLOWED in that E-Cat stuff.

Like the ERV (a Rossi invention for "Expert Responsible for Validation").

Penon! How is the weather there in the Dominican Republic?

Quote from Shane D.

I am starting to think Rossi does this because he knows it gets on our nerves. Like running fingernails across chalkboard. Maybe Sam can ask him to stop?:

1. Palomino June 2, 2019 at 7:51 AM

   Dear Andrea,

   I am a Researchgateholic, because it is a gold mine for the research in general. Your incredible numbers, after 4 months and 10 days are as of right now these:

   Full readings 22375, Research interest index 342.5, Recommendations 935 and they come from all the world, mainly universities.

   And counting.

   These are not numbers that an average professor achieves in a career lifespan, these are numbers that few professors achieve in all the world.

   This speaks loud about your recognition. Your paper http://www.researchgate.net/pu…nge_particle_interactions is one of the most interesting papers of nuclear physics published in the world in the last year. This is the fact.

   Godspeed,

   Palomino

2. Andrea Rossi June 2, 2019 at 9:32 AM

   Palomino:

   …and you have no idea of the emails I am receiving from researchers and teachers from universities and independent laboratories og all the Continents. I am really stunned. When I sent the publication I was hoping to have at least 200 readings, to be in the average…

   Thank you for your attention to our work,

   Warm Regards,

   A.R.

Display More

If the readings are legitimate then Rossi should be proud of them.

Quote from THHuxleynew

I always liken Rossi to Elastigirl - except what he stretches is the truth and often to breaking point.

sam12 You have been here a while now and can compare Rossi's PR 12 months ago with what he is saying now, and the 100% guaranteed lack of any hard evidence.

Are you feeling more or less confident that he is for real?

THH

Display More

My confidence level is 7 out of 10

that Rossi will be succesful.

It helps to keep it there knowing

people like Iggy Dairymple still believe in Rossi.

Quote from sam12

My confidence level is 7 out of 10

that Rossi will be succesful.

It helps to keep it there knowing

people like Iggy Dairymple still believe in Rossi.

Thanks Sam,

It will be interesting to track how this changes over the next 6 months with continued no evidence of Rossi's stuff working.

JSTYK - I believe in Rossi too - just in a different version.

Quote from sam12

If the readings are legitimate then Rossi should be proud of them.

Only proud of having effective outreach PR. Which I think even Rossi's critics would allow he has always had.

A researchgate article claiming a new method to halt aging would also get a large download rate from fringe internet publicity - regardless of its having any merits.

Rossi confuses selected internet crowd acclamation - always a priority of his - with merit.

Quote from Forty-Two

Time to ask @Adrian if it is yet a generally accepted fact that Rossi has started the production of commercial E-cats. - Or is Rossi just another ”babbler”?

RossiSays (tm) that he has installed a commercial unit and that the customer is happy. I believe, in AA's view, that would constitute generally accepted satisfaction of his conditions to winning the bet. Strange however that AA never actually responded to any of the bets offered to him. Hummmm.

Apropos readings and downloads -- thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of people believe that the earth is flat and/or that the sun revolves around the earth. They download and read lots of articles supporting those beliefs, but that doesn't make those beliefs any more accurate.

Quote from hunter

Really funny, now the “prof-to-prof” comment, dated June 13, 2019 at 2:30 PM, disappeared from jonp.

Rossi failed also managing sock puppets he created.

His ”genius” is no more sufficient to cover all the lies published on jonp and this scam.

He’s being ridiculous and age effects are evident.

Hunter: to be fair to Rossi (you know I am always fair to him) that comment could have been a non-Rossi spoof comment posted for laughs. Some here have done such things. Or, it could be as you say.

THH

Quote from hunter

Really funny, now the “prof-to-prof” comment, dated June 13, 2019 at 2:30 PM, disappeared from jonp.

Rossi failed also managing sock puppets he created.

His ”genius” is no more sufficient to cover all the lies published on jonp and this scam. He’s being ridiculous and age effects are evident.

I also noticed this glitch - but I expected Rossi just to “correct” the sockpuppet-names.

That’s why I took a screenshot:

Quote from clarifier

This screenshot-idea is good, maybe also combined with a source-download. So we can ( and I would ) precisely introspect this scammer. If I had the time :-D.

The files are quite large. Microsoft Word just about s**ts itself each time due to spell check.

Quote from Forty-Two

I also noticed this glich [...]

He's getting older and is a busy condo admin, tennis loser, fake news producer and whatever he also is doing, hidden for us.

Quote from Paradigmnoia

The files are quite large. Microsoft Word just about s**ts itself each time due to spell check.

I heard Rossi is working on a cloud based solution for the grammer check portion of his blog due to the high cpu load. The AI inference engine is already stressed.